{"title":"超越凸性:局部搜索和平衡计算","authors":"S. Teng","doi":"10.1145/1807406.1807469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that an equilibrium point of a zero-sum two-player game can be computed in polynomial time using linear programming while the computation of a Nash equilibrium in a general two-player game is PPAD complete. In parallel, an Arrow-Debreu equilibrium price of an exchange market of traders with linear utilities is polynomial-time computable using convex programming, while the computation of an equilibrium price of an exchange market with linearly separable piece-wise linear utilities is PPAD complete. This convexity based dichotomy is fascinating in my view. In this talk I would like to discuss some of our recent work about the mathematical and complexity structure of equilibria, both for fixed-point-based Nash and market equilibria and for potential-function-based network equilibria that can be found by any local search procedure. I would also like to touch on the questions such as \"Is local search fundamentally easier than fixed point computation?\"","PeriodicalId":142982,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Quantitative Game Theory","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond convexity: local search and equilibrium computation\",\"authors\":\"S. Teng\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1807406.1807469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well known that an equilibrium point of a zero-sum two-player game can be computed in polynomial time using linear programming while the computation of a Nash equilibrium in a general two-player game is PPAD complete. In parallel, an Arrow-Debreu equilibrium price of an exchange market of traders with linear utilities is polynomial-time computable using convex programming, while the computation of an equilibrium price of an exchange market with linearly separable piece-wise linear utilities is PPAD complete. This convexity based dichotomy is fascinating in my view. In this talk I would like to discuss some of our recent work about the mathematical and complexity structure of equilibria, both for fixed-point-based Nash and market equilibria and for potential-function-based network equilibria that can be found by any local search procedure. I would also like to touch on the questions such as \\\"Is local search fundamentally easier than fixed point computation?\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":142982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral and Quantitative Game Theory\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral and Quantitative Game Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1807406.1807469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Quantitative Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1807406.1807469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond convexity: local search and equilibrium computation
It is well known that an equilibrium point of a zero-sum two-player game can be computed in polynomial time using linear programming while the computation of a Nash equilibrium in a general two-player game is PPAD complete. In parallel, an Arrow-Debreu equilibrium price of an exchange market of traders with linear utilities is polynomial-time computable using convex programming, while the computation of an equilibrium price of an exchange market with linearly separable piece-wise linear utilities is PPAD complete. This convexity based dichotomy is fascinating in my view. In this talk I would like to discuss some of our recent work about the mathematical and complexity structure of equilibria, both for fixed-point-based Nash and market equilibria and for potential-function-based network equilibria that can be found by any local search procedure. I would also like to touch on the questions such as "Is local search fundamentally easier than fixed point computation?"