通过预测调整组件和系统资格测试

D. Braden, D. Harvey
{"title":"通过预测调整组件和系统资格测试","authors":"D. Braden, D. Harvey","doi":"10.1109/ESTC.2014.6962791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a continual growth of test and validation in high reliability product applications such as automotive, military and avionics. Principally this is driven by increased use and complexity of electronic systems installed in vehicles in addition to increased end user reliability expectations. Furthermore product development cycles continue to reduce, resulting in less available time to perform accelerated life tests. Moreover, significant increases in test duration are observed as a direct result of raised reliability expectations. The challenge for automotive electronic suppliers in particular is performing life tests in shorter periods of time whilst reducing the overall associated costs of validation testing. The dichotomy is that reliability testing at the component level does not replicate the intended mission environment. Often this can result in disputes between component suppliers and end users. The focus for many component suppliers is on the thermal performance of devices, but real applications require other factors to be considered, such as manufacturing influences during circuit board manufacture and assembly, mechanical stresses and device interactions. Furthermore, previous work by the authors suggests that interconnect and system level reliability is significantly impacted by component layout and constraint points which are application specific [1] [2] [3]. In this paper, a review of suitable prognostic techniques is undertaken and an approach proposed in which reliability testing results at component level matches more closely that undertaken at system level.","PeriodicalId":299981,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th Electronics System-integration Technology Conference (ESTC)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aligning component and system qualification testing through prognostics\",\"authors\":\"D. Braden, D. Harvey\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESTC.2014.6962791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a continual growth of test and validation in high reliability product applications such as automotive, military and avionics. Principally this is driven by increased use and complexity of electronic systems installed in vehicles in addition to increased end user reliability expectations. Furthermore product development cycles continue to reduce, resulting in less available time to perform accelerated life tests. Moreover, significant increases in test duration are observed as a direct result of raised reliability expectations. The challenge for automotive electronic suppliers in particular is performing life tests in shorter periods of time whilst reducing the overall associated costs of validation testing. The dichotomy is that reliability testing at the component level does not replicate the intended mission environment. Often this can result in disputes between component suppliers and end users. The focus for many component suppliers is on the thermal performance of devices, but real applications require other factors to be considered, such as manufacturing influences during circuit board manufacture and assembly, mechanical stresses and device interactions. Furthermore, previous work by the authors suggests that interconnect and system level reliability is significantly impacted by component layout and constraint points which are application specific [1] [2] [3]. In this paper, a review of suitable prognostic techniques is undertaken and an approach proposed in which reliability testing results at component level matches more closely that undertaken at system level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 5th Electronics System-integration Technology Conference (ESTC)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 5th Electronics System-integration Technology Conference (ESTC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESTC.2014.6962791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th Electronics System-integration Technology Conference (ESTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESTC.2014.6962791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在汽车、军事和航空电子等高可靠性产品应用中,测试和验证的需求不断增长。这主要是由于车辆中安装的电子系统的使用和复杂性的增加,以及最终用户对可靠性的期望的提高。此外,产品开发周期不断缩短,导致进行加速寿命测试的可用时间减少。此外,测试持续时间的显著增加是可靠性期望提高的直接结果。汽车电子供应商尤其面临的挑战是在更短的时间内进行寿命测试,同时降低验证测试的总体相关成本。二分法是组件级别的可靠性测试不能复制预期的任务环境。这通常会导致组件供应商和最终用户之间的纠纷。许多元件供应商的重点是器件的热性能,但实际应用需要考虑其他因素,例如电路板制造和组装过程中的制造影响、机械应力和器件相互作用。此外,作者先前的工作表明,互连和系统级可靠性受到组件布局和约束点的显着影响,这些约束点是特定于应用的[1][2][3]。在本文中,对适当的预测技术进行了回顾,并提出了一种方法,其中组件级别的可靠性测试结果比系统级别的可靠性测试结果更接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aligning component and system qualification testing through prognostics
There is a continual growth of test and validation in high reliability product applications such as automotive, military and avionics. Principally this is driven by increased use and complexity of electronic systems installed in vehicles in addition to increased end user reliability expectations. Furthermore product development cycles continue to reduce, resulting in less available time to perform accelerated life tests. Moreover, significant increases in test duration are observed as a direct result of raised reliability expectations. The challenge for automotive electronic suppliers in particular is performing life tests in shorter periods of time whilst reducing the overall associated costs of validation testing. The dichotomy is that reliability testing at the component level does not replicate the intended mission environment. Often this can result in disputes between component suppliers and end users. The focus for many component suppliers is on the thermal performance of devices, but real applications require other factors to be considered, such as manufacturing influences during circuit board manufacture and assembly, mechanical stresses and device interactions. Furthermore, previous work by the authors suggests that interconnect and system level reliability is significantly impacted by component layout and constraint points which are application specific [1] [2] [3]. In this paper, a review of suitable prognostic techniques is undertaken and an approach proposed in which reliability testing results at component level matches more closely that undertaken at system level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of an electro-optical circuit board technology with embedded single-mode glass waveguide layer Influence of soft sensor chip bonds on the formation of wire bond interconnections Integrated printed hybrid electronics on paper Flip-chip bonding processes with low volume SoP technology Reliability performance of Au-Sn and Cu-Sn wafer level SLID bonds for MEMS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1