两种工作负荷水平下手臂运动疲劳个体差异的特异性

R. B. Alderman
{"title":"两种工作负荷水平下手臂运动疲劳个体差异的特异性","authors":"R. B. Alderman","doi":"10.1080/10671188.1965.10614687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Fifty subjects were given fatiguing tests at two work loads on a horizontal arm-crank friction ergometer.2 The initial speed was 120 rpm; the test continued for 10 min. Both fatigue curves were S-shaped—the rate of work dropped off slowly at first, then went through a rapid drop-off phase followed by a slow drop-off phase that approached an asymptotic steady state. The mathematical form was a two-component exponential equation which fitted the observed data very closely. Using a 2-k. work load, there was 22 percent decrement at the end of the test. Using a 3.45-k. work load (1 week later), the decrement was 48 percent. Test-retest reliability of individual differences in drop-off was moderately high (r = .86 and .85 for the two work loads). However, the correlation between drop-offs for the two work loads was only r = .61 and even after correction for attenuation was only .71. Thus only 50 percent of the individual difference variance in fatigability was common to the two work loads, while 50 per...","PeriodicalId":192960,"journal":{"name":"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1965-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Specificity of Individual Differences in Arm Movement Fatigue within Two Levels of Work Load\",\"authors\":\"R. B. Alderman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10671188.1965.10614687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Fifty subjects were given fatiguing tests at two work loads on a horizontal arm-crank friction ergometer.2 The initial speed was 120 rpm; the test continued for 10 min. Both fatigue curves were S-shaped—the rate of work dropped off slowly at first, then went through a rapid drop-off phase followed by a slow drop-off phase that approached an asymptotic steady state. The mathematical form was a two-component exponential equation which fitted the observed data very closely. Using a 2-k. work load, there was 22 percent decrement at the end of the test. Using a 3.45-k. work load (1 week later), the decrement was 48 percent. Test-retest reliability of individual differences in drop-off was moderately high (r = .86 and .85 for the two work loads). However, the correlation between drop-offs for the two work loads was only r = .61 and even after correction for attenuation was only .71. Thus only 50 percent of the individual difference variance in fatigability was common to the two work loads, while 50 per...\",\"PeriodicalId\":192960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1965-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1965.10614687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1965.10614687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要对50名被试在水平臂曲柄摩擦测功仪上进行两种工作负荷下的疲劳试验初始转速为120转/分;试验持续10 min。两种疲劳曲线均呈s形,即功速率先缓慢下降,然后经历快速下降阶段,然后缓慢下降阶段,接近渐近稳定状态。数学形式为双组分指数方程,与观测数据非常吻合。使用2k。工作负荷,在测试结束时减少了22%。使用3.45 k。工作负荷(1周后),减少48%。两种工作负荷的个体差异重测信度分别为0.86和0.85。然而,两种工作负荷之间的相关性仅为r = 0.61,甚至在衰减校正后也仅为0.71。因此,在两种工作负荷中,只有50%的疲劳性个体差异是共同的,而50%的疲劳性个体差异是共同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Specificity of Individual Differences in Arm Movement Fatigue within Two Levels of Work Load
Abstract Fifty subjects were given fatiguing tests at two work loads on a horizontal arm-crank friction ergometer.2 The initial speed was 120 rpm; the test continued for 10 min. Both fatigue curves were S-shaped—the rate of work dropped off slowly at first, then went through a rapid drop-off phase followed by a slow drop-off phase that approached an asymptotic steady state. The mathematical form was a two-component exponential equation which fitted the observed data very closely. Using a 2-k. work load, there was 22 percent decrement at the end of the test. Using a 3.45-k. work load (1 week later), the decrement was 48 percent. Test-retest reliability of individual differences in drop-off was moderately high (r = .86 and .85 for the two work loads). However, the correlation between drop-offs for the two work loads was only r = .61 and even after correction for attenuation was only .71. Thus only 50 percent of the individual difference variance in fatigability was common to the two work loads, while 50 per...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exercise-Induced Activation and Human Performance: A Review A Somatotype Dispersion Index Prediction of Endurance Performance and Oxygen Consumption from Cardiac Time Components An Improved Stabilometer Task Apparatus Family Influence and Involvement in Sports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1