{"title":"人物身份和政治动机构成背后的奥古因trí马克迪亚玛塔梅奇塞拜尔","authors":"C. Ostrander","doi":"10.1353/cel.2021.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The ninth-century Irish tale Orgguin trí mac Diarmata meic Cerbaill is something of an outlier, both in terms of the Leinster Cycle, in which it is explicitly included by Rawlinson B 502, and, especially, in terms of the corpus of the tale's featured Uí Néill king, Diarmait mac Cerbaill. So at odds is this tale with elements of the identity established for Diarmait by the rest of his corpus that it appears that he is being used in the text anachronistically and as a proxy. Indeed, certain details in the tale, particularly the names of the titular three sons and the place of the tale's climax, Lagore Crannóg, indicate that the Uí Néill king in the tale would have been better identified as Áed Sláine. However, while Áed is the best match, this reading, too, presents challenges, and it is clear that Orgguin trí mac was not written to describe true events of the sixth or seventh century, but rather to use representatives from the past to comment upon the historical reality contemporary with the tale's composition. Examination of the characters, peoples, and place-names within the tale, as compared to relevant historical figures and events as described in the annals, reveal close ties between the details of the tale and the reality of the ninth century. Specifically, these details combine to provide compelling evidence that Orgguin trí mac Diarmata meic Cerbaill was written ca. 867–868 to explain and justify an alliance between the Laigin and Síl nÁedo Sláine.","PeriodicalId":160851,"journal":{"name":"North American journal of Celtic studies","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Character identity and the political motivation behind the composition of Orgguin trí mac Diarmata meic Cerbaill\",\"authors\":\"C. Ostrander\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cel.2021.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:The ninth-century Irish tale Orgguin trí mac Diarmata meic Cerbaill is something of an outlier, both in terms of the Leinster Cycle, in which it is explicitly included by Rawlinson B 502, and, especially, in terms of the corpus of the tale's featured Uí Néill king, Diarmait mac Cerbaill. So at odds is this tale with elements of the identity established for Diarmait by the rest of his corpus that it appears that he is being used in the text anachronistically and as a proxy. Indeed, certain details in the tale, particularly the names of the titular three sons and the place of the tale's climax, Lagore Crannóg, indicate that the Uí Néill king in the tale would have been better identified as Áed Sláine. However, while Áed is the best match, this reading, too, presents challenges, and it is clear that Orgguin trí mac was not written to describe true events of the sixth or seventh century, but rather to use representatives from the past to comment upon the historical reality contemporary with the tale's composition. Examination of the characters, peoples, and place-names within the tale, as compared to relevant historical figures and events as described in the annals, reveal close ties between the details of the tale and the reality of the ninth century. Specifically, these details combine to provide compelling evidence that Orgguin trí mac Diarmata meic Cerbaill was written ca. 867–868 to explain and justify an alliance between the Laigin and Síl nÁedo Sláine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":160851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American journal of Celtic studies\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American journal of Celtic studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cel.2021.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American journal of Celtic studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cel.2021.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
9世纪的爱尔兰故事《奥古因trí》(mac Diarmata meic Cerbaill)是一个异类,无论是在《伦斯特循环》(The leinstter Cycle)中,罗林森(Rawlinson)在《伦斯特循环》中明确地把它包括在内,还是在故事的主体Uí《纳姆西米尔国王》(Diarmait mac Cerbaill)方面,都是如此。因此,这个故事与他的其他语料库中为Diarmait建立的身份元素是不一致的,他似乎在文本中被错误地使用,作为一个代理。的确,故事中的某些细节,特别是名义上的三个儿子的名字和故事的高潮地点拉各尔Crannóg,表明故事中的Uí纳萨伊尔国王更应该被确定为Áed Sláine。然而,虽然Áed是最好的匹配,但这种阅读方式也提出了挑战,很明显,奥根trí mac并不是为了描述六世纪或七世纪的真实事件而写的,而是用过去的代表来评论与故事构成同时代的历史现实。将故事中的人物、人物和地名与编年史中描述的相关历史人物和事件进行比较,可以发现故事的细节与九世纪的现实之间存在着密切的联系。具体来说,这些细节结合起来提供了令人信服的证据,证明Orgguin trí mac Diarmata meic Cerbaill写于大约867-868年,用来解释和证明拉丁人与Síl nÁedo Sláine之间的联盟。
Character identity and the political motivation behind the composition of Orgguin trí mac Diarmata meic Cerbaill
abstract:The ninth-century Irish tale Orgguin trí mac Diarmata meic Cerbaill is something of an outlier, both in terms of the Leinster Cycle, in which it is explicitly included by Rawlinson B 502, and, especially, in terms of the corpus of the tale's featured Uí Néill king, Diarmait mac Cerbaill. So at odds is this tale with elements of the identity established for Diarmait by the rest of his corpus that it appears that he is being used in the text anachronistically and as a proxy. Indeed, certain details in the tale, particularly the names of the titular three sons and the place of the tale's climax, Lagore Crannóg, indicate that the Uí Néill king in the tale would have been better identified as Áed Sláine. However, while Áed is the best match, this reading, too, presents challenges, and it is clear that Orgguin trí mac was not written to describe true events of the sixth or seventh century, but rather to use representatives from the past to comment upon the historical reality contemporary with the tale's composition. Examination of the characters, peoples, and place-names within the tale, as compared to relevant historical figures and events as described in the annals, reveal close ties between the details of the tale and the reality of the ninth century. Specifically, these details combine to provide compelling evidence that Orgguin trí mac Diarmata meic Cerbaill was written ca. 867–868 to explain and justify an alliance between the Laigin and Síl nÁedo Sláine.