估计人类和非人类灵长类动物数据中任务相关信息的内在多维度。

Zachary Bretton-Granatoor, Hannah Stealey, Samantha R Santacruz, Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
{"title":"估计人类和非人类灵长类动物数据中任务相关信息的内在多维度。","authors":"Zachary Bretton-Granatoor,&nbsp;Hannah Stealey,&nbsp;Samantha R Santacruz,&nbsp;Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock","doi":"10.1109/BioCAS54905.2022.9948604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Feature selection, or dimensionality reduction, has become a standard step in reducing large-scale neural datasets into usable signals for brain-machine interface and neurofeedback decoders. Current techniques in fMRI data reduce the number of voxels (features) by performing statistics on individual voxels or using traditional techniques that utilize linear combinations of features (e.g., principal component analysis (PCA)). However, these methods often do not account for the cross-correlations found across voxels and do not sufficiently reduce the feature space to support efficient real-time feedback. To overcome these limitations, we propose using factor analysis on fMRI data. This technique has become increasingly popular for extracting a minimal number of latent features to explain high-dimensional data in non-human primates (NHPs). Here, we demonstrate these methods in both NHP and human data. In NHP subjects (n=2), we reduced the number of features to an average of 26.86% and 14.86% of the total feature space to build our multinomial classifier. In one NHP subject, the average accuracy of classifying eight target locations over 64 sessions was 62.43% (+/-6.19%) compared to a PCA-based classifier with 60.26% (+/-6.02%). In healthy fMRI subjects, we reduced the feature space to an average of 0.33% of the initial space. Group average (n=5) accuracy of FA-based category classification was 74.33% (+/- 4.91%) compared to a PCA-based classifier with 68.42% (+/-4.79%). FA-based classifiers can maintain the performance fidelity observed with PCA-based decoders. Importantly, FA-based methods allow researchers to address specific hypotheses about how underlying neural activity relates to behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":73279,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference : healthcare technology : [proceedings]. IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference","volume":"2022 ","pages":"650-654"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942267/pdf/nihms-1873284.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating Intrinsic Manifold Dimensionality to Classify Task-Related Information in Human and Non-Human Primate Data.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Bretton-Granatoor,&nbsp;Hannah Stealey,&nbsp;Samantha R Santacruz,&nbsp;Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BioCAS54905.2022.9948604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Feature selection, or dimensionality reduction, has become a standard step in reducing large-scale neural datasets into usable signals for brain-machine interface and neurofeedback decoders. Current techniques in fMRI data reduce the number of voxels (features) by performing statistics on individual voxels or using traditional techniques that utilize linear combinations of features (e.g., principal component analysis (PCA)). However, these methods often do not account for the cross-correlations found across voxels and do not sufficiently reduce the feature space to support efficient real-time feedback. To overcome these limitations, we propose using factor analysis on fMRI data. This technique has become increasingly popular for extracting a minimal number of latent features to explain high-dimensional data in non-human primates (NHPs). Here, we demonstrate these methods in both NHP and human data. In NHP subjects (n=2), we reduced the number of features to an average of 26.86% and 14.86% of the total feature space to build our multinomial classifier. In one NHP subject, the average accuracy of classifying eight target locations over 64 sessions was 62.43% (+/-6.19%) compared to a PCA-based classifier with 60.26% (+/-6.02%). In healthy fMRI subjects, we reduced the feature space to an average of 0.33% of the initial space. Group average (n=5) accuracy of FA-based category classification was 74.33% (+/- 4.91%) compared to a PCA-based classifier with 68.42% (+/-4.79%). FA-based classifiers can maintain the performance fidelity observed with PCA-based decoders. Importantly, FA-based methods allow researchers to address specific hypotheses about how underlying neural activity relates to behavior.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference : healthcare technology : [proceedings]. IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference\",\"volume\":\"2022 \",\"pages\":\"650-654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942267/pdf/nihms-1873284.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference : healthcare technology : [proceedings]. IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BioCAS54905.2022.9948604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference : healthcare technology : [proceedings]. IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BioCAS54905.2022.9948604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特征选择,或降维,已经成为将大规模神经数据集简化为脑机接口和神经反馈解码器可用信号的标准步骤。fMRI数据的当前技术通过对单个体素进行统计或使用利用特征线性组合的传统技术(例如,主成分分析(PCA))来减少体素(特征)的数量。然而,这些方法通常没有考虑到体素之间的相互关联,也没有充分减少特征空间来支持有效的实时反馈。为了克服这些限制,我们建议对fMRI数据进行因子分析。这种技术在提取最小数量的潜在特征来解释非人灵长类动物(NHPs)的高维数据方面越来越受欢迎。在这里,我们在NHP和人类数据中展示了这些方法。在NHP受试者(n=2)中,我们将特征数量平均减少到总特征空间的26.86%和14.86%,以构建我们的多项分类器。在一名NHP受试者中,在64个会话中对8个目标位置进行分类的平均准确率为62.43%(+/-6.19%),而基于pca的分类器的准确率为60.26%(+/-6.02%)。在健康的fMRI受试者中,我们将特征空间缩小到初始空间的平均0.33%。基于fa的分类器组平均准确率(n=5)为74.33%(+/- 4.91%),而基于pca的分类器组平均准确率为68.42%(+/-4.79%)。基于fa的分类器可以保持基于pca的解码器观察到的性能保真度。重要的是,基于fa的方法允许研究人员解决关于潜在神经活动如何与行为相关的特定假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating Intrinsic Manifold Dimensionality to Classify Task-Related Information in Human and Non-Human Primate Data.

Feature selection, or dimensionality reduction, has become a standard step in reducing large-scale neural datasets into usable signals for brain-machine interface and neurofeedback decoders. Current techniques in fMRI data reduce the number of voxels (features) by performing statistics on individual voxels or using traditional techniques that utilize linear combinations of features (e.g., principal component analysis (PCA)). However, these methods often do not account for the cross-correlations found across voxels and do not sufficiently reduce the feature space to support efficient real-time feedback. To overcome these limitations, we propose using factor analysis on fMRI data. This technique has become increasingly popular for extracting a minimal number of latent features to explain high-dimensional data in non-human primates (NHPs). Here, we demonstrate these methods in both NHP and human data. In NHP subjects (n=2), we reduced the number of features to an average of 26.86% and 14.86% of the total feature space to build our multinomial classifier. In one NHP subject, the average accuracy of classifying eight target locations over 64 sessions was 62.43% (+/-6.19%) compared to a PCA-based classifier with 60.26% (+/-6.02%). In healthy fMRI subjects, we reduced the feature space to an average of 0.33% of the initial space. Group average (n=5) accuracy of FA-based category classification was 74.33% (+/- 4.91%) compared to a PCA-based classifier with 68.42% (+/-4.79%). FA-based classifiers can maintain the performance fidelity observed with PCA-based decoders. Importantly, FA-based methods allow researchers to address specific hypotheses about how underlying neural activity relates to behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microscale 3-D Capacitance Tomography with a CMOS Sensor Array. FlowMorph: Morphological Segmentation of Ultrasound-Monitored Spinal Cord Microcirculation. Programmable Electrochemical Stimulation on a Large-Scale CMOS Microelectrode Array. Design and Simulation of a Low Power 384-channel Actively Multiplexed Neural Interface. Estimating Intrinsic Manifold Dimensionality to Classify Task-Related Information in Human and Non-Human Primate Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1