细胞生命系统组织问题中学生科学过程技能测试的发展与验证:Rasch模型分析

Sigit Subagja, Bibin Rubini, Surti Kurniasih
{"title":"细胞生命系统组织问题中学生科学过程技能测试的发展与验证:Rasch模型分析","authors":"Sigit Subagja, Bibin Rubini, Surti Kurniasih","doi":"10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to develop and implement the instrument of science process skills tests on cellular living system organization matter, explicitly designed for secondary students. The indicators developed include formulating hypotheses, communicating, applying concepts, asking questions, observing, planning experiments, using laboratory tools, classifying, and interpreting data. The steps of this research are theoretical construction, determining the purpose of the assessment, constructing indicator items, compiling the items, expert judgment, instrument revision, field trials, and finalization of the instrument. The Science Process skills test consisted of 27 multiple-choice questions. The subject was 30 secondary school students. Data were analyzed using Rasch analysis. Evidence of the validity and reliability of the tests are presented. The conclusion is that the science process skills test instrument is theoretically and empirically valid and reliable","PeriodicalId":490812,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a Test of Science Process Skills for Secondary Students on Cellular Living System Organization Matter: Rasch Model Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sigit Subagja, Bibin Rubini, Surti Kurniasih\",\"doi\":\"10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to develop and implement the instrument of science process skills tests on cellular living system organization matter, explicitly designed for secondary students. The indicators developed include formulating hypotheses, communicating, applying concepts, asking questions, observing, planning experiments, using laboratory tools, classifying, and interpreting data. The steps of this research are theoretical construction, determining the purpose of the assessment, constructing indicator items, compiling the items, expert judgment, instrument revision, field trials, and finalization of the instrument. The Science Process skills test consisted of 27 multiple-choice questions. The subject was 30 secondary school students. Data were analyzed using Rasch analysis. Evidence of the validity and reliability of the tests are presented. The conclusion is that the science process skills test instrument is theoretically and empirically valid and reliable\",\"PeriodicalId\":490812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在开发并实施一套专为中学生设计的细胞生命系统组织物质科学过程技能测验工具。制定的指标包括提出假设、交流、应用概念、提出问题、观察、计划实验、使用实验室工具、分类和解释数据。本研究的步骤为理论构建、评估目的确定、指标项目构建、项目编制、专家判断、工具修订、现场试验、工具定稿。科学过程技能测试包括27道选择题。实验对象是30名中学生。数据采用Rasch分析法进行分析。给出了测试的有效性和可靠性的证据。实验结果表明,科学过程技能测试仪器在理论和经验上都是有效可靠的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and Validation of a Test of Science Process Skills for Secondary Students on Cellular Living System Organization Matter: Rasch Model Analysis
This study aims to develop and implement the instrument of science process skills tests on cellular living system organization matter, explicitly designed for secondary students. The indicators developed include formulating hypotheses, communicating, applying concepts, asking questions, observing, planning experiments, using laboratory tools, classifying, and interpreting data. The steps of this research are theoretical construction, determining the purpose of the assessment, constructing indicator items, compiling the items, expert judgment, instrument revision, field trials, and finalization of the instrument. The Science Process skills test consisted of 27 multiple-choice questions. The subject was 30 secondary school students. Data were analyzed using Rasch analysis. Evidence of the validity and reliability of the tests are presented. The conclusion is that the science process skills test instrument is theoretically and empirically valid and reliable
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Scientific Approach-Based Learning Assisted by Question Cards and Ladder Snake Media for Evaluating Learning Outcomes Way of Biology Teachers to Train HOTS to the Students in Online Learning Process Literature Review of Online Learning Technology in Chemistry Lab Activities Effect of Geometry and Number of Seismic Stations on Micro-Earthquake (MEQ) Hypocenters in Geothermal Fields Effect of Organophosphate Insecticides in Cattle Farming Feed on FSH and LH Hormone Levels in Dairy Cows in Kediri and Pujon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1