具有选择性外延阳极的晶闸管SRAM电池的体积优于SOI性能

T. Sugizaki, M. Nakamura, M. Yanagita, M. Shinohara, T. Ikuta, T. Ohchi, K. Kugimiya, R. Yamamoto, S. Kanda, K. Yagami, T. Oda
{"title":"具有选择性外延阳极的晶闸管SRAM电池的体积优于SOI性能","authors":"T. Sugizaki, M. Nakamura, M. Yanagita, M. Shinohara, T. Ikuta, T. Ohchi, K. Kugimiya, R. Yamamoto, S. Kanda, K. Yagami, T. Oda","doi":"10.1109/ESSDERC.2007.4430943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We fabricated alternative SRAM cells based on a thyristor using SOI and bulk Si wafers, and then compared their performance. A selective epitaxy technique was applied to form anode regions (SEA) for both types. These devices performed extremely well, with high-speed read/write, high lon/Ioff current ratio (>108), and low stand-by current (< 0.5 nA/cell). Write \"1\" (turn-on) and read performance were comparable for both bulk and SOI (< 100 ps). However, for write \"0\" (turn-off), the bulk type had much faster speed and lower voltage than the SOI type. In RAM operations, performance of the SOI type would be dominated by write \"0\" operation speed. These results suggest that the bulk type is more suitable than the SOI type for RAM devices that operate at highspeed.","PeriodicalId":103959,"journal":{"name":"ESSDERC 2007 - 37th European Solid State Device Research Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advantages of bulk over SOI in performance of thyristor-based SRAM cell with selective epitaxy anode\",\"authors\":\"T. Sugizaki, M. Nakamura, M. Yanagita, M. Shinohara, T. Ikuta, T. Ohchi, K. Kugimiya, R. Yamamoto, S. Kanda, K. Yagami, T. Oda\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESSDERC.2007.4430943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We fabricated alternative SRAM cells based on a thyristor using SOI and bulk Si wafers, and then compared their performance. A selective epitaxy technique was applied to form anode regions (SEA) for both types. These devices performed extremely well, with high-speed read/write, high lon/Ioff current ratio (>108), and low stand-by current (< 0.5 nA/cell). Write \\\"1\\\" (turn-on) and read performance were comparable for both bulk and SOI (< 100 ps). However, for write \\\"0\\\" (turn-off), the bulk type had much faster speed and lower voltage than the SOI type. In RAM operations, performance of the SOI type would be dominated by write \\\"0\\\" operation speed. These results suggest that the bulk type is more suitable than the SOI type for RAM devices that operate at highspeed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESSDERC 2007 - 37th European Solid State Device Research Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESSDERC 2007 - 37th European Solid State Device Research Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESSDERC.2007.4430943\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESSDERC 2007 - 37th European Solid State Device Research Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESSDERC.2007.4430943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们利用SOI和块状硅片制备了基于晶闸管的SRAM电池,并比较了它们的性能。采用选择性外延技术形成两种类型的阳极区(SEA)。这些器件性能非常好,具有高速读/写,高开关电流比(bbb108)和低待机电流(< 0.5 nA/cell)。写“1”(打开)和读性能对于批量和SOI (< 100 ps)都是相当的。然而,对于写“0”(关断),bulk类型具有比SOI类型更快的速度和更低的电压。在RAM操作中,SOI类型的性能将由写“0”操作速度决定。这些结果表明,对于高速运行的RAM器件,bulk类型比SOI类型更适合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advantages of bulk over SOI in performance of thyristor-based SRAM cell with selective epitaxy anode
We fabricated alternative SRAM cells based on a thyristor using SOI and bulk Si wafers, and then compared their performance. A selective epitaxy technique was applied to form anode regions (SEA) for both types. These devices performed extremely well, with high-speed read/write, high lon/Ioff current ratio (>108), and low stand-by current (< 0.5 nA/cell). Write "1" (turn-on) and read performance were comparable for both bulk and SOI (< 100 ps). However, for write "0" (turn-off), the bulk type had much faster speed and lower voltage than the SOI type. In RAM operations, performance of the SOI type would be dominated by write "0" operation speed. These results suggest that the bulk type is more suitable than the SOI type for RAM devices that operate at highspeed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
1T-capacitorless bulk memory: Scalability and signal impact Anisotropy of electron mobility in arbitrarily oriented FinFETs Self-aligned μTrench phase-change memory cell architecture for 90nm technology and beyond Critique of high-frequency performance of carbon nanotube FETs Analytical and compact modelling of the I-MOS (impact ionization MOS)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1