JEM和AV1与HEVC的比较:编码工具、编码效率和复杂度

Thorsten Laude, Y. G. Adhisantoso, Jan Voges, Marco Munderloh, J. Ostermann
{"title":"JEM和AV1与HEVC的比较:编码工具、编码效率和复杂度","authors":"Thorsten Laude, Y. G. Adhisantoso, Jan Voges, Marco Munderloh, J. Ostermann","doi":"10.1109/PCS.2018.8456291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current state-of-the-art for standardized video codecs is High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) which was developed jointly by ISO/IEC and ITU-T. Recently, the development of two contenders for the next generation of standardized video codecs began: ISO/IEC and ITU-T advance the development of the Joint Exploration Model (JEM), a possible successor of HEVC, while the Alliance for Open Media pushes forward the video codec AV1. It is asserted by both groups that their codecs achieve superior coding efficiency over the state-of-the-art. In this paper, we discuss the distinguishing features of JEM and AV1 and evaluate their coding efficiency and computational complexity under well-defined and balanced test conditions. Our main findings are that JEM considerably outperforms HM and AV1 in terms of coding efficiency while AV1 cannot transform increased complexity into competitiveness in terms of coding efficiency with neither of the competitors except for the all-intra configuration.","PeriodicalId":433667,"journal":{"name":"2018 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of JEM and AV1 with HEVC: Coding Tools, Coding Efficiency and Complexity\",\"authors\":\"Thorsten Laude, Y. G. Adhisantoso, Jan Voges, Marco Munderloh, J. Ostermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PCS.2018.8456291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current state-of-the-art for standardized video codecs is High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) which was developed jointly by ISO/IEC and ITU-T. Recently, the development of two contenders for the next generation of standardized video codecs began: ISO/IEC and ITU-T advance the development of the Joint Exploration Model (JEM), a possible successor of HEVC, while the Alliance for Open Media pushes forward the video codec AV1. It is asserted by both groups that their codecs achieve superior coding efficiency over the state-of-the-art. In this paper, we discuss the distinguishing features of JEM and AV1 and evaluate their coding efficiency and computational complexity under well-defined and balanced test conditions. Our main findings are that JEM considerably outperforms HM and AV1 in terms of coding efficiency while AV1 cannot transform increased complexity into competitiveness in terms of coding efficiency with neither of the competitors except for the all-intra configuration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS)\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCS.2018.8456291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PCS.2018.8456291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

目前最先进的标准化视频编解码器是由ISO/IEC和ITU-T联合开发的高效视频编码(HEVC)。最近,两个下一代标准化视频编解码器竞争者的开发开始了:ISO/IEC和ITU-T推进联合探索模型(JEM)的开发,这可能是HEVC的继任者,而开放媒体联盟则推动视频编解码器AV1的开发。这两组都声称他们的编解码器比最先进的编解码器具有更高的编码效率。本文讨论了JEM和AV1的区别特征,并在定义良好且平衡的测试条件下评估了它们的编码效率和计算复杂度。我们的主要发现是JEM在编码效率方面明显优于HM和AV1,而AV1在编码效率方面不能将增加的复杂性转化为竞争对手,除了全intra配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison of JEM and AV1 with HEVC: Coding Tools, Coding Efficiency and Complexity
The current state-of-the-art for standardized video codecs is High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) which was developed jointly by ISO/IEC and ITU-T. Recently, the development of two contenders for the next generation of standardized video codecs began: ISO/IEC and ITU-T advance the development of the Joint Exploration Model (JEM), a possible successor of HEVC, while the Alliance for Open Media pushes forward the video codec AV1. It is asserted by both groups that their codecs achieve superior coding efficiency over the state-of-the-art. In this paper, we discuss the distinguishing features of JEM and AV1 and evaluate their coding efficiency and computational complexity under well-defined and balanced test conditions. Our main findings are that JEM considerably outperforms HM and AV1 in terms of coding efficiency while AV1 cannot transform increased complexity into competitiveness in terms of coding efficiency with neither of the competitors except for the all-intra configuration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Future Video Coding Technologies: A Performance Evaluation of AV1, JEM, VP9, and HM Joint Optimization of Rate, Distortion, and Maximum Absolute Error for Compression of Medical Volumes Using HEVC Intra Wavelet Decomposition Pre-processing for Spatial Scalability Video Compression Scheme Detecting Source Video Artifacts with Supervised Sparse Filters Perceptually-Aligned Frame Rate Selection Using Spatio-Temporal Features
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1