学生在国际期刊研究论文写作结果与讨论部分的问题

Dian Eka Candra Wardhana, N. Yanti, Susetyo Susetyo, S. Suhartono
{"title":"学生在国际期刊研究论文写作结果与讨论部分的问题","authors":"Dian Eka Candra Wardhana, N. Yanti, Susetyo Susetyo, S. Suhartono","doi":"10.2991/ICETEP-18.2019.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In writing a research article student are expected to be able to write a good result and discussion in fact, they tend to use descriptive style which cannot categorize as a good result and discussion. Therefore, this research is aimed at describing students learning model in writing result and discussion. The method is qualitative method. The data were collected from classroom observation, recording, and interview when they were writing a research article based on research. The analysis of the data followed some steps namely; (1) collecting scores from expert assessment by inter-subjectivity test of 5 experts, (2) collecting pragmatic test result, (3) calculating the result of reliability and validity test, (4) designing the process indicator of learning based research (5) Synthesizing the data with the research indicator .The results of the study illustrate that there is a problem of scientific competence and mechanical mastery in writing result and discussion part. The problem of scientific competence includes; (1) stating unexpected result of the research (2) refer to previous research, (3) using various illustrations, (4) interpreting research results for scientific purposes, and (5) suggest for practical implementation of research findings. In conclusion, there are a number of scientific competence problems and mechanical competence problems are found. It is suggested that the learning process of writing result and discussion part which is oriented to publish the article in international Journal should be done continuously to the students and lecturers (in Supervising the students) in order to create adequate academic","PeriodicalId":220496,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018)","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student’s Problem in Writing Results and Discussion Section of Research Articles for International Journals\",\"authors\":\"Dian Eka Candra Wardhana, N. Yanti, Susetyo Susetyo, S. Suhartono\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/ICETEP-18.2019.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In writing a research article student are expected to be able to write a good result and discussion in fact, they tend to use descriptive style which cannot categorize as a good result and discussion. Therefore, this research is aimed at describing students learning model in writing result and discussion. The method is qualitative method. The data were collected from classroom observation, recording, and interview when they were writing a research article based on research. The analysis of the data followed some steps namely; (1) collecting scores from expert assessment by inter-subjectivity test of 5 experts, (2) collecting pragmatic test result, (3) calculating the result of reliability and validity test, (4) designing the process indicator of learning based research (5) Synthesizing the data with the research indicator .The results of the study illustrate that there is a problem of scientific competence and mechanical mastery in writing result and discussion part. The problem of scientific competence includes; (1) stating unexpected result of the research (2) refer to previous research, (3) using various illustrations, (4) interpreting research results for scientific purposes, and (5) suggest for practical implementation of research findings. In conclusion, there are a number of scientific competence problems and mechanical competence problems are found. It is suggested that the learning process of writing result and discussion part which is oriented to publish the article in international Journal should be done continuously to the students and lecturers (in Supervising the students) in order to create adequate academic\",\"PeriodicalId\":220496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018)\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICETEP-18.2019.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICETEP-18.2019.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在写一篇研究文章的学生被期望能够写出一个好的结果和讨论,事实上,他们倾向于使用描述性的风格,不能归类为一个好的结果和讨论。因此,本研究旨在描述学生在写作结果和讨论中的学习模式。方法为定性方法。这些数据是他们在撰写基于研究的研究文章时通过课堂观察、记录和采访收集的。数据的分析遵循以下几个步骤:(1)通过对5位专家的主体间性测试收集专家评价得分;(2)收集语用测试结果;(3)计算信效度测试结果;(4)设计基于学习的研究过程指标;(5)将数据与研究指标进行综合。研究结果表明,在写作结果和讨论部分存在科学能力和机械掌握的问题。科学能力问题包括:(1)陈述研究的意外结果;(2)参考以往的研究;(3)使用各种例证;(4)为科学目的解释研究结果;(5)为研究结果的实际实施提出建议。综上所述,发现了一些科学能力问题和机械能力问题。建议对学生和教师(在指导学生的过程中)持续进行以在国际期刊上发表文章为目标的写作成果和讨论部分的学习过程,以创造充分的学术成果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Student’s Problem in Writing Results and Discussion Section of Research Articles for International Journals
In writing a research article student are expected to be able to write a good result and discussion in fact, they tend to use descriptive style which cannot categorize as a good result and discussion. Therefore, this research is aimed at describing students learning model in writing result and discussion. The method is qualitative method. The data were collected from classroom observation, recording, and interview when they were writing a research article based on research. The analysis of the data followed some steps namely; (1) collecting scores from expert assessment by inter-subjectivity test of 5 experts, (2) collecting pragmatic test result, (3) calculating the result of reliability and validity test, (4) designing the process indicator of learning based research (5) Synthesizing the data with the research indicator .The results of the study illustrate that there is a problem of scientific competence and mechanical mastery in writing result and discussion part. The problem of scientific competence includes; (1) stating unexpected result of the research (2) refer to previous research, (3) using various illustrations, (4) interpreting research results for scientific purposes, and (5) suggest for practical implementation of research findings. In conclusion, there are a number of scientific competence problems and mechanical competence problems are found. It is suggested that the learning process of writing result and discussion part which is oriented to publish the article in international Journal should be done continuously to the students and lecturers (in Supervising the students) in order to create adequate academic
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethnomathematics and Outdoor Learning to Improve Problem Solving Ability Abstract Thesis Analysis in Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching Fields Character Education through People's Story Increasing Self-efficacy through Inclusive Education for Autistic Children The Relationship between Motivation, Engagement and Performance of Employee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1