用OpenFOAM进行减摇舱强迫运动动力学数值模拟

V. R. Bernal-Colio, J. Cercos-Pita, J. Calderon-Sanchez, H. R. Díaz-Ojeda, Ricardo Abad, A. Souto-Iglesias
{"title":"用OpenFOAM进行减摇舱强迫运动动力学数值模拟","authors":"V. R. Bernal-Colio, J. Cercos-Pita, J. Calderon-Sanchez, H. R. Díaz-Ojeda, Ricardo Abad, A. Souto-Iglesias","doi":"10.1115/OMAE2018-77609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this work is to approach the full design of an anti-roll tank through numerical simulation, looking for the way to minimize the computational cost. The results have been validated with experiments from a rectangular tank, a tank with a C-shaped section and a rectangular tank with baffles. These tests were performed for 3 and 6 degrees of roll, and for different levels of water inside. The Open Source Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) tool OpenFOAM has been used to carry out the simulations and to validate the numerical model. We have worked in 3D testing different turbulence models (laminar, k-ε, k-ω, k-ω SST) and different boundary conditions (fixed values or slip). Convergence analyses of different meshes have also been performed. After filtering the outcomes, it is shown that the model k-ω SST with slip boundary estimation is the most reliable model.","PeriodicalId":106551,"journal":{"name":"Volume 9: Offshore Geotechnics; Honoring Symposium for Professor Bernard Molin on Marine and Offshore Hydrodynamics","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Modeling of the Forced Motion Dynamics of Antiroll Tank With OpenFOAM\",\"authors\":\"V. R. Bernal-Colio, J. Cercos-Pita, J. Calderon-Sanchez, H. R. Díaz-Ojeda, Ricardo Abad, A. Souto-Iglesias\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/OMAE2018-77609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this work is to approach the full design of an anti-roll tank through numerical simulation, looking for the way to minimize the computational cost. The results have been validated with experiments from a rectangular tank, a tank with a C-shaped section and a rectangular tank with baffles. These tests were performed for 3 and 6 degrees of roll, and for different levels of water inside. The Open Source Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) tool OpenFOAM has been used to carry out the simulations and to validate the numerical model. We have worked in 3D testing different turbulence models (laminar, k-ε, k-ω, k-ω SST) and different boundary conditions (fixed values or slip). Convergence analyses of different meshes have also been performed. After filtering the outcomes, it is shown that the model k-ω SST with slip boundary estimation is the most reliable model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 9: Offshore Geotechnics; Honoring Symposium for Professor Bernard Molin on Marine and Offshore Hydrodynamics\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 9: Offshore Geotechnics; Honoring Symposium for Professor Bernard Molin on Marine and Offshore Hydrodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2018-77609\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 9: Offshore Geotechnics; Honoring Symposium for Professor Bernard Molin on Marine and Offshore Hydrodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2018-77609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是通过数值模拟的方法来接近防侧倾油箱的整体设计,寻找使计算成本最小化的方法。通过矩形槽、c形槽和带挡板矩形槽的实验验证了结果。这些测试分别针对3度和6度的倾斜度以及不同的内部水位进行。使用开源计算流体动力学(CFD)工具OpenFOAM进行了模拟并验证了数值模型。我们在三维测试了不同的湍流模型(层流,k-ε, k-ω, k-ω海表温度)和不同的边界条件(固定值或滑移)。并对不同网格的收敛性进行了分析。对结果进行滤波后,结果表明带滑动边界估计的k-ω海表温度模型是最可靠的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Numerical Modeling of the Forced Motion Dynamics of Antiroll Tank With OpenFOAM
The aim of this work is to approach the full design of an anti-roll tank through numerical simulation, looking for the way to minimize the computational cost. The results have been validated with experiments from a rectangular tank, a tank with a C-shaped section and a rectangular tank with baffles. These tests were performed for 3 and 6 degrees of roll, and for different levels of water inside. The Open Source Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) tool OpenFOAM has been used to carry out the simulations and to validate the numerical model. We have worked in 3D testing different turbulence models (laminar, k-ε, k-ω, k-ω SST) and different boundary conditions (fixed values or slip). Convergence analyses of different meshes have also been performed. After filtering the outcomes, it is shown that the model k-ω SST with slip boundary estimation is the most reliable model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental Study of Water Cutoff Performance of Steel Pipe Sheet Piles With Interlocked Joint Field Study on the Effects of Impact Frequency on the Axial and Lateral Capacity of Driven Pipe Piles in Sand Scale Model Investigations on Vibro Pile Driving Anchor Sharing in Sands: Centrifuge Modelling and Soil Element Testing to Characterise Multi-Directional Loadings A 2D Experimental and Numerical Study of Moonpools With Recess
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1