适应性接管概念:考虑部分接管和渐进接管

Timotej Gruden, G. Jakus
{"title":"适应性接管概念:考虑部分接管和渐进接管","authors":"Timotej Gruden, G. Jakus","doi":"10.1145/3544999.3552315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we explore a novel three-stage take-over (TO) concept for conditionally autonomous vehicles (SAE L3). In a user study in a driving simulator, we evaluated the usability of four different TO concepts: a) a basic concept including only a single TO request, b) a partial take-over (PTO) concept, where the longitudinal coordination of the vehicle remains automatic, when a TO is performed by steering only, c) a concept with an improved minimum safety manoeuvre (MSM) with additional warnings and automatic braking manoeuvres, and d) a TO concept including both PTO and MSM. The results showed that when PTO and MSM were both used, the minimal time-to-collision (TTC) was longer on average, and the maximal lateral acceleration was lower on average compared to the basic or PTO concepts. In addition, significantly fewer collisions were observed when using PTO+MSM compared to the basic TO concept.","PeriodicalId":350782,"journal":{"name":"Adjunct Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptable Take-Over Concepts: Considering Partial and Gradual Take-Overs\",\"authors\":\"Timotej Gruden, G. Jakus\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3544999.3552315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we explore a novel three-stage take-over (TO) concept for conditionally autonomous vehicles (SAE L3). In a user study in a driving simulator, we evaluated the usability of four different TO concepts: a) a basic concept including only a single TO request, b) a partial take-over (PTO) concept, where the longitudinal coordination of the vehicle remains automatic, when a TO is performed by steering only, c) a concept with an improved minimum safety manoeuvre (MSM) with additional warnings and automatic braking manoeuvres, and d) a TO concept including both PTO and MSM. The results showed that when PTO and MSM were both used, the minimal time-to-collision (TTC) was longer on average, and the maximal lateral acceleration was lower on average compared to the basic or PTO concepts. In addition, significantly fewer collisions were observed when using PTO+MSM compared to the basic TO concept.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adjunct Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adjunct Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3544999.3552315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adjunct Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3544999.3552315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们为有条件自动驾驶汽车(SAE L3)探索了一种新的三阶段接管(TO)概念。在驾驶模拟器的用户研究中,我们评估了四种不同TO概念的可用性:a)仅包括单个TO请求的基本概念,b)部分接管(PTO)概念,当仅通过转向执行TO时,车辆的纵向协调仍然是自动的,c)具有改进的最小安全机动(MSM)的概念,附加警告和自动制动机动,以及d)包括PTO和MSM的TO概念。结果表明,与基本概念和PTO概念相比,PTO和MSM同时使用时,最小碰撞时间(TTC)平均更长,最大横向加速度平均更低。此外,与基本的to概念相比,使用PTO+MSM时观察到的碰撞明显减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adaptable Take-Over Concepts: Considering Partial and Gradual Take-Overs
In this paper, we explore a novel three-stage take-over (TO) concept for conditionally autonomous vehicles (SAE L3). In a user study in a driving simulator, we evaluated the usability of four different TO concepts: a) a basic concept including only a single TO request, b) a partial take-over (PTO) concept, where the longitudinal coordination of the vehicle remains automatic, when a TO is performed by steering only, c) a concept with an improved minimum safety manoeuvre (MSM) with additional warnings and automatic braking manoeuvres, and d) a TO concept including both PTO and MSM. The results showed that when PTO and MSM were both used, the minimal time-to-collision (TTC) was longer on average, and the maximal lateral acceleration was lower on average compared to the basic or PTO concepts. In addition, significantly fewer collisions were observed when using PTO+MSM compared to the basic TO concept.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toward a High-Level Integrative Comfort Model in Autonomous Driving Design for Perception - A Systematic Approach for the Design of Driving Automation Systems based on the Users’ Perception Using Task Switching to Explain Effects of Non-Driving Related Activities on Takeover and Manual Driving Behavior Following Level 3 Automated Driving Increasing Driving Safety and In-Vehicle Gesture-Based Menu Navigation Accuracy with a Heads-up Display Simulator-Based Study of the Response Time and Defensive Behavior of Drivers in Unexpected Dangers at an Intersection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1