以论证为导向的探究模式开发实验作业,以提高学生的论证技巧

N. Hasnunidah, U. Rosidin
{"title":"以论证为导向的探究模式开发实验作业,以提高学生的论证技巧","authors":"N. Hasnunidah, U. Rosidin","doi":"10.2991/ICETEP-18.2019.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Successful investigation in the laboratory was \nsupported by a student worksheet. This study aims to measures the validity and effectiveness of laboratory worksheet on a topic the Excretory Systems in Humans that has been developed based on the Argument-Driven Inquiry Model. The result of the research shows that the laboratory worksheet is proper to use aslearning resource that validity average is 84.25% are considered theoretically feasible and student response average is 96.40% is considered very good. Improvement of argumentation skill is shown with gain scores of 0.43.","PeriodicalId":220496,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018)","volume":"482 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Laboratory Worksheet with Argument-Driven Inquiry Model to Enhance the Student's Argumentation Skills\",\"authors\":\"N. Hasnunidah, U. Rosidin\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/ICETEP-18.2019.54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Successful investigation in the laboratory was \\nsupported by a student worksheet. This study aims to measures the validity and effectiveness of laboratory worksheet on a topic the Excretory Systems in Humans that has been developed based on the Argument-Driven Inquiry Model. The result of the research shows that the laboratory worksheet is proper to use aslearning resource that validity average is 84.25% are considered theoretically feasible and student response average is 96.40% is considered very good. Improvement of argumentation skill is shown with gain scores of 0.43.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018)\",\"volume\":\"482 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICETEP-18.2019.54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICETEP-18.2019.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在实验室的成功调查得到了学生工作表的支持。本研究旨在测量实验室工作表的有效性和有效性,该工作表的主题是基于论证驱动的调查模型开发的人类排泄系统。研究结果表明,实验工作表作为学习资源是合适的,效度平均值为84.25%,认为理论上可行,学生反应平均值为96.40%,认为非常好。论证能力的提高,得分为0.43。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of Laboratory Worksheet with Argument-Driven Inquiry Model to Enhance the Student's Argumentation Skills
Successful investigation in the laboratory was supported by a student worksheet. This study aims to measures the validity and effectiveness of laboratory worksheet on a topic the Excretory Systems in Humans that has been developed based on the Argument-Driven Inquiry Model. The result of the research shows that the laboratory worksheet is proper to use aslearning resource that validity average is 84.25% are considered theoretically feasible and student response average is 96.40% is considered very good. Improvement of argumentation skill is shown with gain scores of 0.43.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethnomathematics and Outdoor Learning to Improve Problem Solving Ability Abstract Thesis Analysis in Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching Fields Character Education through People's Story Increasing Self-efficacy through Inclusive Education for Autistic Children The Relationship between Motivation, Engagement and Performance of Employee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1