监管对内幕交易数量、时机和盈利能力的影响

I. Lee, M. Lemmon, Yan Li, J. M. Sequeira
{"title":"监管对内幕交易数量、时机和盈利能力的影响","authors":"I. Lee, M. Lemmon, Yan Li, J. M. Sequeira","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1824185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we investigate the timing, volume, and profitability of insider trading has changed over time corresponding to changes in the regulatory environment over the period 1986-2008. Consistent with increased regulatory scrutiny, we find that there has been a steady increase over time in the proportion of trades by insiders that occur right after quarterly earnings announcements, and that more and more firms appear to adopt policies to restrict their insider trading. Along with these changes in the timing of insider transactions, we provide evidence that the overall informativeness of insider trading has also decreased over time, and that the profitability of insider trading completely disappears in the post-2002 period following the implementation of SOX. Examining firms with restrictions on insider trading, we find that insiders in these firms continue to take advantage of positive information but are more careful in exploiting negative information. The results suggest that insiders react strategically to changes in the regulatory environment.","PeriodicalId":302242,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Regulation (Topic)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Regulation on the Volume, Timing, and Profitability of Insider Trading\",\"authors\":\"I. Lee, M. Lemmon, Yan Li, J. M. Sequeira\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1824185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we investigate the timing, volume, and profitability of insider trading has changed over time corresponding to changes in the regulatory environment over the period 1986-2008. Consistent with increased regulatory scrutiny, we find that there has been a steady increase over time in the proportion of trades by insiders that occur right after quarterly earnings announcements, and that more and more firms appear to adopt policies to restrict their insider trading. Along with these changes in the timing of insider transactions, we provide evidence that the overall informativeness of insider trading has also decreased over time, and that the profitability of insider trading completely disappears in the post-2002 period following the implementation of SOX. Examining firms with restrictions on insider trading, we find that insiders in these firms continue to take advantage of positive information but are more careful in exploiting negative information. The results suggest that insiders react strategically to changes in the regulatory environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Regulation (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Regulation (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1824185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Regulation (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1824185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文研究了1986-2008年间,随着监管环境的变化,内幕交易的时间、数量和盈利能力随时间的变化。随着监管审查的加强,我们发现,随着时间的推移,在季度收益公布后发生的内幕交易比例稳步上升,而且越来越多的公司似乎采取了限制内幕交易的政策。随着内幕交易发生时间的变化,我们提供的证据表明,内幕交易的总体信息量也随着时间的推移而下降,内幕交易的盈利能力在2002年后实施SOX之后完全消失。通过对限制内幕交易的公司的研究,我们发现这些公司的内部人员继续利用正面信息,但在利用负面信息方面更加谨慎。研究结果表明,内部人士对监管环境的变化做出了战略性反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Regulation on the Volume, Timing, and Profitability of Insider Trading
In this paper, we investigate the timing, volume, and profitability of insider trading has changed over time corresponding to changes in the regulatory environment over the period 1986-2008. Consistent with increased regulatory scrutiny, we find that there has been a steady increase over time in the proportion of trades by insiders that occur right after quarterly earnings announcements, and that more and more firms appear to adopt policies to restrict their insider trading. Along with these changes in the timing of insider transactions, we provide evidence that the overall informativeness of insider trading has also decreased over time, and that the profitability of insider trading completely disappears in the post-2002 period following the implementation of SOX. Examining firms with restrictions on insider trading, we find that insiders in these firms continue to take advantage of positive information but are more careful in exploiting negative information. The results suggest that insiders react strategically to changes in the regulatory environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Incentives and Communication Costs on Information Production and Use: Evidence from Bank Lending Reserves, Liquidity and Money: An Assessment of Balance Sheet Policies State Aid to Business in the European Union: A Focus on the Car Sector A Conceptual Framework for Efficient Design of Counter-Obligations in Government Contracts and Licenses Banks’ Reactions to Basel-III
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1