字体大小对打字性能和坐姿的影响

H. Lohasiriwat, Temsin Wattanapanich, Panmeq Saechan
{"title":"字体大小对打字性能和坐姿的影响","authors":"H. Lohasiriwat, Temsin Wattanapanich, Panmeq Saechan","doi":"10.1109/IEEM.2014.7058683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Working with computer usually required prolonged static sitting. Both static work and awkward posture are well known as the two major ergonomic risk factors in such activity. Workstation arrangement guidelines are usually suggested based on good working posture. In this study, rather than investigating on the physical dimensions of the workstation (i.e., table and chair) like others, we look into the font size factor instead. Our research is separated into two phases. The first phase is to study the effect of font size (8 moa, 12 moa, 16 moa, and 24 moa) and viewing distance on working performance as measured by text-entering speed. Our results show that both factors are not significant (p-value = 0.464 and 0.913 respectively). Then, in the second phase, we look at whether there are tendency of sitting posture change due to the different font size. Our findings show significant difference on neck angle (p-value = 0.007) but not back angle (p-value = 0.314). Our finding suggests that there are more posture deviations under smaller font size conditions.","PeriodicalId":318405,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of font size on typing performance and sitting posture\",\"authors\":\"H. Lohasiriwat, Temsin Wattanapanich, Panmeq Saechan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEEM.2014.7058683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Working with computer usually required prolonged static sitting. Both static work and awkward posture are well known as the two major ergonomic risk factors in such activity. Workstation arrangement guidelines are usually suggested based on good working posture. In this study, rather than investigating on the physical dimensions of the workstation (i.e., table and chair) like others, we look into the font size factor instead. Our research is separated into two phases. The first phase is to study the effect of font size (8 moa, 12 moa, 16 moa, and 24 moa) and viewing distance on working performance as measured by text-entering speed. Our results show that both factors are not significant (p-value = 0.464 and 0.913 respectively). Then, in the second phase, we look at whether there are tendency of sitting posture change due to the different font size. Our findings show significant difference on neck angle (p-value = 0.007) but not back angle (p-value = 0.314). Our finding suggests that there are more posture deviations under smaller font size conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2014.7058683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2014.7058683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

使用电脑工作通常需要长时间静坐。众所周知,静态工作和笨拙的姿势是这类活动中两个主要的人体工程学风险因素。工作站布置指南通常以良好的工作姿势为基础。在这项研究中,我们不像其他人那样调查工作站的物理尺寸(即桌子和椅子),而是研究字体大小因素。我们的研究分为两个阶段。第一阶段是研究字体大小(8 moa、12 moa、16 moa和24 moa)和观看距离对工作性能的影响,通过文本输入速度来衡量。我们的结果显示,这两个因素不显著(p值分别为0.464和0.913)。然后,在第二阶段,我们看是否有坐姿变化的趋势,因为不同的字体大小。我们的研究结果显示颈角差异显著(p值= 0.007),但背角差异不显著(p值= 0.314)。我们的发现表明,在字体较小的情况下,有更多的姿势偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of font size on typing performance and sitting posture
Working with computer usually required prolonged static sitting. Both static work and awkward posture are well known as the two major ergonomic risk factors in such activity. Workstation arrangement guidelines are usually suggested based on good working posture. In this study, rather than investigating on the physical dimensions of the workstation (i.e., table and chair) like others, we look into the font size factor instead. Our research is separated into two phases. The first phase is to study the effect of font size (8 moa, 12 moa, 16 moa, and 24 moa) and viewing distance on working performance as measured by text-entering speed. Our results show that both factors are not significant (p-value = 0.464 and 0.913 respectively). Then, in the second phase, we look at whether there are tendency of sitting posture change due to the different font size. Our findings show significant difference on neck angle (p-value = 0.007) but not back angle (p-value = 0.314). Our finding suggests that there are more posture deviations under smaller font size conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Supplier selection activities in the service sector: A case study in Nigeria Modelling financial flow of the supply chain Adoption of near field communication for mobile payment: Evidence from Macau The optimal ordering quantity with uncertain food's safety environment Standardization programs in the industrial plant business: Best practices and lessons learned
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1