迫害妄想中的自我和他人概念

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinica Y Salud Pub Date : 2014-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clysa.2014.10.005
Regina Espinosa , Carmen Valiente , Richard P. Bentall
{"title":"迫害妄想中的自我和他人概念","authors":"Regina Espinosa ,&nbsp;Carmen Valiente ,&nbsp;Richard P. Bentall","doi":"10.1016/j.clysa.2014.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Some psychological theories about persecutory delusions emphasize the importance of the concepts of self and others (Bentall, Corcoran, Howard, Blackwood, &amp; Kinderman, 2001). However, results are inconsistent, in part due to an almost exclusive usage of explicit measures focusing on self-esteem. <span>Freeman (2007)</span> has proposed that evaluative beliefs about self and others are a more stable indicator and a better predictor than self-esteem. Then, this study explored the differences in the explicit and implicit conception of self and others between patients with paranoia (<em>n</em> = 79), depression (<em>n</em> = 38), and a healthy control group (<em>n</em> = 52). The results showed that at the <em>explicit</em> level clinical groups had more negative evaluative beliefs about the self than controls, but there were no differences in evaluative beliefs about others between groups. Only the depression group showed a significantly more negative self than others. At <em>implicit</em> level, although patients had a more negative self than controls, these differences were not significant. There were no differences between groups in implicit indexes of others either. However, the control group presented an implicit pattern opposite to the explicit one, in which the index of others was significantly more negative than the index self. This study highlights the importance of exploring self together with the concept of others at different dimensions of processing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45730,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Y Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clysa.2014.10.005","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El concepto de self y de otros en los delirios persecutorios\",\"authors\":\"Regina Espinosa ,&nbsp;Carmen Valiente ,&nbsp;Richard P. Bentall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clysa.2014.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Some psychological theories about persecutory delusions emphasize the importance of the concepts of self and others (Bentall, Corcoran, Howard, Blackwood, &amp; Kinderman, 2001). However, results are inconsistent, in part due to an almost exclusive usage of explicit measures focusing on self-esteem. <span>Freeman (2007)</span> has proposed that evaluative beliefs about self and others are a more stable indicator and a better predictor than self-esteem. Then, this study explored the differences in the explicit and implicit conception of self and others between patients with paranoia (<em>n</em> = 79), depression (<em>n</em> = 38), and a healthy control group (<em>n</em> = 52). The results showed that at the <em>explicit</em> level clinical groups had more negative evaluative beliefs about the self than controls, but there were no differences in evaluative beliefs about others between groups. Only the depression group showed a significantly more negative self than others. At <em>implicit</em> level, although patients had a more negative self than controls, these differences were not significant. There were no differences between groups in implicit indexes of others either. However, the control group presented an implicit pattern opposite to the explicit one, in which the index of others was significantly more negative than the index self. This study highlights the importance of exploring self together with the concept of others at different dimensions of processing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinica Y Salud\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clysa.2014.10.005\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinica Y Salud\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S113052741400022X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Y Salud","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S113052741400022X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

一些关于受迫害妄想的心理学理论强调自我和他人概念的重要性(Bentall, Corcoran, Howard, Blackwood, &Kinderman, 2001)。然而,结果是不一致的,部分原因是几乎只使用了专注于自尊的明确测量方法。Freeman(2007)提出,对自我和他人的评价信念是一个比自尊更稳定的指标和更好的预测因子。然后,本研究探讨了偏执患者(n = 79)、抑郁症患者(n = 38)和健康对照组(n = 52)在自我和他人的外显和内隐概念上的差异。结果表明,在外显水平上,临床组对自我的负面评价信念多于对照组,但对他人的负面评价信念在两组间无显著差异。只有抑郁组的消极自我明显多于其他组。在内隐水平上,虽然患者的负性自我比对照组多,但差异不显著。其他内隐指标组间也无差异。而对照组则呈现与外显相反的内隐模式,他人指数显著负向高于自我指数。本研究强调了在不同加工维度上探索自我与他人概念的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
El concepto de self y de otros en los delirios persecutorios

Some psychological theories about persecutory delusions emphasize the importance of the concepts of self and others (Bentall, Corcoran, Howard, Blackwood, & Kinderman, 2001). However, results are inconsistent, in part due to an almost exclusive usage of explicit measures focusing on self-esteem. Freeman (2007) has proposed that evaluative beliefs about self and others are a more stable indicator and a better predictor than self-esteem. Then, this study explored the differences in the explicit and implicit conception of self and others between patients with paranoia (n = 79), depression (n = 38), and a healthy control group (n = 52). The results showed that at the explicit level clinical groups had more negative evaluative beliefs about the self than controls, but there were no differences in evaluative beliefs about others between groups. Only the depression group showed a significantly more negative self than others. At implicit level, although patients had a more negative self than controls, these differences were not significant. There were no differences between groups in implicit indexes of others either. However, the control group presented an implicit pattern opposite to the explicit one, in which the index of others was significantly more negative than the index self. This study highlights the importance of exploring self together with the concept of others at different dimensions of processing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinica Y Salud
Clinica Y Salud PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
16
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sobre la Validez y Eficacia de la Hipnosis Clínica. Valoración Crítica del Documento Observatorio OMC contra las Pseudociencias, Pseudoterapias, Intrusismo y Sectas Sanitarias en relación con la Hipnoterapia Un estudio de caso de trastorno adaptativo con ansiedad por situación de sobrecarga laboral Trastorno de síntomas somáticos: de la sospecha de simulación al tratamiento cognitivo-conductual Psychological characteristics of dissociation in general population Espiritualmente resilientes. Relación entre espiritualidad y resiliencia en cuidados paliativos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1