通过安达拉斯大学机械工程系工程设计专业激发学生设计创造力的策略

E. Satria, D. Chandra
{"title":"通过安达拉斯大学机械工程系工程设计专业激发学生设计创造力的策略","authors":"E. Satria, D. Chandra","doi":"10.4108/eai.11-9-2019.2298480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This paper investigates application of several design techniques to stimulate student’s creativity in design of engineering products. The first technique is creative methods,such as brainstorming, synetics, enlarging the search space, while the second technique is rational methods such as objective tree, function analysis, quality function deployment, morphological chart, weighted objective and value engineering method. Both techniques have been previously taught in the subject of Engineering Design, one of required subject in Department of Mechanical Engineering of Andalas University, for 3 rd year students.All methods above, whether creative methods or rational methods,theoretically could be used to stimulate the creativity of the students in the design process. The creativity is assessed through application of analytical rubrics in four criteria of assessment. Those are variety of ideas and context, variety of sources, combining ideas, and communicating something new. The result shows that under scale of 1 to 4, the level creativity for four criteria of assesment are 2.93, 2.79, 2.5 and 2.15 respectively. In general, the average level of creativity is 2.59, somewhere between category of Creative (Scale 3) and Ordinary (Scale 2).","PeriodicalId":406188,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance, ICED-QA 2019, 11 September 2019, Padang, Indonesia","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategy to Stimulate Student’s Creativity in Design through Subject of Engineering Design in Department of Mechanical Engineering of Andalas University\",\"authors\":\"E. Satria, D. Chandra\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/eai.11-9-2019.2298480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". This paper investigates application of several design techniques to stimulate student’s creativity in design of engineering products. The first technique is creative methods,such as brainstorming, synetics, enlarging the search space, while the second technique is rational methods such as objective tree, function analysis, quality function deployment, morphological chart, weighted objective and value engineering method. Both techniques have been previously taught in the subject of Engineering Design, one of required subject in Department of Mechanical Engineering of Andalas University, for 3 rd year students.All methods above, whether creative methods or rational methods,theoretically could be used to stimulate the creativity of the students in the design process. The creativity is assessed through application of analytical rubrics in four criteria of assessment. Those are variety of ideas and context, variety of sources, combining ideas, and communicating something new. The result shows that under scale of 1 to 4, the level creativity for four criteria of assesment are 2.93, 2.79, 2.5 and 2.15 respectively. In general, the average level of creativity is 2.59, somewhere between category of Creative (Scale 3) and Ordinary (Scale 2).\",\"PeriodicalId\":406188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance, ICED-QA 2019, 11 September 2019, Padang, Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance, ICED-QA 2019, 11 September 2019, Padang, Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.11-9-2019.2298480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance, ICED-QA 2019, 11 September 2019, Padang, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.11-9-2019.2298480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

. 本文探讨了几种设计技术在工程产品设计中的应用,以激发学生的创造力。一是创造性方法,如头脑风暴法、综合法、扩大搜索空间等;二是理性方法,如目标树法、功能分析法、质量功能展开法、形态图法、加权目标法、价值工程法等。这两种技术都曾在安达拉斯大学机械工程系大三必修课程之一的工程设计课程中教授过。以上所有方法,无论是创造性的方法还是理性的方法,理论上都可以用来激发学生在设计过程中的创造力。通过在四个评估标准中应用分析准则来评估创造力。这些是各种各样的想法和背景,各种各样的来源,结合想法,交流新的东西。结果表明,在1 ~ 4级量表下,四个评价标准的创造力水平分别为2.93、2.79、2.5和2.15。一般来说,创造力的平均水平是2.59,介于创造性(量表3)和普通(量表2)之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategy to Stimulate Student’s Creativity in Design through Subject of Engineering Design in Department of Mechanical Engineering of Andalas University
. This paper investigates application of several design techniques to stimulate student’s creativity in design of engineering products. The first technique is creative methods,such as brainstorming, synetics, enlarging the search space, while the second technique is rational methods such as objective tree, function analysis, quality function deployment, morphological chart, weighted objective and value engineering method. Both techniques have been previously taught in the subject of Engineering Design, one of required subject in Department of Mechanical Engineering of Andalas University, for 3 rd year students.All methods above, whether creative methods or rational methods,theoretically could be used to stimulate the creativity of the students in the design process. The creativity is assessed through application of analytical rubrics in four criteria of assessment. Those are variety of ideas and context, variety of sources, combining ideas, and communicating something new. The result shows that under scale of 1 to 4, the level creativity for four criteria of assesment are 2.93, 2.79, 2.5 and 2.15 respectively. In general, the average level of creativity is 2.59, somewhere between category of Creative (Scale 3) and Ordinary (Scale 2).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strategy to Stimulate Student’s Creativity in Design through Subject of Engineering Design in Department of Mechanical Engineering of Andalas University Application of Blended Learning Method to Effective and Efficiency Learning on Subject Basic of Management Blended Learning in Mathematical Statistics I Development of Electronic Learning Methods Using the Project-Based Learning Method Flipped Class Contributes to the Development of Awareness Centered Learning and Helps the Linguistic Students Create Their Own Innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1