数学中的性别差距:来自中等收入国家的证据

P. Bharadwaj, G. De Giorgi, David R. Hansen, Christopher A. Neilson
{"title":"数学中的性别差距:来自中等收入国家的证据","authors":"P. Bharadwaj, G. De Giorgi, David R. Hansen, Christopher A. Neilson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2587275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a large administrative data set from Chile, we find that, on average, boys perform better than girls in mathematics. In this paper, we document several features of their relative performance. First, we note that the gender gap appears to increase with age (it doubles between fourth grade and eighth grade). Second, we test whether commonly proposed explanations such as parental background and investment in the child, unobserved ability, and classroom environment (including teacher gender) help explain a substantial portion of the gap. While none of these explanations help in explaining a large portion of the gender gap, we show that boys and girls differ significantly in perceptions about their own ability in math. Conditional on math scores, girls are much more likely to state that they dislike math, or find math difficult, compared to boys. We highlight differences in self-assessed ability as areas for future research that might lead to a better understanding of the gender gap in math.","PeriodicalId":424932,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Innovation Research & Policy Education (IRPN) (Topic)","volume":"1248 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Gender Gap in Mathematics: Evidence from a Middle-Income Country\",\"authors\":\"P. Bharadwaj, G. De Giorgi, David R. Hansen, Christopher A. Neilson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2587275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using a large administrative data set from Chile, we find that, on average, boys perform better than girls in mathematics. In this paper, we document several features of their relative performance. First, we note that the gender gap appears to increase with age (it doubles between fourth grade and eighth grade). Second, we test whether commonly proposed explanations such as parental background and investment in the child, unobserved ability, and classroom environment (including teacher gender) help explain a substantial portion of the gap. While none of these explanations help in explaining a large portion of the gender gap, we show that boys and girls differ significantly in perceptions about their own ability in math. Conditional on math scores, girls are much more likely to state that they dislike math, or find math difficult, compared to boys. We highlight differences in self-assessed ability as areas for future research that might lead to a better understanding of the gender gap in math.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EduRN: Innovation Research & Policy Education (IRPN) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1248 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EduRN: Innovation Research & Policy Education (IRPN) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2587275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Innovation Research & Policy Education (IRPN) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2587275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

通过使用来自智利的大型管理数据集,我们发现,平均而言,男孩比女孩在数学方面表现得更好。在本文中,我们记录了它们的相对性能的几个特征。首先,我们注意到性别差距似乎随着年龄的增长而增加(在四年级和八年级之间翻倍)。其次,我们测试了通常提出的解释,如父母背景和对孩子的投资、未被观察到的能力和课堂环境(包括教师性别)是否有助于解释很大一部分差距。虽然这些解释都不能解释性别差异的大部分原因,但我们表明,男孩和女孩在对自己数学能力的看法上存在显著差异。以数学成绩为条件,与男孩相比,女孩更有可能说她们不喜欢数学,或者觉得数学很难。我们强调了自我评估能力的差异,作为未来研究的领域,可能会更好地理解数学方面的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Gender Gap in Mathematics: Evidence from a Middle-Income Country
Using a large administrative data set from Chile, we find that, on average, boys perform better than girls in mathematics. In this paper, we document several features of their relative performance. First, we note that the gender gap appears to increase with age (it doubles between fourth grade and eighth grade). Second, we test whether commonly proposed explanations such as parental background and investment in the child, unobserved ability, and classroom environment (including teacher gender) help explain a substantial portion of the gap. While none of these explanations help in explaining a large portion of the gender gap, we show that boys and girls differ significantly in perceptions about their own ability in math. Conditional on math scores, girls are much more likely to state that they dislike math, or find math difficult, compared to boys. We highlight differences in self-assessed ability as areas for future research that might lead to a better understanding of the gender gap in math.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Directions of the development of youth innovative start-ups in Belarus Intended and Unintended Effects of Public Incentives for Innovation. Quasi-Experimental Evidence From Italy Motivations, Challenges, and Opportunities of Successful Solvers on an Innovation Intermediary Platform Evaluating an Organizational Innovation: Evidence from the Conglomerate Merger Wave Cleveland Clinic Heart Center: a Legacy of Excellence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1