按摩对分娩满意度的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 1.7 Q2 Medicine Advances in integrative medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aimed.2022.05.002
Mahsa Maghalian , Mahin Kamalifard , Robab Hassanzadeh , Mojgan Mirghafourvand
{"title":"按摩对分娩满意度的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Mahsa Maghalian ,&nbsp;Mahin Kamalifard ,&nbsp;Robab Hassanzadeh ,&nbsp;Mojgan Mirghafourvand","doi":"10.1016/j.aimed.2022.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the effects of massage on childbirth satisfaction in women with a healthy single fetus.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, databases in English and Persian (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of science, SID, Magiran) were systematically searched until April 28, 2022. The risk of bias for each study was assessed using Cochran's handbook and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software and the quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 2286 articles were found after searching the relevant databases; among them 1319, 931, and 36 articles were screened by reviewing their titles, abstracts, and full texts, respectively. Finally, 6 articles with a sample size of 615 participants were included in this systematic review. The results of a meta-analysis on dichotomous data (OR: 4.95, 95% CI: 1.86–13.17, two trials, 110 women) and another meta-analysis on continuous data (SMD: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.20–1.65, three trials, 260 women) showed that massage had a statistically significant effect on improving childbirth satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results of this meta-analysis indicated that massage significantly improved labor satisfaction in the intervention group compared to the control group. Researchers are suggested to carry out well-designed clinical trials, use reliable tools such as the Labor Agentry Scale and Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale (MCSRS) to assess the effect of massage on childbirth satisfaction, and report side effects of massage in the participants as a separate outcome in future studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7343,"journal":{"name":"Advances in integrative medicine","volume":"9 3","pages":"Pages 151-158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of massage on childbirth satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mahsa Maghalian ,&nbsp;Mahin Kamalifard ,&nbsp;Robab Hassanzadeh ,&nbsp;Mojgan Mirghafourvand\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aimed.2022.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the effects of massage on childbirth satisfaction in women with a healthy single fetus.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, databases in English and Persian (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of science, SID, Magiran) were systematically searched until April 28, 2022. The risk of bias for each study was assessed using Cochran's handbook and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software and the quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 2286 articles were found after searching the relevant databases; among them 1319, 931, and 36 articles were screened by reviewing their titles, abstracts, and full texts, respectively. Finally, 6 articles with a sample size of 615 participants were included in this systematic review. The results of a meta-analysis on dichotomous data (OR: 4.95, 95% CI: 1.86–13.17, two trials, 110 women) and another meta-analysis on continuous data (SMD: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.20–1.65, three trials, 260 women) showed that massage had a statistically significant effect on improving childbirth satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results of this meta-analysis indicated that massage significantly improved labor satisfaction in the intervention group compared to the control group. Researchers are suggested to carry out well-designed clinical trials, use reliable tools such as the Labor Agentry Scale and Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale (MCSRS) to assess the effect of massage on childbirth satisfaction, and report side effects of massage in the participants as a separate outcome in future studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in integrative medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 151-158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in integrative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958822000581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in integrative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958822000581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的探讨按摩对健康单胎产妇分娩满意度的影响。方法在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,系统检索了截至2022年4月28日的英文和波斯语数据库(PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Google Scholar、Scopus、Web of science、SID、Magiran)。每项研究的偏倚风险采用Cochran’s handbook进行评估,meta分析采用RevMan 5.3软件进行,证据质量采用GRADE方法进行评估。结果检索相关数据库,共检索到2286篇文献;对其中1319篇、931篇、36篇论文分别通过题目、摘要、全文进行筛选。最后,本系统综述纳入6篇文章,样本量为615名参与者。二分类数据的荟萃分析结果(OR: 4.95, 95% CI: 1.86-13.17,两项试验,110名女性)和连续数据的荟萃分析结果(SMD: 0.92;95% CI: 0.20-1.65(3项试验,260名妇女)表明,按摩对提高分娩满意度有统计学意义。结论本荟萃分析结果显示,干预组与对照组相比,按摩显著提高了分娩满意度。建议研究者进行精心设计的临床试验,使用可靠的工具,如劳动中介量表和麦基分娩满意度评定量表(MCSRS)来评估按摩对分娩满意度的影响,并在未来的研究中将按摩对参与者的副作用作为单独的结果报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of massage on childbirth satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To examine the effects of massage on childbirth satisfaction in women with a healthy single fetus.

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, databases in English and Persian (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of science, SID, Magiran) were systematically searched until April 28, 2022. The risk of bias for each study was assessed using Cochran's handbook and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software and the quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

Results

A total of 2286 articles were found after searching the relevant databases; among them 1319, 931, and 36 articles were screened by reviewing their titles, abstracts, and full texts, respectively. Finally, 6 articles with a sample size of 615 participants were included in this systematic review. The results of a meta-analysis on dichotomous data (OR: 4.95, 95% CI: 1.86–13.17, two trials, 110 women) and another meta-analysis on continuous data (SMD: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.20–1.65, three trials, 260 women) showed that massage had a statistically significant effect on improving childbirth satisfaction.

Conclusion

The results of this meta-analysis indicated that massage significantly improved labor satisfaction in the intervention group compared to the control group. Researchers are suggested to carry out well-designed clinical trials, use reliable tools such as the Labor Agentry Scale and Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale (MCSRS) to assess the effect of massage on childbirth satisfaction, and report side effects of massage in the participants as a separate outcome in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in integrative medicine
Advances in integrative medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Integrative Medicine (AIMED) is an international peer-reviewed, evidence-based research and review journal that is multi-disciplinary within the fields of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. The journal focuses on rigorous quantitative and qualitative research including systematic reviews, clinical trials and surveys, whilst also welcoming medical hypotheses and clinically-relevant articles and case studies disclosing practical learning tools for the consulting practitioner. By promoting research and practice excellence in the field, and cross collaboration between relevant practitioner groups and associations, the journal aims to advance the practice of IM, identify areas for future research, and improve patient health outcomes. International networking is encouraged through clinical innovation, the establishment of best practice and by providing opportunities for cooperation between organisations and communities.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The reasons for the use of traditional and complementary medicine by cancer patients in Morocco A hot-water extract of Sargassum hemiphyllum as the sole treatment for allergic contact dermatitis – A case report The safety and tolerability of Annona muricata leaf product in people living with cancer: Study protocol Effect of DU meridian long snake moxibustion on intestinal flora of people with yang deficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1