弥合鸿沟?

N. Crowther, I. Consultant
{"title":"弥合鸿沟?","authors":"N. Crowther, I. Consultant","doi":"10.33196/JURIDIKUM201902021001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"National equality bodies (NEBs) and national human rights institutions (NHRIs) play important roles in promoting respect for human dignity and fundamental rights in many European states. Both types of body engage in similar activities, perform similar functions, have similar legal powers and seek to achieve similar objectives. However, a number of EU member states have recently established single combined bodies which are designed to perform the functions of both NEBs and NHRIs. The emergence of this new hybrid model of institution – an integrated equality/ human rights body – is a relatively new development in the EU. However, it has received little attention in the academic literature or in official reports. This gap is unfortunate, as the establishment of these new integrated institutions represents an ambitious and interesting attempt to ‘bridge the divide’ between equality and human rights. The challenges they face in giving effect to their integrated equality/human rights mandates tells us something about the extent of this divide. This article looks into the potential and challenges of this hybrid model of institution.","PeriodicalId":281074,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritik - recht - gesellschaft","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the Divide?\",\"authors\":\"N. Crowther, I. Consultant\",\"doi\":\"10.33196/JURIDIKUM201902021001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"National equality bodies (NEBs) and national human rights institutions (NHRIs) play important roles in promoting respect for human dignity and fundamental rights in many European states. Both types of body engage in similar activities, perform similar functions, have similar legal powers and seek to achieve similar objectives. However, a number of EU member states have recently established single combined bodies which are designed to perform the functions of both NEBs and NHRIs. The emergence of this new hybrid model of institution – an integrated equality/ human rights body – is a relatively new development in the EU. However, it has received little attention in the academic literature or in official reports. This gap is unfortunate, as the establishment of these new integrated institutions represents an ambitious and interesting attempt to ‘bridge the divide’ between equality and human rights. The challenges they face in giving effect to their integrated equality/human rights mandates tells us something about the extent of this divide. This article looks into the potential and challenges of this hybrid model of institution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift für kritik - recht - gesellschaft\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift für kritik - recht - gesellschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33196/JURIDIKUM201902021001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für kritik - recht - gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33196/JURIDIKUM201902021001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在许多欧洲国家,国家平等机构(neb)和国家人权机构(NHRIs)在促进尊重人的尊严和基本权利方面发挥重要作用。这两类机构从事类似的活动,履行类似的职能,具有类似的法律权力,并寻求实现类似的目标。然而,一些欧盟成员国最近建立了单一的联合机构,旨在履行国家经济机构和国家人权机构的职能。这种新的机构混合模式的出现——一个综合的平等/人权机构——在欧盟是一个相对较新的发展。然而,在学术文献和官方报告中很少受到关注。这种差距是不幸的,因为这些新的综合机构的建立代表了一种雄心勃勃和有趣的尝试,即“弥合平等与人权之间的鸿沟”。它们在执行其平等/人权综合任务时所面临的挑战向我们说明了这种差距的程度。本文探讨了这种混合制度模式的潜力和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bridging the Divide?
National equality bodies (NEBs) and national human rights institutions (NHRIs) play important roles in promoting respect for human dignity and fundamental rights in many European states. Both types of body engage in similar activities, perform similar functions, have similar legal powers and seek to achieve similar objectives. However, a number of EU member states have recently established single combined bodies which are designed to perform the functions of both NEBs and NHRIs. The emergence of this new hybrid model of institution – an integrated equality/ human rights body – is a relatively new development in the EU. However, it has received little attention in the academic literature or in official reports. This gap is unfortunate, as the establishment of these new integrated institutions represents an ambitious and interesting attempt to ‘bridge the divide’ between equality and human rights. The challenges they face in giving effect to their integrated equality/human rights mandates tells us something about the extent of this divide. This article looks into the potential and challenges of this hybrid model of institution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diskriminierung und Antidiskriminierung Die Klage der Herero und Nama Potentiale der Raumplanung für eine klimafreundliche Mobilität Forschungsbericht: Wer spricht Europarecht? Die Durchsetzung des Anspruches auf Grundversorgung
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1