{"title":"《Titus Andronicus, Chocolat and I Served the King of England》中的食物色情(Obsluhoval jsem anglick<s:1> krále)","authors":"Estella Ciobanu, Carmen Martinaş Florescu","doi":"10.2478/ewcp-2019-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay studies scenes that focus on food and eating in the films Chocolat (2000) and I Served the King of England (Obsluhoval jsem anglického krále, 2006). To assess whether or not they constitute food porn we compare and contrast such scenes with the description of an unwholesome recipe for cannibalistic eating in Titus Andronicus, which anticipates our contemporary food obsession. At its most basic (and controversial), food porn names the alluring visualisation of certain foodstuffs, which renders food the object of erotically tinged desire. Serving different purposes in the two films, such eroticisation of food can be more than self-referential insofar as it indicates human interactions framed as power relations. Showing chocolate making and eating, in Chocolat, actually visualises a woman’s exertion of power over the women and their husbands in a bigoted French village in 1959, intended to awaken the people’s benumbed desire. Not food proper is the object of desire in the Czech film, but the young woman served up as ocular side dish to the moguls dining in a stylish Prague restaurant before the outburst of WWII. By contrast, food eroticisation is completely absent in Shakespeare; at stake is a verbal (and implicitly visual) concern with the transformation of flesh and body parts into ingredients for seemingly festive consumption. Visualising food, in Titus, implicitly visualises the reclaim and exertion of power in the fictional Roman polity. In all these cases, the concern with food vectorises power relations and may fluidise gendered hierarchies, an issue which food porn scholarship rarely addresses.","PeriodicalId":120501,"journal":{"name":"East-West Cultural Passage","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food Porn in Titus Andronicus, Chocolat and I Served the King of England (Obsluhoval jsem anglického krále)\",\"authors\":\"Estella Ciobanu, Carmen Martinaş Florescu\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/ewcp-2019-0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This essay studies scenes that focus on food and eating in the films Chocolat (2000) and I Served the King of England (Obsluhoval jsem anglického krále, 2006). To assess whether or not they constitute food porn we compare and contrast such scenes with the description of an unwholesome recipe for cannibalistic eating in Titus Andronicus, which anticipates our contemporary food obsession. At its most basic (and controversial), food porn names the alluring visualisation of certain foodstuffs, which renders food the object of erotically tinged desire. Serving different purposes in the two films, such eroticisation of food can be more than self-referential insofar as it indicates human interactions framed as power relations. Showing chocolate making and eating, in Chocolat, actually visualises a woman’s exertion of power over the women and their husbands in a bigoted French village in 1959, intended to awaken the people’s benumbed desire. Not food proper is the object of desire in the Czech film, but the young woman served up as ocular side dish to the moguls dining in a stylish Prague restaurant before the outburst of WWII. By contrast, food eroticisation is completely absent in Shakespeare; at stake is a verbal (and implicitly visual) concern with the transformation of flesh and body parts into ingredients for seemingly festive consumption. Visualising food, in Titus, implicitly visualises the reclaim and exertion of power in the fictional Roman polity. In all these cases, the concern with food vectorises power relations and may fluidise gendered hierarchies, an issue which food porn scholarship rarely addresses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East-West Cultural Passage\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East-West Cultural Passage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/ewcp-2019-0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East-West Cultural Passage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ewcp-2019-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文研究了电影《巧克力》(2000)和《我为英国国王服务》(Obsluhoval jsem anglick, 2006)中关注食物和饮食的场景。为了评估它们是否构成食物色情,我们将这些场景与《提图斯·安德洛尼克斯》(Titus Andronicus)中对一种不健康的食人食谱的描述进行比较和对比,后者预示了我们当代对食物的痴迷。最基本的(也是有争议的)是,食物色情将某些食物诱人的视觉化命名,使食物成为带有色情色彩的欲望的对象。在两部电影中,食物的这种色情化有着不同的目的,它不仅仅是自我指涉,因为它表明了作为权力关系框架的人类互动。在《巧克力》中,展示巧克力的制作和食用,实际上描绘了1959年一个偏执的法国村庄里,一个女人对女人和她们的丈夫行使权力,旨在唤醒人们麻木的欲望。在这部捷克电影中,食物本身并不是人们渴望的对象,但在二战爆发前,在布拉格一家时尚餐厅里,这位年轻女子被当作一道引人注目的小菜。相比之下,莎士比亚的作品中完全没有食物色情;关键在于将肉体和身体部位转化为看似节日消费的食材,这是一种口头上(以及隐含的视觉上)的关注。在《提图斯》中,将食物形象化,隐含地将虚构的罗马政体中权力的收回和运用形象化。在所有这些案例中,对食物的关注使权力关系向矢量化,并可能使性别等级流动化,这是食物色情研究很少涉及的问题。
Food Porn in Titus Andronicus, Chocolat and I Served the King of England (Obsluhoval jsem anglického krále)
Abstract This essay studies scenes that focus on food and eating in the films Chocolat (2000) and I Served the King of England (Obsluhoval jsem anglického krále, 2006). To assess whether or not they constitute food porn we compare and contrast such scenes with the description of an unwholesome recipe for cannibalistic eating in Titus Andronicus, which anticipates our contemporary food obsession. At its most basic (and controversial), food porn names the alluring visualisation of certain foodstuffs, which renders food the object of erotically tinged desire. Serving different purposes in the two films, such eroticisation of food can be more than self-referential insofar as it indicates human interactions framed as power relations. Showing chocolate making and eating, in Chocolat, actually visualises a woman’s exertion of power over the women and their husbands in a bigoted French village in 1959, intended to awaken the people’s benumbed desire. Not food proper is the object of desire in the Czech film, but the young woman served up as ocular side dish to the moguls dining in a stylish Prague restaurant before the outburst of WWII. By contrast, food eroticisation is completely absent in Shakespeare; at stake is a verbal (and implicitly visual) concern with the transformation of flesh and body parts into ingredients for seemingly festive consumption. Visualising food, in Titus, implicitly visualises the reclaim and exertion of power in the fictional Roman polity. In all these cases, the concern with food vectorises power relations and may fluidise gendered hierarchies, an issue which food porn scholarship rarely addresses.