活体肾供体移植未来多学科研讨会报告。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Progress in Transplantation Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-15 DOI:10.1177/15269248231212911
Thomas G Peters, John J Fung, Janet Radcliffe-Richards, Sally Satel, Alvin E Roth, Frank McCormick, Martha Gershun, Arthur J Matas, John P Roberts, Josh Morrison, Glenn M Chertow, Laurie D Lee, Philip J Held, Akinlolu Ojo
{"title":"活体肾供体移植未来多学科研讨会报告。","authors":"Thomas G Peters, John J Fung, Janet Radcliffe-Richards, Sally Satel, Alvin E Roth, Frank McCormick, Martha Gershun, Arthur J Matas, John P Roberts, Josh Morrison, Glenn M Chertow, Laurie D Lee, Philip J Held, Akinlolu Ojo","doi":"10.1177/15269248231212911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Virtually all clinicians agree that living donor renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for permanent loss of kidney function. Yet, living donor kidney transplantation has not grown in the United States for more than 2 decades. A virtual symposium gathered experts to examine this shortcoming and to stimulate and clarify issues salient to improving living donation. The ethical principles of rewarding kidney donors and the limits of altruism as the exclusive compelling stimulus for donation were emphasized. Concepts that donor incentives could save up to 40 000 lives annually and considerable taxpayer dollars were examined, and survey data confirmed voter support for donor compensation. Objections to rewarding donors were also presented. Living donor kidney exchanges and limited numbers of deceased donor kidneys were reviewed. Discussants found consensus that attempts to increase living donation should include removing artificial barriers in donor evaluation, expansion of living donor chains, affirming the safety of live kidney donation, and assurance that donors incur no expense. If the current legal and practice standards persist, living kidney donation will fail to achieve its true potential to save lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Report From a Multidisciplinary Symposium on the Future of Living Kidney Donor Transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas G Peters, John J Fung, Janet Radcliffe-Richards, Sally Satel, Alvin E Roth, Frank McCormick, Martha Gershun, Arthur J Matas, John P Roberts, Josh Morrison, Glenn M Chertow, Laurie D Lee, Philip J Held, Akinlolu Ojo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15269248231212911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Virtually all clinicians agree that living donor renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for permanent loss of kidney function. Yet, living donor kidney transplantation has not grown in the United States for more than 2 decades. A virtual symposium gathered experts to examine this shortcoming and to stimulate and clarify issues salient to improving living donation. The ethical principles of rewarding kidney donors and the limits of altruism as the exclusive compelling stimulus for donation were emphasized. Concepts that donor incentives could save up to 40 000 lives annually and considerable taxpayer dollars were examined, and survey data confirmed voter support for donor compensation. Objections to rewarding donors were also presented. Living donor kidney exchanges and limited numbers of deceased donor kidneys were reviewed. Discussants found consensus that attempts to increase living donation should include removing artificial barriers in donor evaluation, expansion of living donor chains, affirming the safety of live kidney donation, and assurance that donors incur no expense. If the current legal and practice standards persist, living kidney donation will fail to achieve its true potential to save lives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248231212911\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248231212911","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几乎所有的临床医生都同意活体肾移植是永久性肾功能丧失的最佳治疗方法。然而,活体肾脏移植在美国已有20多年没有增长。一个虚拟研讨会聚集了专家来审查这一缺点,并激发和澄清改善活体捐赠的突出问题。强调了奖励肾脏捐赠者的伦理原则和利他主义作为捐赠的唯一强制性刺激的局限性。对捐助者奖励每年可挽救多达4万人的生命和大量纳税人资金的概念进行了审查,调查数据证实选民支持捐助者补偿。也有人提出反对奖励捐助者。活体供体肾脏交换和有限数量的已故供体肾脏进行了回顾。与会嘉宾一致认为,增加活体捐赠的努力应包括消除对捐赠者评估的人为障碍、扩大活体捐赠者链、确认活体肾脏捐赠的安全性以及确保捐赠者不承担任何费用。如果现行的法律和实践标准持续下去,活体肾脏捐赠将无法发挥其拯救生命的真正潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Report From a Multidisciplinary Symposium on the Future of Living Kidney Donor Transplantation.

Virtually all clinicians agree that living donor renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for permanent loss of kidney function. Yet, living donor kidney transplantation has not grown in the United States for more than 2 decades. A virtual symposium gathered experts to examine this shortcoming and to stimulate and clarify issues salient to improving living donation. The ethical principles of rewarding kidney donors and the limits of altruism as the exclusive compelling stimulus for donation were emphasized. Concepts that donor incentives could save up to 40 000 lives annually and considerable taxpayer dollars were examined, and survey data confirmed voter support for donor compensation. Objections to rewarding donors were also presented. Living donor kidney exchanges and limited numbers of deceased donor kidneys were reviewed. Discussants found consensus that attempts to increase living donation should include removing artificial barriers in donor evaluation, expansion of living donor chains, affirming the safety of live kidney donation, and assurance that donors incur no expense. If the current legal and practice standards persist, living kidney donation will fail to achieve its true potential to save lives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Transplantation
Progress in Transplantation SURGERY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Transplantation (PIT) is the official journal of NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals. Journal Partners include: Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association and Society for Transplant Social Workers. PIT reflects the multi-disciplinary team approach to procurement and clinical aspects of organ and tissue transplantation by providing a professional forum for exchange of the continually changing body of knowledge in transplantation.
期刊最新文献
Four Decades of Research Productivity and Hot Spots in Pancreas Transplantation. A Mixed Method Study in Young Children Participating in Clinical Research During A Kidney Transplantation Trajectory. Culturally Safe Care Barriers and Facilitators in Organ Transplantation and Donation According to First Nations and Health Professionals in Quebec, Canada. Patient Perspectives on the Use of Aging Metrics for Kidney Transplant Decision-Making. A Comparative Study of Cognitive and Motor Performance in Liver Recipients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1