在职业发展背景下考察职前教育者的隐性偏见。

Amanda C Breese, Amanda B Nickerson, Melinda Lemke, Rebecca Mohr, Kamontá Heidelburg, Stephanie Fredrick, Kathleen Allen
{"title":"在职业发展背景下考察职前教育者的隐性偏见。","authors":"Amanda C Breese, Amanda B Nickerson, Melinda Lemke, Rebecca Mohr, Kamontá Heidelburg, Stephanie Fredrick, Kathleen Allen","doi":"10.1007/s40688-023-00456-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The opportunity gap, or conditions and barriers that impede the academic performance and school experience of minoritized students, may be exacerbated by educators' implicit biases. The aim of this qualitative study was to understand preservice educators' awareness of individual, structural, and systemic racism with regard to implicit bias. Our sample included 154 preservice educators, enrolled in an anti-bullying/harassment/discrimination training, which is required for any New York State (NYS) educator certification. Educators responded to questions about group generalizations, factors contributing to these biases, and how biases may affect their behavior toward students. Our content analysis revealed several themes, most notably that frequent biases existed toward Asian/Asian Americans, Black/African Americans, males, and people from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds. Although participant responses reflect an open-minded approach to discussing bias, many responses reflected no observable desire to change potentially biased interactions with students. Responses with racially held biases aligned with the tenets of critical race theory (CRT), particularly racism as permanent and racism as normalized. Implications for practice, with an emphasis on anti-bias training and professional development, are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72700,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary school psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Implicit Biases of Pre-Service Educators Within a Professional Development Context.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda C Breese, Amanda B Nickerson, Melinda Lemke, Rebecca Mohr, Kamontá Heidelburg, Stephanie Fredrick, Kathleen Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40688-023-00456-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The opportunity gap, or conditions and barriers that impede the academic performance and school experience of minoritized students, may be exacerbated by educators' implicit biases. The aim of this qualitative study was to understand preservice educators' awareness of individual, structural, and systemic racism with regard to implicit bias. Our sample included 154 preservice educators, enrolled in an anti-bullying/harassment/discrimination training, which is required for any New York State (NYS) educator certification. Educators responded to questions about group generalizations, factors contributing to these biases, and how biases may affect their behavior toward students. Our content analysis revealed several themes, most notably that frequent biases existed toward Asian/Asian Americans, Black/African Americans, males, and people from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds. Although participant responses reflect an open-minded approach to discussing bias, many responses reflected no observable desire to change potentially biased interactions with students. Responses with racially held biases aligned with the tenets of critical race theory (CRT), particularly racism as permanent and racism as normalized. Implications for practice, with an emphasis on anti-bias training and professional development, are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary school psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948799/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary school psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-023-00456-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary school psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-023-00456-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机会差距,或阻碍少数族裔学生学业成绩和在校经历的条件和障碍,可能因教育工作者的隐性偏见而加剧。这项定性研究旨在了解职前教育者对个人、结构性和系统性种族主义中的内隐偏见的认识。我们的样本包括 154 名参加反欺凌/骚扰/歧视培训的职前教育工作者,这是纽约州(NYS)教育工作者资格认证的必备条件。教育工作者回答了有关群体概括、造成这些偏见的因素以及偏见如何影响他们对学生的行为等问题。我们的内容分析揭示了几个主题,其中最明显的是对亚裔/美籍亚裔人士、黑人/美籍非裔人士、男性以及来自社会经济弱势背景的人经常存在偏见。尽管参与者的回答反映出他们在讨论偏见时持开放态度,但许多回答反映出他们并没有明显的意愿去改变与学生之间可能存在偏见的互动。带有种族偏见的回答符合批判性种族理论(CRT)的原则,特别是种族主义是永久性的和种族主义是正常化的。本文讨论了对实践的影响,重点是反偏见培训和专业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining Implicit Biases of Pre-Service Educators Within a Professional Development Context.

The opportunity gap, or conditions and barriers that impede the academic performance and school experience of minoritized students, may be exacerbated by educators' implicit biases. The aim of this qualitative study was to understand preservice educators' awareness of individual, structural, and systemic racism with regard to implicit bias. Our sample included 154 preservice educators, enrolled in an anti-bullying/harassment/discrimination training, which is required for any New York State (NYS) educator certification. Educators responded to questions about group generalizations, factors contributing to these biases, and how biases may affect their behavior toward students. Our content analysis revealed several themes, most notably that frequent biases existed toward Asian/Asian Americans, Black/African Americans, males, and people from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds. Although participant responses reflect an open-minded approach to discussing bias, many responses reflected no observable desire to change potentially biased interactions with students. Responses with racially held biases aligned with the tenets of critical race theory (CRT), particularly racism as permanent and racism as normalized. Implications for practice, with an emphasis on anti-bias training and professional development, are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Concurrent Validity of the GORT-5 with the WJ-IV Mental Health Screening: Recommendations from an Integrated Literature Review Lessons Learned from LGBTQ + Youths’ Experience in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Phenomenological Investigation Spirituality and Social-Emotional Learning: A Qualitative Examination of Teachers’ Perspectives Measuring School Climate as a Component of School Capacity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1