比较运动再现和时间线估计方法对儿童间隔时间的准确性

IF 1.4 Timing & Time Perception Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1163/22134468-bja10094

Quentin Hallez

{"title":"比较运动再现和时间线估计方法对儿童间隔时间的准确性","authors":"Quentin Hallez","doi":"10.1163/22134468-bja10094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This brief report aims to compare the performance of motor reproduction and timeline estimation tasks in two groups of children aged 5–6 and 7–8 years old. The study included 80 children and used a computer-based experiment with two sessions for each method. The findings suggest that motor reproduction and timeline estimation tasks differ in accuracy and variability, with timeline estimation yielding more accurate and less variable estimates. These differences between the two tasks are even more pronounced in younger children. The discussion highlights the importance of using the timeline estimation task for future research on children’s time perception.","PeriodicalId":29927,"journal":{"name":"Timing & Time Perception","volume":"210 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Accuracy of Motor Reproduction and Timeline Estimation Methods for Interval Timing in Children\",\"authors\":\"Quentin Hallez\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22134468-bja10094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This brief report aims to compare the performance of motor reproduction and timeline estimation tasks in two groups of children aged 5–6 and 7–8 years old. The study included 80 children and used a computer-based experiment with two sessions for each method. The findings suggest that motor reproduction and timeline estimation tasks differ in accuracy and variability, with timeline estimation yielding more accurate and less variable estimates. These differences between the two tasks are even more pronounced in younger children. The discussion highlights the importance of using the timeline estimation task for future research on children’s time perception.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Timing & Time Perception\",\"volume\":\"210 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Timing & Time Perception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134468-bja10094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Timing & Time Perception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134468-bja10094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在比较5-6岁和7-8岁两组儿童运动再现和时间线估计任务的表现。该研究包括80名儿童，并采用基于计算机的实验，每种方法分为两个阶段。研究结果表明，运动再现和时间线估计任务在准确性和可变性方面存在差异，时间线估计产生的估计更准确，变量更少。这两项任务之间的差异在年幼的孩子身上表现得更为明显。讨论强调了使用时间估计任务对未来儿童时间感知研究的重要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Comparing the Accuracy of Motor Reproduction and Timeline Estimation Methods for Interval Timing in Children

Abstract This brief report aims to compare the performance of motor reproduction and timeline estimation tasks in two groups of children aged 5–6 and 7–8 years old. The study included 80 children and used a computer-based experiment with two sessions for each method. The findings suggest that motor reproduction and timeline estimation tasks differ in accuracy and variability, with timeline estimation yielding more accurate and less variable estimates. These differences between the two tasks are even more pronounced in younger children. The discussion highlights the importance of using the timeline estimation task for future research on children’s time perception.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Timing & Time Perception Multiple-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Timing & Time Perception aims to be the forum for all psychophysical, neuroimaging, pharmacological, computational, and theoretical advances on the topic of timing and time perception in humans and other animals. We envision a multidisciplinary approach to the topics covered, including the synergy of: Neuroscience and Philosophy for understanding the concept of time, Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence for adapting basic research to artificial agents, Psychiatry, Neurology, Behavioral and Computational Sciences for neuro-rehabilitation and modeling of the disordered brain, to name just a few. Given the ubiquity of interval timing, this journal will host all basic studies, including interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary works on timing and time perception and serve as a forum for discussion and extension of current knowledge on the topic.

期刊最新文献

Causation Bridges the Two Times Consciousness Is Quantum State Reduction Which Creates the Flow of Time Comparing the Accuracy of Motor Reproduction and Timeline Estimation Methods for Interval Timing in Children Doing and Knowing “Physical Time within Human Time” and “Bridging the Neuroscience and Physics of Time”