回应:“从来都不是最强的:在关于质量的辩论中协调系统动力学的四个思想流派”-通过共享工具和技术加强该领域

IF 1.7 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT System Dynamics Review Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1002/sdr.1751
Robert Eberlein
{"title":"回应:“从来都不是最强的:在关于质量的辩论中协调系统动力学的四个思想流派”-通过共享工具和技术加强该领域","authors":"Robert Eberlein","doi":"10.1002/sdr.1751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"System Dynamics ReviewEarly View Letter to the Editor In response to: “Never the strongest: reconciling the four schools of thought in system dynamics in the debate on quality” —Strengthening the field through shared tools and techniques Robert Eberlein, Corresponding Author Robert Eberlein [email protected] orcid.org/0009-0001-8444-3030 isee systems, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA Correspondence to: Robert Eberlein, isee systems, 24 Hanover Street Suite 8A, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Robert Eberlein, Corresponding Author Robert Eberlein [email protected] orcid.org/0009-0001-8444-3030 isee systems, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA Correspondence to: Robert Eberlein, isee systems, 24 Hanover Street Suite 8A, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 24 October 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1751 Accepted by Andreas Größler Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. References Eberlein R, Chichakly K, Größler A, King-Beall A, Moyano IM, Armenia S 2017. “Recommendations for the Conference Submission and Review Process” a Report to the System Dynamics Society Policy Council. https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/PolicyCouncil/2017/summer/papers/P1019.pdf. Forrester JW. 2007. System dynamics—The next fifty years. System Dynamics Review 23(2–3): 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.381. Peterson DW, Eberlein R. 1994. Reality check: A bridge between systems thinking and system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 10(2–3): 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100205. Richardson G. 2017. Confidence in Exploratory Models. In System Dynamics Society Winter Camp: Albuquerque, NM. Richardson G 2023. “Building Confidence in Exploratory Models,” in Proceedings of the 2023 System Dynamics Conference. https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/2023/papers/P1002.pdf. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation","PeriodicalId":51500,"journal":{"name":"System Dynamics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In response to: “Never the strongest: reconciling the four schools of thought in system dynamics in the debate on quality” —Strengthening the field through shared tools and techniques\",\"authors\":\"Robert Eberlein\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sdr.1751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"System Dynamics ReviewEarly View Letter to the Editor In response to: “Never the strongest: reconciling the four schools of thought in system dynamics in the debate on quality” —Strengthening the field through shared tools and techniques Robert Eberlein, Corresponding Author Robert Eberlein [email protected] orcid.org/0009-0001-8444-3030 isee systems, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA Correspondence to: Robert Eberlein, isee systems, 24 Hanover Street Suite 8A, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Robert Eberlein, Corresponding Author Robert Eberlein [email protected] orcid.org/0009-0001-8444-3030 isee systems, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA Correspondence to: Robert Eberlein, isee systems, 24 Hanover Street Suite 8A, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 24 October 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1751 Accepted by Andreas Größler Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. References Eberlein R, Chichakly K, Größler A, King-Beall A, Moyano IM, Armenia S 2017. “Recommendations for the Conference Submission and Review Process” a Report to the System Dynamics Society Policy Council. https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/PolicyCouncil/2017/summer/papers/P1019.pdf. Forrester JW. 2007. System dynamics—The next fifty years. System Dynamics Review 23(2–3): 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.381. Peterson DW, Eberlein R. 1994. Reality check: A bridge between systems thinking and system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 10(2–3): 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100205. Richardson G. 2017. Confidence in Exploratory Models. In System Dynamics Society Winter Camp: Albuquerque, NM. Richardson G 2023. “Building Confidence in Exploratory Models,” in Proceedings of the 2023 System Dynamics Conference. https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/2023/papers/P1002.pdf. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation\",\"PeriodicalId\":51500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"System Dynamics Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"System Dynamics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1751\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System Dynamics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1751","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

系统动力学评论早期观点致编辑的信回应:“永远不是最强的:在质量辩论中协调系统动力学的四种思想流派”-通过共享工具和技术加强该领域罗伯特·埃伯莱因,通讯作者罗伯特·埃伯莱因[email protected] orcid.org/0009-0001-8444-3030 isee systems,黎巴嫩,新罕布什尔州,美国。通讯:罗伯特·埃伯莱因,isee systems, 24 Hanover Street Suite 8A,黎巴嫩,NH 03766,美国。E-mail: [email protected]搜索本文作者Robert Eberlein的更多论文,通讯作者Robert Eberlein [email protected] orcid.org/0009-0001-8444-3030 isee systems, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA。通讯地址:Robert Eberlein, isee systems, 24 Hanover Street Suite 8A, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA。E-mail: [email protected]搜索该作者的更多论文首次发表:2023年10月24日https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1751被Andreas接受Größler阅读全文taboutpdf ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare给予accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare请查看我们的使用条款和条件,并在下面的复选框中选择分享文章的全文版本。我已经阅读并接受了Wiley在线图书馆使用共享链接的条款和条件,请使用下面的链接与您的朋友和同事分享本文的全文版本。学习更多的知识。复制URL共享链接共享一个emailfacebooktwitterlinkedinreddit微信本文无摘要参考文献Eberlein R, Chichakly K, Größler A, King-Beall A, Moyano IM,亚美尼亚S 2017。“会议提交和审查过程的建议”,提交给系统动力学学会政策委员会的报告。https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/PolicyCouncil/2017/summer/papers/P1019.pdf。Forrester JW。2007. 系统动力学——未来50年。系统动力学评论23(2-3):359-370。https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.381。李建军,李建军。1994。现实检查:系统思考和系统动力学之间的桥梁。系统动力学评论10(2-3):159-174。https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100205。Richardson G. 2017。探索性模型的信心。在系统动力学学会冬令营:阿尔伯克基,新墨西哥州。理查森G 2023。“在探索性模型中建立信心”,载于2023年系统动力学会议论文集。https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/2023/papers/P1002.pdf。在问题包含之前的早期视图在线版本的记录参考信息
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In response to: “Never the strongest: reconciling the four schools of thought in system dynamics in the debate on quality” —Strengthening the field through shared tools and techniques
System Dynamics ReviewEarly View Letter to the Editor In response to: “Never the strongest: reconciling the four schools of thought in system dynamics in the debate on quality” —Strengthening the field through shared tools and techniques Robert Eberlein, Corresponding Author Robert Eberlein [email protected] orcid.org/0009-0001-8444-3030 isee systems, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA Correspondence to: Robert Eberlein, isee systems, 24 Hanover Street Suite 8A, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Robert Eberlein, Corresponding Author Robert Eberlein [email protected] orcid.org/0009-0001-8444-3030 isee systems, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA Correspondence to: Robert Eberlein, isee systems, 24 Hanover Street Suite 8A, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 24 October 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1751 Accepted by Andreas Größler Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. References Eberlein R, Chichakly K, Größler A, King-Beall A, Moyano IM, Armenia S 2017. “Recommendations for the Conference Submission and Review Process” a Report to the System Dynamics Society Policy Council. https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/PolicyCouncil/2017/summer/papers/P1019.pdf. Forrester JW. 2007. System dynamics—The next fifty years. System Dynamics Review 23(2–3): 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.381. Peterson DW, Eberlein R. 1994. Reality check: A bridge between systems thinking and system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 10(2–3): 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100205. Richardson G. 2017. Confidence in Exploratory Models. In System Dynamics Society Winter Camp: Albuquerque, NM. Richardson G 2023. “Building Confidence in Exploratory Models,” in Proceedings of the 2023 System Dynamics Conference. https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/2023/papers/P1002.pdf. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The System Dynamics Review exists to communicate to a wide audience advances in the application of the perspectives and methods of system dynamics to societal, technical, managerial, and environmental problems. The Review publishes: advances in mathematical modelling and computer simulation of dynamic feedback systems; advances in methods of policy analysis based on information feedback and circular causality; generic structures (dynamic feedback systems that support particular widely applicable behavioural insights); system dynamics contributions to theory building in the social and natural sciences; policy studies and debate emphasizing the role of feedback and circular causality in problem behaviour.
期刊最新文献
ARCHIVE PAPER: Micro worlds versus boundary objects in group model building: evidence from the literature on problem definition and model conceptualization (2007) Values‐based food procurement: Black farmers and structural racism in New York State Minding the abstraction gap: approaches supporting implementation Developing theoretically grounded causal maps to examine and improve policy narratives about global challenges Using system dynamics to support a functional exercise for pandemic preparedness and response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1