{"title":"转型的艺术:拉丁美洲文化与新自由主义危机(评论)","authors":"P. Dove","doi":"10.5860/choice.39-3869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Francine Masiello’s The Art of Transition: Latin American Culture and Neoliberal Crisis offers a broad reflection on contemporary cultural production in Argentina and Chile, with particular attention to ways in which literature confronts problems associated with these two countries’ recent transitions from dictatorships to free market– based democracies. Masiello’s discussion presupposes that the transitions of the 1980s perpetuated—and in some respects deepened—the traumatic wounds suffered by Southern Cone societies in the 1970s under military dictatorship. Transition is experienced as crisis on at least two counts. On the one hand, these postdictatorship democracies have failed to pursue justice for the crimes committed under dictatorship, opting instead for the pragmatic mode of reconciliation evoked by Chilean president Patricio Aylwin’s axiomatic phrase, “justicia en la medida de lo posible.” Memories of repression and terror thus exist in an antagonistic relation with de facto and de jure impunity for military criminals. On the other hand, the total identification of democracy with a neoliberal model during the transition is seen by many as the ultimate political legitimation of a project initiated a decade earlier at gunpoint. The enforcement of free-market structural adjustments during the transition has been viewed as a principle cause of increasing social fragmentation, as well as the confirmation that previous generations’ dreams of social justice have been destroyed. For many, the transition is associated with a profound and sweeping loss of sense, a loss that casts its shadow on the very possibility of shared meaning. Masiello’s book should also be read in the context of recent academic debates about the status of “literature” today. In recent years there has been an increasing sentiment in Latin Americanist circles that literature","PeriodicalId":343953,"journal":{"name":"Nepantla: Views from South","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Art of Transition: Latin American Culture and Neoliberal Crisis (review)\",\"authors\":\"P. Dove\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.39-3869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Francine Masiello’s The Art of Transition: Latin American Culture and Neoliberal Crisis offers a broad reflection on contemporary cultural production in Argentina and Chile, with particular attention to ways in which literature confronts problems associated with these two countries’ recent transitions from dictatorships to free market– based democracies. Masiello’s discussion presupposes that the transitions of the 1980s perpetuated—and in some respects deepened—the traumatic wounds suffered by Southern Cone societies in the 1970s under military dictatorship. Transition is experienced as crisis on at least two counts. On the one hand, these postdictatorship democracies have failed to pursue justice for the crimes committed under dictatorship, opting instead for the pragmatic mode of reconciliation evoked by Chilean president Patricio Aylwin’s axiomatic phrase, “justicia en la medida de lo posible.” Memories of repression and terror thus exist in an antagonistic relation with de facto and de jure impunity for military criminals. On the other hand, the total identification of democracy with a neoliberal model during the transition is seen by many as the ultimate political legitimation of a project initiated a decade earlier at gunpoint. The enforcement of free-market structural adjustments during the transition has been viewed as a principle cause of increasing social fragmentation, as well as the confirmation that previous generations’ dreams of social justice have been destroyed. For many, the transition is associated with a profound and sweeping loss of sense, a loss that casts its shadow on the very possibility of shared meaning. Masiello’s book should also be read in the context of recent academic debates about the status of “literature” today. In recent years there has been an increasing sentiment in Latin Americanist circles that literature\",\"PeriodicalId\":343953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nepantla: Views from South\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nepantla: Views from South\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.39-3869\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepantla: Views from South","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.39-3869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Francine Masiello的《过渡的艺术:拉丁美洲文化和新自由主义危机》对阿根廷和智利的当代文化生产进行了广泛的反思,特别关注了文学面对这两个国家最近从独裁统治向自由市场民主国家过渡的相关问题的方式。Masiello的讨论预设了上世纪80年代的过渡延续了——在某些方面加深了——南锥体社会在上世纪70年代军事独裁统治下所遭受的创伤。至少在两个方面,转型是一场危机。一方面,这些后独裁民主国家未能为独裁统治下犯下的罪行寻求正义,而是选择了智利总统帕特里西奥·艾尔温(Patricio Aylwin)的公理短语“justicia en la medida de lomaybe”所引发的务实和解模式。因此,镇压和恐怖的记忆与军事罪犯在事实上和法律上不受惩罚是对立的关系。另一方面,在转型过程中,民主与新自由主义模式的完全认同被许多人视为十年前在枪口下发起的项目的最终政治合法性。在过渡期间实施自由市场结构调整被视为社会日益分裂的主要原因,也证实了前几代人的社会正义梦想已被摧毁。对许多人来说,这种转变与深刻而全面的理智丧失有关,这种丧失给共享意义的可能性蒙上了阴影。马西洛的书也应该放在最近关于“文学”地位的学术辩论的背景下阅读。近年来,在拉丁美洲文学界,越来越多的人认为文学
The Art of Transition: Latin American Culture and Neoliberal Crisis (review)
Francine Masiello’s The Art of Transition: Latin American Culture and Neoliberal Crisis offers a broad reflection on contemporary cultural production in Argentina and Chile, with particular attention to ways in which literature confronts problems associated with these two countries’ recent transitions from dictatorships to free market– based democracies. Masiello’s discussion presupposes that the transitions of the 1980s perpetuated—and in some respects deepened—the traumatic wounds suffered by Southern Cone societies in the 1970s under military dictatorship. Transition is experienced as crisis on at least two counts. On the one hand, these postdictatorship democracies have failed to pursue justice for the crimes committed under dictatorship, opting instead for the pragmatic mode of reconciliation evoked by Chilean president Patricio Aylwin’s axiomatic phrase, “justicia en la medida de lo posible.” Memories of repression and terror thus exist in an antagonistic relation with de facto and de jure impunity for military criminals. On the other hand, the total identification of democracy with a neoliberal model during the transition is seen by many as the ultimate political legitimation of a project initiated a decade earlier at gunpoint. The enforcement of free-market structural adjustments during the transition has been viewed as a principle cause of increasing social fragmentation, as well as the confirmation that previous generations’ dreams of social justice have been destroyed. For many, the transition is associated with a profound and sweeping loss of sense, a loss that casts its shadow on the very possibility of shared meaning. Masiello’s book should also be read in the context of recent academic debates about the status of “literature” today. In recent years there has been an increasing sentiment in Latin Americanist circles that literature