Claire Sabin, Anne E Bowen, Erin Heberlein, Emily Pyle, Lauren Lund, Christina R Studts, Lauren B Shomaker, Stacey L Simon, Jill L Kaar
{"title":"普遍心理健康干预对负性情绪升高青少年的影响:为健康儿童建立弹性。","authors":"Claire Sabin, Anne E Bowen, Erin Heberlein, Emily Pyle, Lauren Lund, Christina R Studts, Lauren B Shomaker, Stacey L Simon, Jill L Kaar","doi":"10.1007/s40688-021-00388-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In response to the rise in mental health needs among youth, a school-based resilience intervention was implemented for sixth graders at an urban middle school. The goal of this analysis is to examine improvements in key mental health parameters among students who endorsed negative affectivity at baseline.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 285 11-12-year-olds (72% white, 18% Hispanic, 55% female) participated in a single-arm, non-randomized 6-week 1:1 school-based coaching intervention, Healthy Kids. Youth completed validated surveys at baseline and 6-week follow-up assessing depression/anxiety symptoms, bullying, self-efficacy, academic pressure, grit, and resilience. Participants were determined to have elevated negative affectivity if they reported mild-to-severe symptoms for both depression and anxiety symptoms. General linear models examined differences between groups for each mental health parameter, as well as change in outcomes from baseline to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A third of participants (38%) at baseline endorsed negative affectivity. Youth who endorsed negative affectivity were more often female (71% vs 29%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and identified as victims of cyberbullying (25% vs 8%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Youth with baseline negative affectivity scored lower for self-efficacy (total 70.5 vs 86.8; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Baseline negative affectivity was a significant moderator for change in mental health parameters. Post-intervention, those who endorsed baseline negative affectivity, medium effect sizes were observed for self-efficacy (<i>g</i> = 0.6; 95%CI 0.3, 0.9; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and anxiety symptoms (<i>g</i> = - 0.70; 95%CI - 1.0, - 0.4; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among all youth, there were significant medium intervention effects in resilience (<i>g</i> = 0.5; 95%CI 0.3, 0.7; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and self-efficacy (<i>g</i> = 0.7; 95%CI 0.4, 0.9; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A universal resiliency program may improve self-efficacy and symptoms of anxiety among youth experiencing negative affectivity, while improving resilience and self-efficacy among all youth. Our findings suggest a universal school-based coaching program benefits all youth, while also specifically targeting the needs of youth with negative affectivity who are most at risk for mental health concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":72700,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary school psychology","volume":"27 1","pages":"53-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40688-021-00388-z","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of a Universal Mental Health Intervention on Youth with Elevated Negative Affectivity: Building Resilience for Healthy Kids.\",\"authors\":\"Claire Sabin, Anne E Bowen, Erin Heberlein, Emily Pyle, Lauren Lund, Christina R Studts, Lauren B Shomaker, Stacey L Simon, Jill L Kaar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40688-021-00388-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In response to the rise in mental health needs among youth, a school-based resilience intervention was implemented for sixth graders at an urban middle school. The goal of this analysis is to examine improvements in key mental health parameters among students who endorsed negative affectivity at baseline.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 285 11-12-year-olds (72% white, 18% Hispanic, 55% female) participated in a single-arm, non-randomized 6-week 1:1 school-based coaching intervention, Healthy Kids. Youth completed validated surveys at baseline and 6-week follow-up assessing depression/anxiety symptoms, bullying, self-efficacy, academic pressure, grit, and resilience. Participants were determined to have elevated negative affectivity if they reported mild-to-severe symptoms for both depression and anxiety symptoms. General linear models examined differences between groups for each mental health parameter, as well as change in outcomes from baseline to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A third of participants (38%) at baseline endorsed negative affectivity. Youth who endorsed negative affectivity were more often female (71% vs 29%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and identified as victims of cyberbullying (25% vs 8%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Youth with baseline negative affectivity scored lower for self-efficacy (total 70.5 vs 86.8; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Baseline negative affectivity was a significant moderator for change in mental health parameters. Post-intervention, those who endorsed baseline negative affectivity, medium effect sizes were observed for self-efficacy (<i>g</i> = 0.6; 95%CI 0.3, 0.9; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and anxiety symptoms (<i>g</i> = - 0.70; 95%CI - 1.0, - 0.4; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among all youth, there were significant medium intervention effects in resilience (<i>g</i> = 0.5; 95%CI 0.3, 0.7; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and self-efficacy (<i>g</i> = 0.7; 95%CI 0.4, 0.9; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A universal resiliency program may improve self-efficacy and symptoms of anxiety among youth experiencing negative affectivity, while improving resilience and self-efficacy among all youth. Our findings suggest a universal school-based coaching program benefits all youth, while also specifically targeting the needs of youth with negative affectivity who are most at risk for mental health concerns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary school psychology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"53-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40688-021-00388-z\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary school psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-021-00388-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary school psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-021-00388-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
目的:为应对青少年心理健康需求的上升,对某城市中学六年级学生实施校本弹性干预。本分析的目的是检查在基线时认可消极情绪的学生中关键心理健康参数的改善情况。方法:285名11-12岁儿童(白人72%,西班牙裔18%,女性55%)参加了为期6周、非随机、1:1的学校辅导干预。青少年在基线和6周的随访中完成了有效的调查,评估抑郁/焦虑症状、欺凌、自我效能、学业压力、毅力和恢复力。如果参与者报告有轻微到严重的抑郁和焦虑症状,他们的负面情绪就会升高。一般线性模型检查各组之间每个心理健康参数的差异,以及从基线到随访结果的变化。结果:三分之一的参与者(38%)在基线时赞同消极情绪。认同消极情感的年轻人更多是女性(71%对29%;p p p g = 0.6;95%ci 0.3, 0.9;p g = - 0.70;95%ci - 1.0, - 0.4;p g = 0.5;95%ci 0.3, 0.7;p g = 0.7;95%ci 0.4, 0.9;p结论:通用弹性计划可以改善负性情感青年的自我效能感和焦虑症状,同时提高所有青年的弹性和自我效能感。我们的研究结果表明,一个普遍的以学校为基础的辅导计划有利于所有青少年,同时也特别针对那些最容易出现心理健康问题的消极情绪青少年的需求。
The Impact of a Universal Mental Health Intervention on Youth with Elevated Negative Affectivity: Building Resilience for Healthy Kids.
Objective: In response to the rise in mental health needs among youth, a school-based resilience intervention was implemented for sixth graders at an urban middle school. The goal of this analysis is to examine improvements in key mental health parameters among students who endorsed negative affectivity at baseline.
Method: A total of 285 11-12-year-olds (72% white, 18% Hispanic, 55% female) participated in a single-arm, non-randomized 6-week 1:1 school-based coaching intervention, Healthy Kids. Youth completed validated surveys at baseline and 6-week follow-up assessing depression/anxiety symptoms, bullying, self-efficacy, academic pressure, grit, and resilience. Participants were determined to have elevated negative affectivity if they reported mild-to-severe symptoms for both depression and anxiety symptoms. General linear models examined differences between groups for each mental health parameter, as well as change in outcomes from baseline to follow-up.
Results: A third of participants (38%) at baseline endorsed negative affectivity. Youth who endorsed negative affectivity were more often female (71% vs 29%; p < 0.001) and identified as victims of cyberbullying (25% vs 8%; p < 0.001). Youth with baseline negative affectivity scored lower for self-efficacy (total 70.5 vs 86.8; p < 0.0001). Baseline negative affectivity was a significant moderator for change in mental health parameters. Post-intervention, those who endorsed baseline negative affectivity, medium effect sizes were observed for self-efficacy (g = 0.6; 95%CI 0.3, 0.9; p < 0.001) and anxiety symptoms (g = - 0.70; 95%CI - 1.0, - 0.4; p < 0.001). Among all youth, there were significant medium intervention effects in resilience (g = 0.5; 95%CI 0.3, 0.7; p < 0.001) and self-efficacy (g = 0.7; 95%CI 0.4, 0.9; p < 0.001).
Conclusions: A universal resiliency program may improve self-efficacy and symptoms of anxiety among youth experiencing negative affectivity, while improving resilience and self-efficacy among all youth. Our findings suggest a universal school-based coaching program benefits all youth, while also specifically targeting the needs of youth with negative affectivity who are most at risk for mental health concerns.