毛前期“科学”环境修正主义的形成:50年代橡胶树冷害的农业气象解决方案

Jiho Moon
{"title":"毛前期“科学”环境修正主义的形成:50年代橡胶树冷害的农业气象解决方案","authors":"Jiho Moon","doi":"10.38080/crh.2023.08.144.174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are conicting assessments of the large scale rubber tree plantation project that began in the 1950s under the Mao Zedong(毛澤東, 1893~1976) regime. In the environmental history of China, on the one hand, the ‘northward movement(北移)’ of rubber trees is usually criticised as an “unscientic” “political movement” in the Mao’s era, only resulting in the devastating environmental and social disasters in China. On the other hand, the ocial history of Chinese government has often praised the same ‘northward movement’ as the China’s supreme scientic achievement in successfully planting rubber trees at the world’s highest altitude. This study aims to reexamine such conflicting historical assessments, and to shed a new light on the relationship between science and politics in the early phase of the Mao’s regime, first, by showing both international politico-economic and environmental contexts in which such a decision was made to move rubber trees northward; second, by analyzing the experimental research on “protective forests” by a newly emerging group of agricultural meteorologists, who played a crucial role in the plantation project, and how they supported the decision. Rather than focusing on the totalitarian characteristics of the socialist state behind the rubber tree plantation, this research recovers the agency of a group of scientists experimentally supporting the plantation and their careful considerations of the relationship between strategically urgent needs of the state and natural and environmental constraints. is perspective oers a valuable chance to reect on modern China’s endeavors to harness techno-scientic expertise to control environmental disasters.","PeriodicalId":494976,"journal":{"name":"Yeogsa bi'pyeong (Print)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Formation of ‘Scientific’ Environmental Correctionism in the Early Mao Era: The Agricultural Meteorological Solution to the Cold-Weather Damage to Rubber Trees in the 1950s\",\"authors\":\"Jiho Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.38080/crh.2023.08.144.174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are conicting assessments of the large scale rubber tree plantation project that began in the 1950s under the Mao Zedong(毛澤東, 1893~1976) regime. In the environmental history of China, on the one hand, the ‘northward movement(北移)’ of rubber trees is usually criticised as an “unscientic” “political movement” in the Mao’s era, only resulting in the devastating environmental and social disasters in China. On the other hand, the ocial history of Chinese government has often praised the same ‘northward movement’ as the China’s supreme scientic achievement in successfully planting rubber trees at the world’s highest altitude. This study aims to reexamine such conflicting historical assessments, and to shed a new light on the relationship between science and politics in the early phase of the Mao’s regime, first, by showing both international politico-economic and environmental contexts in which such a decision was made to move rubber trees northward; second, by analyzing the experimental research on “protective forests” by a newly emerging group of agricultural meteorologists, who played a crucial role in the plantation project, and how they supported the decision. Rather than focusing on the totalitarian characteristics of the socialist state behind the rubber tree plantation, this research recovers the agency of a group of scientists experimentally supporting the plantation and their careful considerations of the relationship between strategically urgent needs of the state and natural and environmental constraints. is perspective oers a valuable chance to reect on modern China’s endeavors to harness techno-scientic expertise to control environmental disasters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":494976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yeogsa bi'pyeong (Print)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yeogsa bi'pyeong (Print)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38080/crh.2023.08.144.174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeogsa bi'pyeong (Print)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38080/crh.2023.08.144.174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中国环境史上,一方面,橡胶树的“北上运动”通常被批评为毛时代的“不科学”的“政治运动”,只导致了中国毁灭性的环境和社会灾难。另一方面,中国政府的社会史也经常把“北上运动”作为中国在世界上海拔最高的地方成功种植橡胶树的最高科学成就来称赞。本研究旨在重新审视这些相互矛盾的历史评估,并对毛政权早期科学与政治之间的关系有一个新的认识,首先,通过展示国际政治、经济和环境背景,做出了将橡胶树向北移动的决定;第二,分析在人工林项目中发挥关键作用的新兴农业气象学家群体对“防护林”的实验研究,以及他们如何支持这一决定。本研究没有聚焦于橡胶树种植园背后的社会主义国家的极权主义特征,而是恢复了一群实验支持种植园的科学家的机构,以及他们对国家战略迫切需求与自然和环境约束之间关系的仔细考虑。他的观点为我们提供了一个宝贵的机会,让我们反思现代中国利用科技专长来控制环境灾害的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Formation of ‘Scientific’ Environmental Correctionism in the Early Mao Era: The Agricultural Meteorological Solution to the Cold-Weather Damage to Rubber Trees in the 1950s
There are conicting assessments of the large scale rubber tree plantation project that began in the 1950s under the Mao Zedong(毛澤東, 1893~1976) regime. In the environmental history of China, on the one hand, the ‘northward movement(北移)’ of rubber trees is usually criticised as an “unscientic” “political movement” in the Mao’s era, only resulting in the devastating environmental and social disasters in China. On the other hand, the ocial history of Chinese government has often praised the same ‘northward movement’ as the China’s supreme scientic achievement in successfully planting rubber trees at the world’s highest altitude. This study aims to reexamine such conflicting historical assessments, and to shed a new light on the relationship between science and politics in the early phase of the Mao’s regime, first, by showing both international politico-economic and environmental contexts in which such a decision was made to move rubber trees northward; second, by analyzing the experimental research on “protective forests” by a newly emerging group of agricultural meteorologists, who played a crucial role in the plantation project, and how they supported the decision. Rather than focusing on the totalitarian characteristics of the socialist state behind the rubber tree plantation, this research recovers the agency of a group of scientists experimentally supporting the plantation and their careful considerations of the relationship between strategically urgent needs of the state and natural and environmental constraints. is perspective oers a valuable chance to reect on modern China’s endeavors to harness techno-scientic expertise to control environmental disasters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cultural Exchange and World Literature Network of North Korea and Eastern Europe since Post-war Era : Focusing on Poland, Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, Rumania Travelouge and Translation Literature 군사화학공장에서 고급 리조트로 ―‘809공장’의 모빌리티와 공간 Mass Parathion Poisoning and Establishment of Pesticide Control Act in Korea Daily Life in North Korean Society After the Armistice Regime: The Reality of ‘Postwar Recovery’ and the People in North Korea’s ‘Literature and Arts’ Narratives of Separated Korean Families Overseas in South America: Reconfiguring space-time and meaning as possibilities for existence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1