为什么莫尔贝克的威廉不是“他的”《风水》的作者(以及为什么这并没有使文本变得不那么有趣)

Mediterranea. International Journal on the Transfer of Knowledge Pub Date : 2019-03-31 DOI:10.21071/MIJTK.V4I0.11498

P. Beullens

{"title":"为什么莫尔贝克的威廉不是“他的”《风水》的作者(以及为什么这并没有使文本变得不那么有趣)","authors":"P. Beullens","doi":"10.21071/MIJTK.V4I0.11498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The intention of this note is to assess the current tendency to view the Geomantia as a genuine work by William of Moerbeke. While the attribution in the colophons is accepted at face value, other lines of enquiry have remained unexplored. This note advocates the inclusion of linguistic elements and the study of the transmission's cultural background into the debate.","PeriodicalId":212680,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranea. International Journal on the Transfer of Knowledge","volume":"460 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why William of Moerbeke Is Not the Author of ‘His’ 'Geomantia' (And Why That Does Not Make the Text Less Interesting)\",\"authors\":\"P. Beullens\",\"doi\":\"10.21071/MIJTK.V4I0.11498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The intention of this note is to assess the current tendency to view the Geomantia as a genuine work by William of Moerbeke. While the attribution in the colophons is accepted at face value, other lines of enquiry have remained unexplored. This note advocates the inclusion of linguistic elements and the study of the transmission's cultural background into the debate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mediterranea. International Journal on the Transfer of Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"460 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mediterranea. International Journal on the Transfer of Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21071/MIJTK.V4I0.11498\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranea. International Journal on the Transfer of Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21071/MIJTK.V4I0.11498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的目的是评估当前将《Geomantia》视为Moerbeke的William的真迹的趋势。虽然从表面上看，colophons中的归属是可以接受的，但其他方面的调查仍未得到探索。本文主张将语言因素和对传播文化背景的研究纳入辩论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Why William of Moerbeke Is Not the Author of ‘His’ 'Geomantia' (And Why That Does Not Make the Text Less Interesting)

The intention of this note is to assess the current tendency to view the Geomantia as a genuine work by William of Moerbeke. While the attribution in the colophons is accepted at face value, other lines of enquiry have remained unexplored. This note advocates the inclusion of linguistic elements and the study of the transmission's cultural background into the debate.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Mediterranea. International Journal on the Transfer of Knowledge

自引率

0.00%

发文量