Ping Liu, Jilin Tan, Zhongyong Zhou, J. Schutt-Ainé, P. Goh
{"title":"依赖源应用程序中两种延迟插入方法的比较","authors":"Ping Liu, Jilin Tan, Zhongyong Zhou, J. Schutt-Ainé, P. Goh","doi":"10.1109/EPEPS.2011.6100250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares two different formulations of the latency insertion method (LIM) for the analysis of circuits with dependent sources. One is the scalar LIM and the other is the amplification matrix LIM. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the scalar LIM necessitates much smaller time step than the amplification matrix LIM when handling certain types of dependent sources indicating better performance of the latter technique without a sacrifice in accuracy.","PeriodicalId":313560,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 20th Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of two latency insertion methods in dependent sources applications\",\"authors\":\"Ping Liu, Jilin Tan, Zhongyong Zhou, J. Schutt-Ainé, P. Goh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EPEPS.2011.6100250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares two different formulations of the latency insertion method (LIM) for the analysis of circuits with dependent sources. One is the scalar LIM and the other is the amplification matrix LIM. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the scalar LIM necessitates much smaller time step than the amplification matrix LIM when handling certain types of dependent sources indicating better performance of the latter technique without a sacrifice in accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 20th Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 20th Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPEPS.2011.6100250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 20th Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPEPS.2011.6100250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparison of two latency insertion methods in dependent sources applications
This paper compares two different formulations of the latency insertion method (LIM) for the analysis of circuits with dependent sources. One is the scalar LIM and the other is the amplification matrix LIM. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the scalar LIM necessitates much smaller time step than the amplification matrix LIM when handling certain types of dependent sources indicating better performance of the latter technique without a sacrifice in accuracy.