{"title":"面对新世纪挑战的中国知识分子","authors":"Baogang He","doi":"10.4324/9780203422113-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Democratization, marketization, professionalism and globalization challenge the traditional pattern of the Chinese intellectual and raise the following challenging questions. Are the Chinese ideas of the intellectual incompatible with the idea of democracy? How can the Chinese traditional idea of the intellectual, especially the Confucian critical tradition, survive in an increasingly commercial and professional society? And what defines the Chinese intellectual in an increasingly globalized world?","PeriodicalId":189833,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Politics of Autocratic Regimes (Topic)","volume":"216 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chinese Intellectuals Facing the Challenges of the New Century\",\"authors\":\"Baogang He\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780203422113-21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Democratization, marketization, professionalism and globalization challenge the traditional pattern of the Chinese intellectual and raise the following challenging questions. Are the Chinese ideas of the intellectual incompatible with the idea of democracy? How can the Chinese traditional idea of the intellectual, especially the Confucian critical tradition, survive in an increasingly commercial and professional society? And what defines the Chinese intellectual in an increasingly globalized world?\",\"PeriodicalId\":189833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Politics of Autocratic Regimes (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"216 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Politics of Autocratic Regimes (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422113-21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Politics of Autocratic Regimes (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422113-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Chinese Intellectuals Facing the Challenges of the New Century
Democratization, marketization, professionalism and globalization challenge the traditional pattern of the Chinese intellectual and raise the following challenging questions. Are the Chinese ideas of the intellectual incompatible with the idea of democracy? How can the Chinese traditional idea of the intellectual, especially the Confucian critical tradition, survive in an increasingly commercial and professional society? And what defines the Chinese intellectual in an increasingly globalized world?