静电放电损伤网眼的机理研究

J. Montoya, L. Levit, A. Englisch
{"title":"静电放电损伤网眼的机理研究","authors":"J. Montoya, L. Levit, A. Englisch","doi":"10.1109/6104.930957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reticles were exposed to the fringing field from an electrode biased to a high voltage. The reticles in the study included special reticles intended to benchmark the ESD hazard of a photobay and production reticles of a variety of feature sizes. It was found that without any electrical contact between the reticle and the electrode, reticle damage could be done. A wide bandwidth transient-EMI sensing antenna revealed that the reticle sparked when a voltage as low as 2000 V was applied to the electrode. The tests showed that the ESD threshold of reticles with smaller feature sizes was lower than for reticles with larger feature sizes. Reticles were scanned under a microscope for reticle damage. It was found that when the voltage was ramped to 17 kV and returned to zero, damage to the reticle was observed. When a voltage of 7.5 kV was applied once, no damage was observed but when it was applied 100 times, reticle damage was observed. This study confirms that ESD damage is done to a reticle by charged objects in the vicinity of the reticle in contrast with the prevailing belief that reticle damage is done only by charged reticles. The study also showed that reticles can be sufficiently damaged to cause printing errors due to the accumulated damage caused by repeated low level exposure to the fringing field of a charged object in the vicinity of the reticle.","PeriodicalId":332394,"journal":{"name":"Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium Proceedings 2000 (IEEE Cat. No.00TH8476)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study of the mechanisms for ESD damage to reticles\",\"authors\":\"J. Montoya, L. Levit, A. Englisch\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/6104.930957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reticles were exposed to the fringing field from an electrode biased to a high voltage. The reticles in the study included special reticles intended to benchmark the ESD hazard of a photobay and production reticles of a variety of feature sizes. It was found that without any electrical contact between the reticle and the electrode, reticle damage could be done. A wide bandwidth transient-EMI sensing antenna revealed that the reticle sparked when a voltage as low as 2000 V was applied to the electrode. The tests showed that the ESD threshold of reticles with smaller feature sizes was lower than for reticles with larger feature sizes. Reticles were scanned under a microscope for reticle damage. It was found that when the voltage was ramped to 17 kV and returned to zero, damage to the reticle was observed. When a voltage of 7.5 kV was applied once, no damage was observed but when it was applied 100 times, reticle damage was observed. This study confirms that ESD damage is done to a reticle by charged objects in the vicinity of the reticle in contrast with the prevailing belief that reticle damage is done only by charged reticles. The study also showed that reticles can be sufficiently damaged to cause printing errors due to the accumulated damage caused by repeated low level exposure to the fringing field of a charged object in the vicinity of the reticle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium Proceedings 2000 (IEEE Cat. No.00TH8476)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium Proceedings 2000 (IEEE Cat. No.00TH8476)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/6104.930957\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium Proceedings 2000 (IEEE Cat. No.00TH8476)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/6104.930957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

从偏置到高电压的电极中,光圈暴露在边缘场中。研究中使用的光柱包括用于测试光电舱ESD危害的特殊光柱和各种特征尺寸的生产光柱。研究发现,在不与电极接触的情况下,会对电极造成损伤。宽带宽瞬态电磁干扰感应天线显示,当低至2000 V的电压施加到电极上时,十字线触发。实验表明,特征尺寸较小的线的ESD阈值低于特征尺寸较大的线的ESD阈值。在显微镜下扫描网架,检查网架损伤情况。结果发现,当电压上升到17千伏并恢复到零时,观察到光栅的损坏。当施加一次7.5 kV电压时,没有观察到损伤,但当施加100次时,观察到网状损伤。这项研究证实,静电放电损伤是由附近的带电物体造成的,这与普遍认为的仅由带电物体造成的损伤形成了对比。该研究还表明,由于反复低水平暴露在十字线附近带电物体的边缘场中,所造成的累积损伤会使十字线受到足够的损伤,从而导致打印错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A study of the mechanisms for ESD damage to reticles
Reticles were exposed to the fringing field from an electrode biased to a high voltage. The reticles in the study included special reticles intended to benchmark the ESD hazard of a photobay and production reticles of a variety of feature sizes. It was found that without any electrical contact between the reticle and the electrode, reticle damage could be done. A wide bandwidth transient-EMI sensing antenna revealed that the reticle sparked when a voltage as low as 2000 V was applied to the electrode. The tests showed that the ESD threshold of reticles with smaller feature sizes was lower than for reticles with larger feature sizes. Reticles were scanned under a microscope for reticle damage. It was found that when the voltage was ramped to 17 kV and returned to zero, damage to the reticle was observed. When a voltage of 7.5 kV was applied once, no damage was observed but when it was applied 100 times, reticle damage was observed. This study confirms that ESD damage is done to a reticle by charged objects in the vicinity of the reticle in contrast with the prevailing belief that reticle damage is done only by charged reticles. The study also showed that reticles can be sufficiently damaged to cause printing errors due to the accumulated damage caused by repeated low level exposure to the fringing field of a charged object in the vicinity of the reticle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ESD damage thresholds: history and prognosis [magnetic heads] Electrostatic discharge characterization of epitaxial-base silicon-germanium heterojunction bipolar transistors A study of static-dissipative tweezers for handling giant magneto-resistive recording heads A study of the mechanisms for ESD damage to reticles Floating gate EEPROM as EOS indicators during wafer-level GMR processing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1