新西兰电力行业治理的分权与再集权

R. Meade
{"title":"新西兰电力行业治理的分权与再集权","authors":"R. Meade","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.895467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For much of the twentieth century electricity generation and transmission in New Zealand was dominated by centralized state ownership and control with local authority ownership of distribution and retailing. Radical reform of the sector commenced in the early 1980s with the progressive corporatisation and unbundling of these sub-sectors limited privatizations and a shift towards \"light-handed\" non-industry specific regulation. These reforms contained inherent tensions that quickly manifested themselves in a political stand-off over the electricity price path required to support new generation investment. In turn this standoff spurred the industry-led development of a voluntary self-governing wholesale electricity market. With a change of government in 1999 increasing re-centralization of industry governance and regulation resulted in part justified on the grounds of winter power \"crises\" in 2001 and 2003 involving significant wholesale electricity price spikes (although blackouts were a regular and more disruptive occurrence prior to the reforms). With the return to centralized industry governance and shift towards heavy-handed regulation - but now with greater private sector investment in the sector - system supply and security issues persist and questions remain over the likely effect of these policy reversals on required new investment.","PeriodicalId":302242,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Regulation (Topic)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decentralization and Re-Centralization of Electricity Industry Governance in New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"R. Meade\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.895467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For much of the twentieth century electricity generation and transmission in New Zealand was dominated by centralized state ownership and control with local authority ownership of distribution and retailing. Radical reform of the sector commenced in the early 1980s with the progressive corporatisation and unbundling of these sub-sectors limited privatizations and a shift towards \\\"light-handed\\\" non-industry specific regulation. These reforms contained inherent tensions that quickly manifested themselves in a political stand-off over the electricity price path required to support new generation investment. In turn this standoff spurred the industry-led development of a voluntary self-governing wholesale electricity market. With a change of government in 1999 increasing re-centralization of industry governance and regulation resulted in part justified on the grounds of winter power \\\"crises\\\" in 2001 and 2003 involving significant wholesale electricity price spikes (although blackouts were a regular and more disruptive occurrence prior to the reforms). With the return to centralized industry governance and shift towards heavy-handed regulation - but now with greater private sector investment in the sector - system supply and security issues persist and questions remain over the likely effect of these policy reversals on required new investment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Regulation (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Regulation (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.895467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Regulation (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.895467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在20世纪的大部分时间里,新西兰的发电和输电由国家集中所有和控制,地方当局拥有分销和零售的所有权。该部门的激进改革始于20世纪80年代初,随着这些分部门的逐步公司化和分拆,有限的私有化和转向“宽松的”非行业特定监管。这些改革包含着内在的紧张关系,这种紧张关系很快表现为围绕支持新一代投资所需的电价路径的政治对峙。反过来,这种僵局刺激了行业主导的自愿自治的批发电力市场的发展。随着1999年政府的更迭,越来越多的行业治理和监管重新集中,导致2001年和2003年冬季电力“危机”的部分理由是合理的,其中包括大量批发电价飙升(尽管在改革之前,停电是经常发生的,更具破坏性)。随着集中式行业治理的回归和向严厉监管的转变——但现在私营部门对该行业的投资增加了——系统供应和安全问题依然存在,这些政策逆转对所需的新投资可能产生的影响仍然存在疑问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decentralization and Re-Centralization of Electricity Industry Governance in New Zealand
For much of the twentieth century electricity generation and transmission in New Zealand was dominated by centralized state ownership and control with local authority ownership of distribution and retailing. Radical reform of the sector commenced in the early 1980s with the progressive corporatisation and unbundling of these sub-sectors limited privatizations and a shift towards "light-handed" non-industry specific regulation. These reforms contained inherent tensions that quickly manifested themselves in a political stand-off over the electricity price path required to support new generation investment. In turn this standoff spurred the industry-led development of a voluntary self-governing wholesale electricity market. With a change of government in 1999 increasing re-centralization of industry governance and regulation resulted in part justified on the grounds of winter power "crises" in 2001 and 2003 involving significant wholesale electricity price spikes (although blackouts were a regular and more disruptive occurrence prior to the reforms). With the return to centralized industry governance and shift towards heavy-handed regulation - but now with greater private sector investment in the sector - system supply and security issues persist and questions remain over the likely effect of these policy reversals on required new investment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Incentives and Communication Costs on Information Production and Use: Evidence from Bank Lending Reserves, Liquidity and Money: An Assessment of Balance Sheet Policies State Aid to Business in the European Union: A Focus on the Car Sector A Conceptual Framework for Efficient Design of Counter-Obligations in Government Contracts and Licenses Banks’ Reactions to Basel-III
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1