对Lubin和Reio“从教学设计师的角度:批判性地调查ID对协作在线课程开发的贡献的协调”的回应

IF 0.8 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1177/19394225231203652
Saul Carliner
{"title":"对Lubin和Reio“从教学设计师的角度:批判性地调查ID对协作在线课程开发的贡献的协调”的回应","authors":"Saul Carliner","doi":"10.1177/19394225231203652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This response provides a response to the Lubin and Reio article, Response to Lubin and Reio, “From the Standpoint of Instructional Designers: Critically Investigating the Coordination of ID Contributions to Collaborative Online Course Development.” Specifically, it explores persistent gaps in the literature on the relationships between faculty and of instructional designers when designing asynchronous online courses in higher education: (a) lack of the perspectives of faculty and administrators in the research; (b) a lack of a formal definition of collaboration and, along with that, a consideration of the other roles that instructional designers play in higher education; (c) issues regarding the status of faculty and instructional designers in higher education; and (d) copyright ownership issues and their impact on working relationships. The response argues that, until the research explores these issues, the ability of this line of research to effectively advocate for change in the relationships between faculty and instructional designers is limited.","PeriodicalId":43405,"journal":{"name":"New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development","volume":"2010 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to Lubin and Reio, “From the Standpoint of Instructional Designers: Critically Investigating the Coordination of ID Contributions to Collaborative Online Course Development”\",\"authors\":\"Saul Carliner\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19394225231203652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This response provides a response to the Lubin and Reio article, Response to Lubin and Reio, “From the Standpoint of Instructional Designers: Critically Investigating the Coordination of ID Contributions to Collaborative Online Course Development.” Specifically, it explores persistent gaps in the literature on the relationships between faculty and of instructional designers when designing asynchronous online courses in higher education: (a) lack of the perspectives of faculty and administrators in the research; (b) a lack of a formal definition of collaboration and, along with that, a consideration of the other roles that instructional designers play in higher education; (c) issues regarding the status of faculty and instructional designers in higher education; and (d) copyright ownership issues and their impact on working relationships. The response argues that, until the research explores these issues, the ability of this line of research to effectively advocate for change in the relationships between faculty and instructional designers is limited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development\",\"volume\":\"2010 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19394225231203652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19394225231203652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本回应是对Lubin和Reio文章的回应,《对Lubin和Reio的回应:从教学设计师的角度:批判性地调查ID对协作在线课程开发的贡献的协调》。具体来说,它探讨了在设计高等教育异步在线课程时,关于教师和教学设计师之间关系的文献中存在的持续差距:(a)研究中缺乏教师和管理人员的观点;(b)缺乏对协作的正式定义,以及对教学设计师在高等教育中扮演的其他角色的考虑;(c)关于高等教育中教员和教学设计人员地位的问题;(d)版权所有权问题及其对工作关系的影响。回应认为,在研究探索这些问题之前,这条研究路线有效倡导改变教师和教学设计师之间关系的能力是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response to Lubin and Reio, “From the Standpoint of Instructional Designers: Critically Investigating the Coordination of ID Contributions to Collaborative Online Course Development”
This response provides a response to the Lubin and Reio article, Response to Lubin and Reio, “From the Standpoint of Instructional Designers: Critically Investigating the Coordination of ID Contributions to Collaborative Online Course Development.” Specifically, it explores persistent gaps in the literature on the relationships between faculty and of instructional designers when designing asynchronous online courses in higher education: (a) lack of the perspectives of faculty and administrators in the research; (b) a lack of a formal definition of collaboration and, along with that, a consideration of the other roles that instructional designers play in higher education; (c) issues regarding the status of faculty and instructional designers in higher education; and (d) copyright ownership issues and their impact on working relationships. The response argues that, until the research explores these issues, the ability of this line of research to effectively advocate for change in the relationships between faculty and instructional designers is limited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
27.30%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Equity, Empowerment, and Social Justice: Social Entrepreneurship for Formerly Incarcerated Individuals From Tradition to Transformation: The Social Entrepreneurial Journey of Japanese Women A Literature Review of Mad Studies as Critical Pedagogy: What is Mad Studies, and How Does it Implicate the Education of Adults? The Presentation to Publication Pipeline The Death of the Girlboss: Critical Feminist Epistemology and Implications for Human Resource Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1