环境伦理、生态教育学与自然保护:视角与相互联系

Camila Magri Bertolin
{"title":"环境伦理、生态教育学与自然保护:视角与相互联系","authors":"Camila Magri Bertolin","doi":"10.11602/1984-4271.2019.12.3.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The environmental ethics criticizes the logic of utilitarian nature, which does not consider the intrinsic value of the nature. Therefore, it is necessary to attach scientific advances and other technological areas to ethic principles. The main objective of this study is to analyze concepts and theoretical perspectives, in attempt to evidence connections between environmental ethics, ecopedagogy and conservation biology. This study is characterized as a qualitative research. The method adopted is a literature review and a conceptual ordering according to authors and actions. In addition, the hypothetical-deductive method was used, and the content analysis. It was observed that predatory mentality originates ecological ethic discussions, and that environmental ethic is the origin of the need to conserve nature, the only coherent position about preserving the environment. This study pointed that ethic discussions will never stop being anthropological, but need to stop being anthropocentric. As soon, the ecological ethic should be biocentric, in which central objective is life and the value of the nature for itself. This perspective of human being isolation from rest of the world must be substituted by a holistic point of view. Therefore, the ecopedagogy is a system that can make possible sustainable transformations in society, breaking through anthropocentric perspectives, developing the planetary citizenship. It demonstrates correlation between ecopedagogy, conservation and sustainability. It concludes that there is necessity to develop education projects related to this specific perspective. There is also the need to create ethic legal systems witch interconnect the presented concepts.","PeriodicalId":364577,"journal":{"name":"Revista Ciência e Desenvolvimento","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ÉTICA AMBIENTAL, ECOPEDAGOGIA E CONSERVAÇÃO DA NATUREZA: PERSPECTIVAS E INTERCONEXÕES\",\"authors\":\"Camila Magri Bertolin\",\"doi\":\"10.11602/1984-4271.2019.12.3.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The environmental ethics criticizes the logic of utilitarian nature, which does not consider the intrinsic value of the nature. Therefore, it is necessary to attach scientific advances and other technological areas to ethic principles. The main objective of this study is to analyze concepts and theoretical perspectives, in attempt to evidence connections between environmental ethics, ecopedagogy and conservation biology. This study is characterized as a qualitative research. The method adopted is a literature review and a conceptual ordering according to authors and actions. In addition, the hypothetical-deductive method was used, and the content analysis. It was observed that predatory mentality originates ecological ethic discussions, and that environmental ethic is the origin of the need to conserve nature, the only coherent position about preserving the environment. This study pointed that ethic discussions will never stop being anthropological, but need to stop being anthropocentric. As soon, the ecological ethic should be biocentric, in which central objective is life and the value of the nature for itself. This perspective of human being isolation from rest of the world must be substituted by a holistic point of view. Therefore, the ecopedagogy is a system that can make possible sustainable transformations in society, breaking through anthropocentric perspectives, developing the planetary citizenship. It demonstrates correlation between ecopedagogy, conservation and sustainability. It concludes that there is necessity to develop education projects related to this specific perspective. There is also the need to create ethic legal systems witch interconnect the presented concepts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":364577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Ciência e Desenvolvimento\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Ciência e Desenvolvimento\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11602/1984-4271.2019.12.3.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Ciência e Desenvolvimento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11602/1984-4271.2019.12.3.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境伦理学批判的是功利主义的自然逻辑,它没有考虑到自然的内在价值。因此,有必要将科学进步和其他技术领域与伦理原则联系起来。本研究的主要目的是分析概念和理论视角,试图证明环境伦理学、生态生态学和保护生物学之间的联系。本研究的特点是定性研究。所采用的方法是文献综述和根据作者和行为进行概念排序。此外,采用假设-演绎方法,并对内容进行了分析。有人指出,掠夺心态源于生态伦理讨论,环境伦理是保护自然的需要的根源,这是保护环境的唯一一致立场。这项研究指出,伦理讨论永远不会停止人类学,但需要停止人类中心主义。生态伦理应当以生命为中心,以生命和自然价值为中心。这种认为人类与世界其他地方隔绝的观点必须被一种整体观点所取代。因此,生态学是一个系统,它可以使社会的可持续转变成为可能,突破人类中心主义的观点,发展地球公民。它证明了生态学、保护和可持续性之间的相关性。结论是有必要开发与这一特定视角相关的教育项目。还需要建立伦理法律体系,使所提出的概念相互联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ÉTICA AMBIENTAL, ECOPEDAGOGIA E CONSERVAÇÃO DA NATUREZA: PERSPECTIVAS E INTERCONEXÕES
The environmental ethics criticizes the logic of utilitarian nature, which does not consider the intrinsic value of the nature. Therefore, it is necessary to attach scientific advances and other technological areas to ethic principles. The main objective of this study is to analyze concepts and theoretical perspectives, in attempt to evidence connections between environmental ethics, ecopedagogy and conservation biology. This study is characterized as a qualitative research. The method adopted is a literature review and a conceptual ordering according to authors and actions. In addition, the hypothetical-deductive method was used, and the content analysis. It was observed that predatory mentality originates ecological ethic discussions, and that environmental ethic is the origin of the need to conserve nature, the only coherent position about preserving the environment. This study pointed that ethic discussions will never stop being anthropological, but need to stop being anthropocentric. As soon, the ecological ethic should be biocentric, in which central objective is life and the value of the nature for itself. This perspective of human being isolation from rest of the world must be substituted by a holistic point of view. Therefore, the ecopedagogy is a system that can make possible sustainable transformations in society, breaking through anthropocentric perspectives, developing the planetary citizenship. It demonstrates correlation between ecopedagogy, conservation and sustainability. It concludes that there is necessity to develop education projects related to this specific perspective. There is also the need to create ethic legal systems witch interconnect the presented concepts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PERFIL EPIDEMIOLÓGICO DE PACIENTES DIAGNOSTICADOS COM LEISHMANIOSE VISCERAL HUMANA NO BRASIL GREGÓRIO DE MATOS 29: UMA ANÁLISE DO ESTADO DE CONSERVAÇÃO FATORES ASSOCIADOS AO DESMAME PRECOCE: O QUE AS EVIDÊNCIAS CIENTÍFICAS MOSTRAM? A PERCEPÇÃO DE ESTUDANTES DO EJA DO ENSINO MÉDIO SOBRE A IMPORTÂNCIA DA QUÍMICA NO SUL DO AMAZONAS QUALIDADE DE VIDA DE IDOSOS: PROPOSIÇÃO DE INTERVENÇÕES MULTIDIMENSIONAIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1