公共政策在促进传统小型企业创新方面的作用

IF 1.8 Q3 MANAGEMENT REGE-Revista de Gestao Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rege.2016.10.001
Ricardo Augusto Bonotto Barboza , Sergio Azevedo Fonseca , Geralda Cristina de Freitas Ramalheiro
{"title":"公共政策在促进传统小型企业创新方面的作用","authors":"Ricardo Augusto Bonotto Barboza ,&nbsp;Sergio Azevedo Fonseca ,&nbsp;Geralda Cristina de Freitas Ramalheiro","doi":"10.1016/j.rege.2016.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The need for organizations to innovate has always been a major factor for business competitiveness. From the beginning of the 2000‘s this need has turned even more important, especially with the advent and widespread of innovations, intensifying competition and shortening the life cycle of products. It is perceived, however, that companies operating in more traditional sectors of the economy have higher barriers to innovative procedures, barriers increased and enhanced when it comes to the universe of micro and small enterprises (MSEs). These difficulties, by itself, support the need for policies and public interventions in order to minimize the barriers. In this context, this paper addresses a research which studied two innovation supporting programs in Brazil: the business incubation, with particular focus in the Business Incubator of the city of Araraquara; and the Brazilian Service for Technical Answers (SBRT) in this particular case represented by one of his agents, the Integrated Service of Technical Answers (SIRT) of the Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP/Araraquara). This study reports the virtues, the limitations and difficulties of these two instruments of public policy as potential or actual inducers to innovations in non‐technological micro and small enterprises (MSEs). The research analyzed the types, sources and mechanisms used to promote innovations in the MSEs. The methodology comprised a qualitative research, exploratory, designed as a simple case study, with data collected through interviews and participant observation. It was found that the MSEs, even those who participate in public programs and policies, have many difficulties to operationalize innovation. It was noted also that the joining of the two instruments leveraged innovative activities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43596,"journal":{"name":"REGE-Revista de Gestao","volume":"24 1","pages":"Pages 58-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rege.2016.10.001","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O papel das políticas públicas para potencializar a inovação em pequenas empresas de base tradicional\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Augusto Bonotto Barboza ,&nbsp;Sergio Azevedo Fonseca ,&nbsp;Geralda Cristina de Freitas Ramalheiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rege.2016.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The need for organizations to innovate has always been a major factor for business competitiveness. From the beginning of the 2000‘s this need has turned even more important, especially with the advent and widespread of innovations, intensifying competition and shortening the life cycle of products. It is perceived, however, that companies operating in more traditional sectors of the economy have higher barriers to innovative procedures, barriers increased and enhanced when it comes to the universe of micro and small enterprises (MSEs). These difficulties, by itself, support the need for policies and public interventions in order to minimize the barriers. In this context, this paper addresses a research which studied two innovation supporting programs in Brazil: the business incubation, with particular focus in the Business Incubator of the city of Araraquara; and the Brazilian Service for Technical Answers (SBRT) in this particular case represented by one of his agents, the Integrated Service of Technical Answers (SIRT) of the Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP/Araraquara). This study reports the virtues, the limitations and difficulties of these two instruments of public policy as potential or actual inducers to innovations in non‐technological micro and small enterprises (MSEs). The research analyzed the types, sources and mechanisms used to promote innovations in the MSEs. The methodology comprised a qualitative research, exploratory, designed as a simple case study, with data collected through interviews and participant observation. It was found that the MSEs, even those who participate in public programs and policies, have many difficulties to operationalize innovation. It was noted also that the joining of the two instruments leveraged innovative activities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REGE-Revista de Gestao\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 58-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rege.2016.10.001\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REGE-Revista de Gestao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1809227616306427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REGE-Revista de Gestao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1809227616306427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

组织对创新的需求一直是企业竞争力的一个主要因素。从21世纪初开始,这种需求变得更加重要,特别是随着创新的出现和广泛传播,竞争加剧和产品生命周期的缩短。然而,人们认为,在较传统的经济部门经营的公司在创新程序方面有较高的障碍,在微型和小型企业领域,这种障碍增加并加强了。这些困难本身就支持需要制定政策和公共干预措施,以尽量减少障碍。在此背景下,本文阐述了一项研究,该研究研究了巴西的两个创新支持计划:商业孵化,特别关注阿拉拉奎拉市的商业孵化器;和巴西技术解答服务处(SBRT),在这个特殊的案例中,由他的代理之一,圣保罗大学(UNESP/Araraquara)的综合技术解答服务处(SIRT)代表。本研究报告了这两种公共政策工具作为非技术微型和小型企业(mse)创新的潜在或实际诱因的优点、局限性和困难。研究分析了中小微企业创新的类型、来源和机制。方法包括定性研究,探索性,设计为一个简单的案例研究,通过访谈和参与者观察收集数据。研究发现,即使是参与公共项目和政策的中小企业,在实施创新方面也存在许多困难。会议还指出,这两项文书的合并促进了创新活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O papel das políticas públicas para potencializar a inovação em pequenas empresas de base tradicional

The need for organizations to innovate has always been a major factor for business competitiveness. From the beginning of the 2000‘s this need has turned even more important, especially with the advent and widespread of innovations, intensifying competition and shortening the life cycle of products. It is perceived, however, that companies operating in more traditional sectors of the economy have higher barriers to innovative procedures, barriers increased and enhanced when it comes to the universe of micro and small enterprises (MSEs). These difficulties, by itself, support the need for policies and public interventions in order to minimize the barriers. In this context, this paper addresses a research which studied two innovation supporting programs in Brazil: the business incubation, with particular focus in the Business Incubator of the city of Araraquara; and the Brazilian Service for Technical Answers (SBRT) in this particular case represented by one of his agents, the Integrated Service of Technical Answers (SIRT) of the Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP/Araraquara). This study reports the virtues, the limitations and difficulties of these two instruments of public policy as potential or actual inducers to innovations in non‐technological micro and small enterprises (MSEs). The research analyzed the types, sources and mechanisms used to promote innovations in the MSEs. The methodology comprised a qualitative research, exploratory, designed as a simple case study, with data collected through interviews and participant observation. It was found that the MSEs, even those who participate in public programs and policies, have many difficulties to operationalize innovation. It was noted also that the joining of the two instruments leveraged innovative activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sessão especial - Fast Track SEMEAD: Tem ação nessa pesquisa? Um levantamento da pesquisa‐ação como estratégia de pesquisa qualitativa Sessão especial - Fast Track SEMEAD: Comportamento de cidadania organizacional: sua interação com os valores organizacionais e a satisfação no trabalho Propriedades psicométricas das medidas do Questionário Psicossocial de Copenhague I (COPSOQ I), versão curta Participação social nos serviços públicos: caracterização do estado da arte por meio da bibliometria e da revisão sistemática Sessão especial - Fast Track SEMEAD: Potencialidades e desafios na articulação entre a memória e a aprendizagem organizacional: o Centro de Memória Bunge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1