{"title":"对税盾估值的再思考","authors":"E. R. Arzac, L. Glosten","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.492603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"A quarter-century ago, Miles and Ezzell l1980r solved the valuation problem of a firm that follows a constant leverage ratio L e D/S. However, to this day, the proper discounting of free cash flows and the computation of WACC are often misunderstood by scholars and practitioners alike. For example, it is common for textbooks and fairness opinions to discount free cash flows at WACC with beta input β\" S e [1 p l1 - \"τ\"r\"L\"]\"β\" \"u\" , \"although the latter is not consistent with the assumption of constant leverage. This confusion extends to the valuation of tax shields and the proper implementation of adjusted present value procedures. In this paper, we derive a general result on the value of tax shields, obtain the correct value of tax shields for perpetuities, and state the correct valuation formulas for arbitrary cash flows under a constant leverage financial policy.\" Copyright Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2005.","PeriodicalId":275816,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: European Financial Management Journal","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"138","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Reconsideration of Tax Shield Valuation\",\"authors\":\"E. R. Arzac, L. Glosten\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.492603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"A quarter-century ago, Miles and Ezzell l1980r solved the valuation problem of a firm that follows a constant leverage ratio L e D/S. However, to this day, the proper discounting of free cash flows and the computation of WACC are often misunderstood by scholars and practitioners alike. For example, it is common for textbooks and fairness opinions to discount free cash flows at WACC with beta input β\\\" S e [1 p l1 - \\\"τ\\\"r\\\"L\\\"]\\\"β\\\" \\\"u\\\" , \\\"although the latter is not consistent with the assumption of constant leverage. This confusion extends to the valuation of tax shields and the proper implementation of adjusted present value procedures. In this paper, we derive a general result on the value of tax shields, obtain the correct value of tax shields for perpetuities, and state the correct valuation formulas for arbitrary cash flows under a constant leverage financial policy.\\\" Copyright Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2005.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: European Financial Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"138\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: European Financial Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.492603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: European Financial Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.492603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 138
摘要
25年前,Miles和Ezzell在1980年解决了一家公司的估值问题,该公司遵循恒定的杠杆比率(L / D/S)。然而,直到今天,自由现金流的适当折现和WACC的计算经常被学者和从业者所误解。例如,教科书和公平意见通常用β输入β“S”e [1 p l1 -“τ”r“L”]“β”“u”来贴现WACC的自由现金流,尽管后者与恒定杠杆的假设不一致。这种混淆延伸到税盾的估值和调整后现值程序的适当实施。在本文中,我们得到了关于税盾价值的一般结果,得到了永续投资税盾的正确价值,并给出了恒定杠杆金融政策下任意现金流量的正确估值公式。版权所有布莱克威尔出版有限公司,2005。
"A quarter-century ago, Miles and Ezzell l1980r solved the valuation problem of a firm that follows a constant leverage ratio L e D/S. However, to this day, the proper discounting of free cash flows and the computation of WACC are often misunderstood by scholars and practitioners alike. For example, it is common for textbooks and fairness opinions to discount free cash flows at WACC with beta input β" S e [1 p l1 - "τ"r"L"]"β" "u" , "although the latter is not consistent with the assumption of constant leverage. This confusion extends to the valuation of tax shields and the proper implementation of adjusted present value procedures. In this paper, we derive a general result on the value of tax shields, obtain the correct value of tax shields for perpetuities, and state the correct valuation formulas for arbitrary cash flows under a constant leverage financial policy." Copyright Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2005.