{"title":"宗教思想建设过程评价工具的研制","authors":"J. Subando, B. Kartowagiran, S. Munadi","doi":"10.1145/3452144.3452207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to develop an instrument for evaluating the process of strengthening ideology. The research begins with a review of the quality of teacher-student interaction and comprehensive method in value education for the basis of item development. The developed item was validated by 11 experts and was tested limitedly at Al-Irsyad Purwokerto Junior High School by involving 165 students and then expanded at other Junior High Schools in Al Irsyad Cirebon, Surakarta, and Banyuwangi by involving 222 students. Expert assessment data were analyzed by using Aiken's formula, limited trial data were analyzed by factor analysis, and expanded trial data were analyzed by CFA. The research result shows that the factor loading (FL) aspect of emotional support is at the lowest of 0.649 (>0.5), the lowest composite reliability value is 0.7484 (>0.7), and the lowest t-value 3,402 (>1.96 for α=5%). The lowest FL value of the class management aspect is 0.546 (>0.5), the lowest composite reliability is 0.7741 (>0.7), and the lowest t-value 2,752 (>1.96). The FL value for the instructional support aspect is at the lowest of 0.656 (>0.5), the lowest composite reliability value is 0.7652 (>0.7), and the lowest t-value 3,496 (>1.96). Based on the results above, it can be concluded that the item of the ideology strengthening process instrument is valid and reliable so that it can be used as an evaluation tool for the process of strengthening ideology in school.","PeriodicalId":107308,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Development of Instrument for Evaluating The Process of Strengthening Religion Ideology\",\"authors\":\"J. Subando, B. Kartowagiran, S. Munadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3452144.3452207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to develop an instrument for evaluating the process of strengthening ideology. The research begins with a review of the quality of teacher-student interaction and comprehensive method in value education for the basis of item development. The developed item was validated by 11 experts and was tested limitedly at Al-Irsyad Purwokerto Junior High School by involving 165 students and then expanded at other Junior High Schools in Al Irsyad Cirebon, Surakarta, and Banyuwangi by involving 222 students. Expert assessment data were analyzed by using Aiken's formula, limited trial data were analyzed by factor analysis, and expanded trial data were analyzed by CFA. The research result shows that the factor loading (FL) aspect of emotional support is at the lowest of 0.649 (>0.5), the lowest composite reliability value is 0.7484 (>0.7), and the lowest t-value 3,402 (>1.96 for α=5%). The lowest FL value of the class management aspect is 0.546 (>0.5), the lowest composite reliability is 0.7741 (>0.7), and the lowest t-value 2,752 (>1.96). The FL value for the instructional support aspect is at the lowest of 0.656 (>0.5), the lowest composite reliability value is 0.7652 (>0.7), and the lowest t-value 3,496 (>1.96). Based on the results above, it can be concluded that the item of the ideology strengthening process instrument is valid and reliable so that it can be used as an evaluation tool for the process of strengthening ideology in school.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3452207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3452207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
本研究旨在开发一种评估意识形态强化过程的工具。研究首先回顾了价值教育中师生互动的质量和综合方法,作为项目开发的基础。开发的项目经过11位专家的验证,并在Al-Irsyad Purwokerto初中进行了有限的测试,涉及165名学生,然后扩展到Al-Irsyad Cirebon, Surakarta和Banyuwangi的其他初中,涉及222名学生。专家评价资料采用Aiken公式分析,有限试验资料采用因子分析,扩展试验资料采用CFA分析。研究结果表明,情绪支持因子负荷(FL)方面最低为0.649(>0.5),复合信度值最低为0.7484 (>0.7),t值最低为3402 (α=5%时>1.96)。班级管理方面最低FL值为0.546(>0.5),最低复合信度为0.7741(>0.7),最低t值为2752(>1.96)。教学支持方面的FL值最低为0.656(>0.5),复合信度值最低为0.7652 (>0.7),t值最低为3496(>1.96)。综上所述,意识形态强化过程量表项目是有效可靠的,可以作为学校意识形态强化过程的评价工具。
The Development of Instrument for Evaluating The Process of Strengthening Religion Ideology
This research aims to develop an instrument for evaluating the process of strengthening ideology. The research begins with a review of the quality of teacher-student interaction and comprehensive method in value education for the basis of item development. The developed item was validated by 11 experts and was tested limitedly at Al-Irsyad Purwokerto Junior High School by involving 165 students and then expanded at other Junior High Schools in Al Irsyad Cirebon, Surakarta, and Banyuwangi by involving 222 students. Expert assessment data were analyzed by using Aiken's formula, limited trial data were analyzed by factor analysis, and expanded trial data were analyzed by CFA. The research result shows that the factor loading (FL) aspect of emotional support is at the lowest of 0.649 (>0.5), the lowest composite reliability value is 0.7484 (>0.7), and the lowest t-value 3,402 (>1.96 for α=5%). The lowest FL value of the class management aspect is 0.546 (>0.5), the lowest composite reliability is 0.7741 (>0.7), and the lowest t-value 2,752 (>1.96). The FL value for the instructional support aspect is at the lowest of 0.656 (>0.5), the lowest composite reliability value is 0.7652 (>0.7), and the lowest t-value 3,496 (>1.96). Based on the results above, it can be concluded that the item of the ideology strengthening process instrument is valid and reliable so that it can be used as an evaluation tool for the process of strengthening ideology in school.