Jacinta Aman Lim, B. Dunlap, S. Hong, H. Shin, Byung-Cheol Kim
{"title":"带0.35mm球距6面保护的600mm FOPLP封装可靠性评估","authors":"Jacinta Aman Lim, B. Dunlap, S. Hong, H. Shin, Byung-Cheol Kim","doi":"10.1109/ectc51906.2022.00136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"6-sided die protection on 600mm x 600mm Fan-Out Panel Level Packaging (FOPLP) has emerged as a scale up alternative to 300mm Fan-Out Wafer Level Packaging (FOWLP). In comparison to a 300mm round panel, a 600mm x 600mm panel could fit 5 times more 200mm wafers than a 300mm round panel. The need for migrating to carrier sizes larger than 300mm for FOWLP becomes a necessity to lower down costs and handle higher volumes. Although 600mm FOPLP is in its early stages of adoption by mainstream Wafer Level Packaging (WLP), questions arise on the performance and comparison to its 300mm FOWLP counterpart.As opposed to its 300mm round panel predecessor for 6-sided die protection with mold compound, several material sets used for panel processing had to be revisited such as polymer concentration for thin film and large panel processing for metal deposition such as seed layer and redistribution layers. Affects of photolithography on large panel and subsequent downstream process such as panel backside thinning will need to be considered for overall package reliability.This paper will describe the differences and similarities between 600mm x 600mm FOPLP and 300mm round panel FOWLP utilizing a 6-sided die protection process. We will review the key metrics that affect package reliability such as Fan-Out Ratio, thin film/build up process and scaling up from 300mm round panel FOWLP to 600mm FOPLP. Finally, we will present the package reliability performance between a 300mm FOWLP versus 600mm x 600mm FOPLP.","PeriodicalId":139520,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 72nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Package Reliability Evaluation of 600mm FOPLP with 6-Sided Die Protection with 0.35mm Ball Pitch\",\"authors\":\"Jacinta Aman Lim, B. Dunlap, S. Hong, H. Shin, Byung-Cheol Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ectc51906.2022.00136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"6-sided die protection on 600mm x 600mm Fan-Out Panel Level Packaging (FOPLP) has emerged as a scale up alternative to 300mm Fan-Out Wafer Level Packaging (FOWLP). In comparison to a 300mm round panel, a 600mm x 600mm panel could fit 5 times more 200mm wafers than a 300mm round panel. The need for migrating to carrier sizes larger than 300mm for FOWLP becomes a necessity to lower down costs and handle higher volumes. Although 600mm FOPLP is in its early stages of adoption by mainstream Wafer Level Packaging (WLP), questions arise on the performance and comparison to its 300mm FOWLP counterpart.As opposed to its 300mm round panel predecessor for 6-sided die protection with mold compound, several material sets used for panel processing had to be revisited such as polymer concentration for thin film and large panel processing for metal deposition such as seed layer and redistribution layers. Affects of photolithography on large panel and subsequent downstream process such as panel backside thinning will need to be considered for overall package reliability.This paper will describe the differences and similarities between 600mm x 600mm FOPLP and 300mm round panel FOWLP utilizing a 6-sided die protection process. We will review the key metrics that affect package reliability such as Fan-Out Ratio, thin film/build up process and scaling up from 300mm round panel FOWLP to 600mm FOPLP. Finally, we will present the package reliability performance between a 300mm FOWLP versus 600mm x 600mm FOPLP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":139520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 72nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 72nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ectc51906.2022.00136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 72nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ectc51906.2022.00136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
600mm x 600mm扇出面板级封装(FOPLP)上的6面芯片保护已经成为300mm扇出晶圆级封装(FOWLP)的扩展替代方案。与300mm圆面板相比,600mm x 600mm面板可以容纳5倍于300mm圆面板的200mm晶圆。为了降低成本和处理更高的产量,FOWLP需要迁移到大于300mm的载体尺寸。虽然主流晶圆级封装(WLP)采用600mm FOPLP尚处于早期阶段,但与300mm FOPLP相比,其性能和比较方面仍存在问题。与使用模具化合物保护的300mm圆形面板相比,用于面板加工的几种材料必须重新考虑,例如用于薄膜的聚合物浓度和用于金属沉积(如种子层和再分配层)的大型面板加工。光刻对大型面板和后续下游工艺(如面板背面变薄)的影响将需要考虑整体封装可靠性。本文将描述600mm x 600mm FOPLP和300mm圆面板FOWLP之间的差异和相似之处,利用6面模具保护工艺。我们将回顾影响封装可靠性的关键指标,如扇出比、薄膜/构建工艺以及从300mm圆面板FOPLP扩展到600mm FOPLP。最后,我们将介绍300mm FOPLP与600mm × 600mm FOPLP之间的封装可靠性性能。
Package Reliability Evaluation of 600mm FOPLP with 6-Sided Die Protection with 0.35mm Ball Pitch
6-sided die protection on 600mm x 600mm Fan-Out Panel Level Packaging (FOPLP) has emerged as a scale up alternative to 300mm Fan-Out Wafer Level Packaging (FOWLP). In comparison to a 300mm round panel, a 600mm x 600mm panel could fit 5 times more 200mm wafers than a 300mm round panel. The need for migrating to carrier sizes larger than 300mm for FOWLP becomes a necessity to lower down costs and handle higher volumes. Although 600mm FOPLP is in its early stages of adoption by mainstream Wafer Level Packaging (WLP), questions arise on the performance and comparison to its 300mm FOWLP counterpart.As opposed to its 300mm round panel predecessor for 6-sided die protection with mold compound, several material sets used for panel processing had to be revisited such as polymer concentration for thin film and large panel processing for metal deposition such as seed layer and redistribution layers. Affects of photolithography on large panel and subsequent downstream process such as panel backside thinning will need to be considered for overall package reliability.This paper will describe the differences and similarities between 600mm x 600mm FOPLP and 300mm round panel FOWLP utilizing a 6-sided die protection process. We will review the key metrics that affect package reliability such as Fan-Out Ratio, thin film/build up process and scaling up from 300mm round panel FOWLP to 600mm FOPLP. Finally, we will present the package reliability performance between a 300mm FOWLP versus 600mm x 600mm FOPLP.