虚拟现实飞行模拟的真实之处?:比较虚拟现实与传统飞行模拟环境的保真度

Matthias Oberhauser, Daniel Dreyer, R. Braunstingl, I. Koglbauer
{"title":"虚拟现实飞行模拟的真实之处?:比较虚拟现实与传统飞行模拟环境的保真度","authors":"Matthias Oberhauser, Daniel Dreyer, R. Braunstingl, I. Koglbauer","doi":"10.1027/2192-0923/a000134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the help of immersive virtual reality technology, novel cockpit systems can be evaluated with pilots in an early design phase. This comparative study investigates the functional fidelity of a virtual reality flight simulator (VRFS) in comparison with a conventional flight simulator. Pilots’ movement time to reach cockpit controls, deviation from the ideal flight path, workload, and simulator sickness are evaluated using an operational scenario. The results show statistically significant differences in heading, altitude, and flight path, as well as delays in operating the controls in virtual reality. Yet, most participants could safely and reliably complete the flight task. For use cases in which adaptations to pace, exposure time, and flight task are acceptable, which is often the case in early phases of the design process, VRFSs can be viable tools for human factors engineering.","PeriodicalId":121896,"journal":{"name":"Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What’s Real About Virtual Reality Flight Simulation?: Comparing the Fidelity of a Virtual Reality With a Conventional Flight Simulation Environment\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Oberhauser, Daniel Dreyer, R. Braunstingl, I. Koglbauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/2192-0923/a000134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the help of immersive virtual reality technology, novel cockpit systems can be evaluated with pilots in an early design phase. This comparative study investigates the functional fidelity of a virtual reality flight simulator (VRFS) in comparison with a conventional flight simulator. Pilots’ movement time to reach cockpit controls, deviation from the ideal flight path, workload, and simulator sickness are evaluated using an operational scenario. The results show statistically significant differences in heading, altitude, and flight path, as well as delays in operating the controls in virtual reality. Yet, most participants could safely and reliably complete the flight task. For use cases in which adaptations to pace, exposure time, and flight task are acceptable, which is often the case in early phases of the design process, VRFSs can be viable tools for human factors engineering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/2192-0923/a000134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/2192-0923/a000134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

在沉浸式虚拟现实技术的帮助下,新的座舱系统可以在早期设计阶段与飞行员一起进行评估。本比较研究探讨了虚拟现实飞行模拟器(VRFS)与传统飞行模拟器的功能保真度。飞行员到达座舱控制的运动时间、偏离理想飞行路径、工作量和模拟器晕机使用操作场景进行评估。结果显示,在航向、高度和飞行路径上存在统计学上的显著差异,以及在虚拟现实中操作控制的延迟。然而,大多数参与者可以安全可靠地完成飞行任务。对于速度、曝光时间和飞行任务的调整是可以接受的用例,这通常是在设计过程的早期阶段,vrfs可以成为人为因素工程的可行工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What’s Real About Virtual Reality Flight Simulation?: Comparing the Fidelity of a Virtual Reality With a Conventional Flight Simulation Environment
With the help of immersive virtual reality technology, novel cockpit systems can be evaluated with pilots in an early design phase. This comparative study investigates the functional fidelity of a virtual reality flight simulator (VRFS) in comparison with a conventional flight simulator. Pilots’ movement time to reach cockpit controls, deviation from the ideal flight path, workload, and simulator sickness are evaluated using an operational scenario. The results show statistically significant differences in heading, altitude, and flight path, as well as delays in operating the controls in virtual reality. Yet, most participants could safely and reliably complete the flight task. For use cases in which adaptations to pace, exposure time, and flight task are acceptable, which is often the case in early phases of the design process, VRFSs can be viable tools for human factors engineering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interactions With Technology in the Cockpit Measuring Presence and Situational Awareness in a Virtual Reality Flight Simulator The Effectiveness of Improving Flight Passengers’ Safety Behaviors by Modifying Auditory Cues Eye-Tracking Crucial Abilities of Pilots and Weapon Systems Officers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1