绘制黑暗空间:电报上非制度化行为者抽样和分类的挑战

Q2 Arts and Humanities Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5771/1615-634x-2023-3-4-212
Pablo Jost, Annett Heft, Kilian Buehling, Maximilian Zehring, Heidi Schulze, Hendrik Bitzmann, Emese Domahidi
{"title":"绘制黑暗空间:电报上非制度化行为者抽样和分类的挑战","authors":"Pablo Jost, Annett Heft, Kilian Buehling, Maximilian Zehring, Heidi Schulze, Hendrik Bitzmann, Emese Domahidi","doi":"10.5771/1615-634x-2023-3-4-212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crafted as an open communication platform characterized by high anonymity and minimal moderation, Telegram has garnered increasing popularity among activists operating within repressive political contexts, as well as among political extremists and conspiracy theorists. While Telegram offers valuable data access to research non-institutionalized activism, scholars studying the latter on Telegram face unique theoretical and methodological challenges in systematically defining, selecting, sampling, and classifying relevant actors and content. This literature review addresses these issues by considering a wide range of recent research. In particular, it discusses the methodological challenges of sampling and classifying heterogeneous groups of (often non-institutionalized) actors. Drawing on social movement research, we first identify challenges specific to the characteristics of non-institutionalized actors and how they become interlaced with Telegram’s platform infrastructure and requirements. We then discuss strategies from previous Telegram research for the identification and sampling of a study population through multistage sampling procedures and the classification of actors. Finally, we derive challenges and potential strategies for future research and discuss ethical challenges.","PeriodicalId":36375,"journal":{"name":"Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping a Dark Space: Challenges in Sampling and Classifying Non- Institutionalized Actors on Telegram\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Jost, Annett Heft, Kilian Buehling, Maximilian Zehring, Heidi Schulze, Hendrik Bitzmann, Emese Domahidi\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/1615-634x-2023-3-4-212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Crafted as an open communication platform characterized by high anonymity and minimal moderation, Telegram has garnered increasing popularity among activists operating within repressive political contexts, as well as among political extremists and conspiracy theorists. While Telegram offers valuable data access to research non-institutionalized activism, scholars studying the latter on Telegram face unique theoretical and methodological challenges in systematically defining, selecting, sampling, and classifying relevant actors and content. This literature review addresses these issues by considering a wide range of recent research. In particular, it discusses the methodological challenges of sampling and classifying heterogeneous groups of (often non-institutionalized) actors. Drawing on social movement research, we first identify challenges specific to the characteristics of non-institutionalized actors and how they become interlaced with Telegram’s platform infrastructure and requirements. We then discuss strategies from previous Telegram research for the identification and sampling of a study population through multistage sampling procedures and the classification of actors. Finally, we derive challenges and potential strategies for future research and discuss ethical challenges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2023-3-4-212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2023-3-4-212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为一个以高度匿名和最低限度节制为特征的开放交流平台,Telegram在高压政治环境下的活动人士、政治极端分子和阴谋论者中越来越受欢迎。虽然Telegram为研究非制度化的行动主义提供了宝贵的数据,但在Telegram上研究后者的学者在系统地定义、选择、抽样和分类相关行为者和内容方面面临着独特的理论和方法挑战。本文献综述通过考虑广泛的近期研究来解决这些问题。特别地,它讨论了抽样和分类异质群体(通常是非制度化的)行为者的方法挑战。根据社会运动研究,我们首先确定了非制度化参与者的特征所特有的挑战,以及他们如何与Telegram的平台基础设施和需求交织在一起。然后,我们讨论了以前电报研究的策略,通过多阶段抽样程序和演员分类来识别和抽样研究人群。最后,我们得出了未来研究的挑战和潜在策略,并讨论了伦理挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mapping a Dark Space: Challenges in Sampling and Classifying Non- Institutionalized Actors on Telegram
Crafted as an open communication platform characterized by high anonymity and minimal moderation, Telegram has garnered increasing popularity among activists operating within repressive political contexts, as well as among political extremists and conspiracy theorists. While Telegram offers valuable data access to research non-institutionalized activism, scholars studying the latter on Telegram face unique theoretical and methodological challenges in systematically defining, selecting, sampling, and classifying relevant actors and content. This literature review addresses these issues by considering a wide range of recent research. In particular, it discusses the methodological challenges of sampling and classifying heterogeneous groups of (often non-institutionalized) actors. Drawing on social movement research, we first identify challenges specific to the characteristics of non-institutionalized actors and how they become interlaced with Telegram’s platform infrastructure and requirements. We then discuss strategies from previous Telegram research for the identification and sampling of a study population through multistage sampling procedures and the classification of actors. Finally, we derive challenges and potential strategies for future research and discuss ethical challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft
Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Integrating Data Donations in Online Surveys Die Berichterstattung über Suizidalität in Deutschland Wandel der Musikprogrammierung im Radio? Stand und Stellenwert der musikbezogenen Marktforschung bei deutschen Radiosendern 2021 Vielfalt in den Nachrichten. Ein Vergleich digitaler und analoger Angebote von öffentlich-rechtlichen Medien und Tageszeitungen in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz Parasoziale Meinungsführer? Eine qualitative Untersuchung zur Rolle von Social Media Influencer*innen im Informationsverhalten und in Meinungsbildungsprozessen junger Menschen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1