基于节点与区域定价的电力市场建模差异评估:优化模型与网络表示

L. Jansen, L. Buzna
{"title":"基于节点与区域定价的电力市场建模差异评估:优化模型与网络表示","authors":"L. Jansen, L. Buzna","doi":"10.1109/ICETA51985.2020.9379255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Firstly, this work briefly introduces the Collaborative Doctoral Program (CDP), which fosters collaborations between the Joint Research Centre and Universities, in order to provide a European qualification framework to doctoral students, who are trained to be at the intersect of science and policy through multinational projects. Secondly, this work provides an example of research conducted in the context of the CDP in the field of energy modeling aiming at developing improved modeling tools to assess the efficiency of nodal against zonal pricing and providing evidence for policy-makers. The electricity system is evolving with increasing incorporation of renewable energies, therefore also the transmission system is facing expanding challenges. As a consequence, also electricity markets are evolving. A topic of increasing interest is nodal pricing as an alternative to zonal pricing-based electricity markets in Europe. This work is giving an overview of different formulations of optimization problems in power systems and in particular, in electricity markets, which are commonly applied in literature. We focus on two different aspects being the type of optimization problem and the representation of the transmission network. In this context, the trade-off between modeling accuracy and computational efforts is the topic assessed in this study. We find that computational times increase drastically when employing unit-commitment, but remain rather moderate when sticking to economic dispatch using DC- as well as AC-OPF. The representation of networks in terms of aggregated node systems, which are relevant when aiming to compare zonal to nodal pricing-based electricity markets, show that power flows within zones are difficult to predict and it is vital to further investigate the aggregation of nodes into zones to support comparative studies.","PeriodicalId":149716,"journal":{"name":"2020 18th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Modeling Differences of Nodal vs. Zonal Pricing Based Electricity Markets: Optimization Models and Network Representation\",\"authors\":\"L. Jansen, L. Buzna\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICETA51985.2020.9379255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Firstly, this work briefly introduces the Collaborative Doctoral Program (CDP), which fosters collaborations between the Joint Research Centre and Universities, in order to provide a European qualification framework to doctoral students, who are trained to be at the intersect of science and policy through multinational projects. Secondly, this work provides an example of research conducted in the context of the CDP in the field of energy modeling aiming at developing improved modeling tools to assess the efficiency of nodal against zonal pricing and providing evidence for policy-makers. The electricity system is evolving with increasing incorporation of renewable energies, therefore also the transmission system is facing expanding challenges. As a consequence, also electricity markets are evolving. A topic of increasing interest is nodal pricing as an alternative to zonal pricing-based electricity markets in Europe. This work is giving an overview of different formulations of optimization problems in power systems and in particular, in electricity markets, which are commonly applied in literature. We focus on two different aspects being the type of optimization problem and the representation of the transmission network. In this context, the trade-off between modeling accuracy and computational efforts is the topic assessed in this study. We find that computational times increase drastically when employing unit-commitment, but remain rather moderate when sticking to economic dispatch using DC- as well as AC-OPF. The representation of networks in terms of aggregated node systems, which are relevant when aiming to compare zonal to nodal pricing-based electricity markets, show that power flows within zones are difficult to predict and it is vital to further investigate the aggregation of nodes into zones to support comparative studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 18th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 18th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA51985.2020.9379255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 18th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA51985.2020.9379255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

首先,本文简要介绍了合作博士项目(CDP),该项目促进了联合研究中心和大学之间的合作,以便为博士生提供欧洲资格框架,这些博士生通过跨国项目被培训为科学和政策的交叉点。其次,这项工作提供了一个在能源建模领域的CDP背景下进行的研究的例子,旨在开发改进的建模工具来评估节点与区域定价的效率,并为政策制定者提供证据。随着可再生能源的不断加入,电力系统也在不断发展,因此输电系统也面临着越来越大的挑战。因此,电力市场也在不断发展。在欧洲,以区域定价为基础的电力市场的替代方案是节点定价,这一话题日益引起人们的兴趣。这项工作概述了电力系统中优化问题的不同公式,特别是在电力市场中,这些公式通常在文献中应用。我们着重于两个不同的方面,即优化问题的类型和传输网络的表示。在这种情况下,建模精度和计算工作量之间的权衡是本研究评估的主题。我们发现,当采用机组承诺时,计算时间急剧增加,但当坚持使用DC-和AC-OPF的经济调度时,计算时间仍然相当温和。以聚集节点系统为基础的网络表示,当旨在比较区域与基于节点定价的电力市场时,这是相关的,表明区域内的电力流动难以预测,进一步调查节点聚集到区域以支持比较研究至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Modeling Differences of Nodal vs. Zonal Pricing Based Electricity Markets: Optimization Models and Network Representation
Firstly, this work briefly introduces the Collaborative Doctoral Program (CDP), which fosters collaborations between the Joint Research Centre and Universities, in order to provide a European qualification framework to doctoral students, who are trained to be at the intersect of science and policy through multinational projects. Secondly, this work provides an example of research conducted in the context of the CDP in the field of energy modeling aiming at developing improved modeling tools to assess the efficiency of nodal against zonal pricing and providing evidence for policy-makers. The electricity system is evolving with increasing incorporation of renewable energies, therefore also the transmission system is facing expanding challenges. As a consequence, also electricity markets are evolving. A topic of increasing interest is nodal pricing as an alternative to zonal pricing-based electricity markets in Europe. This work is giving an overview of different formulations of optimization problems in power systems and in particular, in electricity markets, which are commonly applied in literature. We focus on two different aspects being the type of optimization problem and the representation of the transmission network. In this context, the trade-off between modeling accuracy and computational efforts is the topic assessed in this study. We find that computational times increase drastically when employing unit-commitment, but remain rather moderate when sticking to economic dispatch using DC- as well as AC-OPF. The representation of networks in terms of aggregated node systems, which are relevant when aiming to compare zonal to nodal pricing-based electricity markets, show that power flows within zones are difficult to predict and it is vital to further investigate the aggregation of nodes into zones to support comparative studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Data Science and its position in university education within National Project IT Academy-Education for 21st Century Massification of Online Education: A Holistic Strategy Speech Emotion Recognition Overview and Experimental Results HIP-Based Security in IoT Networks: A comparison On-Chip Digital Calibration for Analog ICs Towards Improved Reliability in Nanotechnologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1