实验课能力测试计划:生物科学研究中一个有用而有力的教育工具

IF 1 4区 教育学 Q3 BIOLOGY Journal of Biological Education Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1080/00219266.2023.2271508
Juan M. Sanchez
{"title":"实验课能力测试计划:生物科学研究中一个有用而有力的教育工具","authors":"Juan M. Sanchez","doi":"10.1080/00219266.2023.2271508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBias assessment (systematic errors) is fundamental in industry and service laboratories, where reliable results must be obtained to give correct answers to specific problems. Therefore, knowledge and practice in quality methodologies is of fundamental importance for students. Unfortunately, laboratory lessons often focus on connecting theory and practice without developing the quality assurance skills that employers consider to be useful. Here, an external quality methodology based on proficiency testing schemes has been developed to introduce students to the methodologies and skills that are required to detect and find the source of biased results in the laboratory. It has been found that a large percentage of results obtained during laboratory lessons are in fact biased. The new methodology obliges students to practise how to detect biased results and, specially, the critical thinking skills that are needed to reveal the sources of bias in the laboratory. In the case study evaluated here, the application of the proposed methodology allowed students to detect the source of their biased result in 95% of the cases. Errors found were mainly due to personnel errors, as a consequence of deficits in basic hands-on skills and calculation errors.KEYWORDS: Quality controlproficiency testingsystematic errorslaboratorycritical thinking Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":54873,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biological Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proficiency testing schemes in laboratory lessons: a useful and powerful educational tool in bioscience studies\",\"authors\":\"Juan M. Sanchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00219266.2023.2271508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTBias assessment (systematic errors) is fundamental in industry and service laboratories, where reliable results must be obtained to give correct answers to specific problems. Therefore, knowledge and practice in quality methodologies is of fundamental importance for students. Unfortunately, laboratory lessons often focus on connecting theory and practice without developing the quality assurance skills that employers consider to be useful. Here, an external quality methodology based on proficiency testing schemes has been developed to introduce students to the methodologies and skills that are required to detect and find the source of biased results in the laboratory. It has been found that a large percentage of results obtained during laboratory lessons are in fact biased. The new methodology obliges students to practise how to detect biased results and, specially, the critical thinking skills that are needed to reveal the sources of bias in the laboratory. In the case study evaluated here, the application of the proposed methodology allowed students to detect the source of their biased result in 95% of the cases. Errors found were mainly due to personnel errors, as a consequence of deficits in basic hands-on skills and calculation errors.KEYWORDS: Quality controlproficiency testingsystematic errorslaboratorycritical thinking Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":54873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biological Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biological Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2023.2271508\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biological Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2023.2271508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要偏倚评估(系统误差)是工业和服务实验室的基础,必须获得可靠的结果才能对特定问题给出正确答案。因此,质量方法论的知识和实践对学生来说是至关重要的。不幸的是,实验室课程往往侧重于理论与实践的联系,而没有培养雇主认为有用的质量保证技能。在这里,开发了一种基于熟练程度测试方案的外部质量方法,向学生介绍在实验室中检测和找到有偏差结果来源所需的方法和技能。人们发现,在实验课上获得的大部分结果实际上是有偏差的。新的方法要求学生练习如何检测有偏差的结果,特别是批判性思维技能,这是在实验室中揭示偏差来源所需要的。在这里评估的案例研究中,所提出的方法的应用使学生能够在95%的案例中检测到他们的偏差结果的来源。发现的错误主要是由于人员错误,由于缺乏基本的动手技能和计算错误。关键词:质量控制熟练度测试系统误差实验室批判性思维披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Proficiency testing schemes in laboratory lessons: a useful and powerful educational tool in bioscience studies
ABSTRACTBias assessment (systematic errors) is fundamental in industry and service laboratories, where reliable results must be obtained to give correct answers to specific problems. Therefore, knowledge and practice in quality methodologies is of fundamental importance for students. Unfortunately, laboratory lessons often focus on connecting theory and practice without developing the quality assurance skills that employers consider to be useful. Here, an external quality methodology based on proficiency testing schemes has been developed to introduce students to the methodologies and skills that are required to detect and find the source of biased results in the laboratory. It has been found that a large percentage of results obtained during laboratory lessons are in fact biased. The new methodology obliges students to practise how to detect biased results and, specially, the critical thinking skills that are needed to reveal the sources of bias in the laboratory. In the case study evaluated here, the application of the proposed methodology allowed students to detect the source of their biased result in 95% of the cases. Errors found were mainly due to personnel errors, as a consequence of deficits in basic hands-on skills and calculation errors.KEYWORDS: Quality controlproficiency testingsystematic errorslaboratorycritical thinking Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
27.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Biological Education is firmly established as the authoritative voice in the world of biological education. The journal aims to bridge the gap between research and practice, providing information, ideas and opinion, in addition to critical examinations of advances in biology research and teaching. Through the coverage of policy and curriculum developments, the latest results of research into the teaching, learning and assessment of biology are brought to the fore. Special emphasis is placed on research relevant to educational practice, guided by educational realities in systems, schools, colleges and universities. Papers that are theoretically informed and methodologically rigorous are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Innovations in microbiological research education: a practical approach for investigating the effects of graphene oxide sheet nanomaterial on opportunistic pathogen viability Student informed development of virtual reality simulations for teaching and learning in the molecular sciences Peer-Interaction – collaborative learning to foster and observe conceptional transformation in science education Effects of online tours at the zoo and natural history museum on interest in extant and extinct animals Connecting plant science education in undergraduate life science courses to plant awareness disparity, Vision and Change, and sustainability careers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1