这是否真的能使患有严重呼吸综合症的成年人

G. Sofianos
{"title":"这是否真的能使患有严重呼吸综合症的成年人","authors":"G. Sofianos","doi":"10.1159/000500147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Surfactant is usually deficiency in adult acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients and surfactant administration may be a useful therapy. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the effect of surfactant administration on outcomes of adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane database, Elsevier, Web of Science and http://clinicaltrials.gov were searched and investigated until December 2017. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surfactant administration with general therapy in adult patients with ARDS were enrolled. The primary outcome was mortality (7-10-day, 28-30-day and 90-180-day). Secondary outcome included oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 ratio). Demographic variables, surfactant administration, and outcomes were retrieved. Sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the impact of study quality issues on the overall effect. Funnel plot inspection, Egger's and Begger's test were applied to investigate the publication bias. Internal validity was assessed with the risk of bias tool. Random errors were evaluated with trial sequential analysis (TSA). Quality levels were assessed by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology (GRADE). Results: Eleven RCTs with 3038 patients were identified. Surfactant administration could not improve mortality of adult patients [Risk ratio (RR) (95%CI)) = 1.02(0.93-1.12), p = 0.65]. Subgroup analysis revealed no difference of 7-10-day mortality [RR(95%CI)) = 0.89(0.54-1.49), p = 0.66], 28-30-day mortality[RR(95%CI) = 1.00(0.89-1.12), p = 0.98] and 90-180-day mortality [RR(95%CI) = 1.11(0.94-1.32), p = 0.22] between surfactant group and control group. The change of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in adult ARDS patients had no difference [MD(95%CI) = 0.06(− 0.12-0.24), p = 0.5] after surfactant administration. Finally, TSA and GRADE indicated lack of firm evidence for a beneficial effect. Conclusions: Surfactant administration has not been shown to improve mortality and improve oxygenation for adult ARDS patients. Large rigorous randomized trials are needed to explore the effect of surfactant to adult ARDS patients.","PeriodicalId":306175,"journal":{"name":"Karger Kompass Pneumologie","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ist die Gabe von Surfactant bei erwachsenen Patienten mit akutem Atemnotsyndrom berechtigt?\",\"authors\":\"G. Sofianos\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000500147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Surfactant is usually deficiency in adult acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients and surfactant administration may be a useful therapy. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the effect of surfactant administration on outcomes of adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane database, Elsevier, Web of Science and http://clinicaltrials.gov were searched and investigated until December 2017. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surfactant administration with general therapy in adult patients with ARDS were enrolled. The primary outcome was mortality (7-10-day, 28-30-day and 90-180-day). Secondary outcome included oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 ratio). Demographic variables, surfactant administration, and outcomes were retrieved. Sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the impact of study quality issues on the overall effect. Funnel plot inspection, Egger's and Begger's test were applied to investigate the publication bias. Internal validity was assessed with the risk of bias tool. Random errors were evaluated with trial sequential analysis (TSA). Quality levels were assessed by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology (GRADE). Results: Eleven RCTs with 3038 patients were identified. Surfactant administration could not improve mortality of adult patients [Risk ratio (RR) (95%CI)) = 1.02(0.93-1.12), p = 0.65]. Subgroup analysis revealed no difference of 7-10-day mortality [RR(95%CI)) = 0.89(0.54-1.49), p = 0.66], 28-30-day mortality[RR(95%CI) = 1.00(0.89-1.12), p = 0.98] and 90-180-day mortality [RR(95%CI) = 1.11(0.94-1.32), p = 0.22] between surfactant group and control group. The change of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in adult ARDS patients had no difference [MD(95%CI) = 0.06(− 0.12-0.24), p = 0.5] after surfactant administration. Finally, TSA and GRADE indicated lack of firm evidence for a beneficial effect. Conclusions: Surfactant administration has not been shown to improve mortality and improve oxygenation for adult ARDS patients. Large rigorous randomized trials are needed to explore the effect of surfactant to adult ARDS patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Karger Kompass Pneumologie\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Karger Kompass Pneumologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000500147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karger Kompass Pneumologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000500147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者通常缺乏表面活性剂,表面活性剂可能是一种有效的治疗方法。本研究的目的是对表面活性剂给药对急性呼吸窘迫综合征成年患者预后的影响进行荟萃分析。方法:检索PubMed、EMBASE、Medline、Cochrane数据库、Elsevier、Web of Science和http://clinicaltrials.gov,检索至2017年12月。随机对照试验(rct)比较表面活性物质治疗与普通治疗对成年ARDS患者的影响。主要终点为死亡率(7-10天、28-30天和90-180天)。次要终点包括氧合(PaO2/FiO2比率)。统计变量,表面活性剂的使用和结果被检索。敏感性分析用于评估研究质量问题对总体效果的影响。采用漏斗图检验、Egger’s和Begger’s检验检验发表偏倚。使用偏倚风险工具评估内部效度。随机误差评价采用试验序列分析(TSA)。质量水平通过分级推荐评估、发展和评价方法(GRADE)进行评估。结果:11项随机对照试验共纳入3038例患者。表面活性剂不能改善成人患者的死亡率[危险比(RR) (95%CI) = 1.02(0.93-1.12), p = 0.65]。亚组分析显示,表面活性剂组7-10天死亡率[RR(95%CI) = 0.89(0.54-1.49), p = 0.66]、28-30天死亡率[RR(95%CI) = 1.00(0.89-1.12), p = 0.98]、90-180天死亡率[RR(95%CI) = 1.11(0.94-1.32), p = 0.22]与对照组无显著差异。给予表面活性剂后成人ARDS患者PaO2/FiO2比值变化无显著性差异[MD(95%CI) = 0.06(- 0.12-0.24), p = 0.5]。最后,TSA和GRADE表明缺乏有效的证据。结论:表面活性物质的使用并不能改善成人ARDS患者的死亡率和氧合。表面活性剂对成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的影响尚需大量严格的随机试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ist die Gabe von Surfactant bei erwachsenen Patienten mit akutem Atemnotsyndrom berechtigt?
Introduction: Surfactant is usually deficiency in adult acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients and surfactant administration may be a useful therapy. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the effect of surfactant administration on outcomes of adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane database, Elsevier, Web of Science and http://clinicaltrials.gov were searched and investigated until December 2017. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surfactant administration with general therapy in adult patients with ARDS were enrolled. The primary outcome was mortality (7-10-day, 28-30-day and 90-180-day). Secondary outcome included oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 ratio). Demographic variables, surfactant administration, and outcomes were retrieved. Sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the impact of study quality issues on the overall effect. Funnel plot inspection, Egger's and Begger's test were applied to investigate the publication bias. Internal validity was assessed with the risk of bias tool. Random errors were evaluated with trial sequential analysis (TSA). Quality levels were assessed by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology (GRADE). Results: Eleven RCTs with 3038 patients were identified. Surfactant administration could not improve mortality of adult patients [Risk ratio (RR) (95%CI)) = 1.02(0.93-1.12), p = 0.65]. Subgroup analysis revealed no difference of 7-10-day mortality [RR(95%CI)) = 0.89(0.54-1.49), p = 0.66], 28-30-day mortality[RR(95%CI) = 1.00(0.89-1.12), p = 0.98] and 90-180-day mortality [RR(95%CI) = 1.11(0.94-1.32), p = 0.22] between surfactant group and control group. The change of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in adult ARDS patients had no difference [MD(95%CI) = 0.06(− 0.12-0.24), p = 0.5] after surfactant administration. Finally, TSA and GRADE indicated lack of firm evidence for a beneficial effect. Conclusions: Surfactant administration has not been shown to improve mortality and improve oxygenation for adult ARDS patients. Large rigorous randomized trials are needed to explore the effect of surfactant to adult ARDS patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Zentrale Schlafapnoe bei Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz: Physiologische Auswirkungen der periodischen Beatmung Kaleidoskop Malignes Mesotheliom: Die diagnostische Aussagekraft einer Computertomographie kritisch hinterfragen Pneumocampus PharmaNews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1