社会促进对女性两项精神运动任务表现的影响

A. Bird
{"title":"社会促进对女性两项精神运动任务表现的影响","authors":"A. Bird","doi":"10.1080/10671188.1973.10615210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this investigation was to test the effects of the presence of an audience as compared to a co-action group setting during performance of two different psychomotor tasks. Social facilitation theory predicts identical social influences resulting from either condition and does not take into account the nature of the task performed. Ninety female subjects were randomly selected from a voluntary population of 238. Thirty subjects were then randomly assigned to each of three treatment conditions: alone, audience, and co-action. All subjects performed three trials on each task: hand-steadiness and manual dexterity. Separate ANOVA was completed for performance on each task. When a significant F ratio was obtained the Tukey Method for multiple comparisons of means was applied. The results showed some support for the hypothesis that the effects of an audience and a co-action group setting are not identical. The co-action group performed significantly better than the audience group on both ta...","PeriodicalId":192960,"journal":{"name":"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1973-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Social Facilitation upon Females' Performance of two Psychomotor Tasks\",\"authors\":\"A. Bird\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10671188.1973.10615210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The purpose of this investigation was to test the effects of the presence of an audience as compared to a co-action group setting during performance of two different psychomotor tasks. Social facilitation theory predicts identical social influences resulting from either condition and does not take into account the nature of the task performed. Ninety female subjects were randomly selected from a voluntary population of 238. Thirty subjects were then randomly assigned to each of three treatment conditions: alone, audience, and co-action. All subjects performed three trials on each task: hand-steadiness and manual dexterity. Separate ANOVA was completed for performance on each task. When a significant F ratio was obtained the Tukey Method for multiple comparisons of means was applied. The results showed some support for the hypothesis that the effects of an audience and a co-action group setting are not identical. The co-action group performed significantly better than the audience group on both ta...\",\"PeriodicalId\":192960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1973-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1973.10615210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1973.10615210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是测试在执行两种不同的精神运动任务时,观众在场与合作小组设置的影响。社会促进理论预测,这两种情况都会产生相同的社会影响,而且没有考虑到所执行任务的性质。从238名自愿人群中随机抽取90名女性受试者。然后,30名受试者被随机分配到三种治疗条件中的每一种:单独、旁听和合作。所有的研究对象在每个任务上都进行了三个测试:手的稳定性和手的灵活性。对每个任务的表现进行单独的方差分析。当获得显著的F比时,采用多重均值比较的Tukey方法。研究结果在一定程度上支持了一个假设,即观众和合作小组的影响并不相同。在这两方面,合作组的表现都明显好于观众组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Social Facilitation upon Females' Performance of two Psychomotor Tasks
Abstract The purpose of this investigation was to test the effects of the presence of an audience as compared to a co-action group setting during performance of two different psychomotor tasks. Social facilitation theory predicts identical social influences resulting from either condition and does not take into account the nature of the task performed. Ninety female subjects were randomly selected from a voluntary population of 238. Thirty subjects were then randomly assigned to each of three treatment conditions: alone, audience, and co-action. All subjects performed three trials on each task: hand-steadiness and manual dexterity. Separate ANOVA was completed for performance on each task. When a significant F ratio was obtained the Tukey Method for multiple comparisons of means was applied. The results showed some support for the hypothesis that the effects of an audience and a co-action group setting are not identical. The co-action group performed significantly better than the audience group on both ta...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exercise-Induced Activation and Human Performance: A Review A Somatotype Dispersion Index Prediction of Endurance Performance and Oxygen Consumption from Cardiac Time Components An Improved Stabilometer Task Apparatus Family Influence and Involvement in Sports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1