了解利比里亚妇女接受艾滋病毒检测的情况:切割女性生殖器官的作用。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Ajar-African Journal of Aids Research Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-28 DOI:10.2989/16085906.2023.2275695
Daniel Amoak, Nancy Osei-Kye, Florence W Anfaara, Yujiro Sano, Roger Antabe, Isaac Luginaah
{"title":"了解利比里亚妇女接受艾滋病毒检测的情况:切割女性生殖器官的作用。","authors":"Daniel Amoak, Nancy Osei-Kye, Florence W Anfaara, Yujiro Sano, Roger Antabe, Isaac Luginaah","doi":"10.2989/16085906.2023.2275695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Past studies show that the processes of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) on women can increase their susceptibility to HIV infection. This is because genital tears or ruptures, scars and wounds from FGM/C may expose survivors to heightened risks of contracting sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, if they engage in unsafe sexual practices. Hence, there is the need to promote HIV screening and testing among this population. Yet, in Liberia, there is a dearth of studies exploring the uptake of HIV testing among women who have experienced FGM/C. To understand this relationship, we used the 2019-2020 Liberia Demographic and Health Survey (LDHS) and employed logistic regression analysis to answer the following questions: (1) Are FGM/C survivors less likely to have been tested for HIV compared to non-FGM/C women; and (2) How does this disparity in the uptake of HIV testing differ by women's marital status? We found that survivors of FGM/C were less likely to have been tested for HIV than non-FGM/C women, even after accounting for theoretically relevant variables (OR = 0.83, <i>p</i> < 0.01). In response to our second question, we found that survivors of FGM/C who were formerly married were less likely to have been tested for HIV compared to their non-FGM/C counterparts (OR = 0.48, <i>p</i> < 0.01). These findings highlight the importance of trauma-informed HIV prevention strategies in Liberia, and the need for policymakers to take a holistic approach to addressing the challenges that FGM/C survivors, especially formerly married women, may face in accessing HIV prevention and testing services, and to work towards creating a more inclusive and supportive environment for all at-risk groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":50833,"journal":{"name":"Ajar-African Journal of Aids Research","volume":"22 3","pages":"226-236"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the uptake of HIV testing among women in Liberia: the role of female genital mutilation/cutting.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Amoak, Nancy Osei-Kye, Florence W Anfaara, Yujiro Sano, Roger Antabe, Isaac Luginaah\",\"doi\":\"10.2989/16085906.2023.2275695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Past studies show that the processes of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) on women can increase their susceptibility to HIV infection. This is because genital tears or ruptures, scars and wounds from FGM/C may expose survivors to heightened risks of contracting sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, if they engage in unsafe sexual practices. Hence, there is the need to promote HIV screening and testing among this population. Yet, in Liberia, there is a dearth of studies exploring the uptake of HIV testing among women who have experienced FGM/C. To understand this relationship, we used the 2019-2020 Liberia Demographic and Health Survey (LDHS) and employed logistic regression analysis to answer the following questions: (1) Are FGM/C survivors less likely to have been tested for HIV compared to non-FGM/C women; and (2) How does this disparity in the uptake of HIV testing differ by women's marital status? We found that survivors of FGM/C were less likely to have been tested for HIV than non-FGM/C women, even after accounting for theoretically relevant variables (OR = 0.83, <i>p</i> < 0.01). In response to our second question, we found that survivors of FGM/C who were formerly married were less likely to have been tested for HIV compared to their non-FGM/C counterparts (OR = 0.48, <i>p</i> < 0.01). These findings highlight the importance of trauma-informed HIV prevention strategies in Liberia, and the need for policymakers to take a holistic approach to addressing the challenges that FGM/C survivors, especially formerly married women, may face in accessing HIV prevention and testing services, and to work towards creating a more inclusive and supportive environment for all at-risk groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ajar-African Journal of Aids Research\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"226-236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ajar-African Journal of Aids Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2989/16085906.2023.2275695\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ajar-African Journal of Aids Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/16085906.2023.2275695","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去的研究表明,切割女性生殖器官的过程会增加她们对艾滋病毒感染的易感性。这是因为,如果幸存者从事不安全的性行为,生殖器撕裂或破裂、疤痕和伤口可能使他们面临感染包括艾滋病毒在内的性传播感染的更高风险。因此,有必要在这一人群中促进艾滋病毒筛查和检测。然而,在利比里亚,缺乏对经历过女性生殖器切割/切割的妇女接受艾滋病毒检测的研究。为了理解这种关系,我们使用了2019-2020年利比里亚人口与健康调查(LDHS),并采用logistic回归分析来回答以下问题:(1)与未切割女性生殖器官的妇女相比,切割女性生殖器官的幸存者接受艾滋病毒检测的可能性是否更低;(2)这种接受艾滋病毒检测的差异如何因妇女的婚姻状况而异?我们发现,即使在考虑了理论相关变量(OR = 0.83, p < 0.01)之后,女性生殖器切割/切割幸存者接受艾滋病毒检测的可能性也低于未接受过女性生殖器切割/切割的女性。在回答我们的第二个问题时,我们发现,曾经结过婚的女性生殖器切割幸存者接受艾滋病毒检测的可能性低于未接受过女性生殖器切割的幸存者(OR = 0.48, p < 0.01)。这些发现强调了利比里亚创伤性艾滋病毒预防战略的重要性,以及决策者需要采取整体方法来解决切割女性生殖器官/残割幸存者,特别是已婚妇女在获得艾滋病毒预防和检测服务方面可能面临的挑战,并努力为所有风险群体创造一个更具包容性和支持性的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the uptake of HIV testing among women in Liberia: the role of female genital mutilation/cutting.

Past studies show that the processes of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) on women can increase their susceptibility to HIV infection. This is because genital tears or ruptures, scars and wounds from FGM/C may expose survivors to heightened risks of contracting sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, if they engage in unsafe sexual practices. Hence, there is the need to promote HIV screening and testing among this population. Yet, in Liberia, there is a dearth of studies exploring the uptake of HIV testing among women who have experienced FGM/C. To understand this relationship, we used the 2019-2020 Liberia Demographic and Health Survey (LDHS) and employed logistic regression analysis to answer the following questions: (1) Are FGM/C survivors less likely to have been tested for HIV compared to non-FGM/C women; and (2) How does this disparity in the uptake of HIV testing differ by women's marital status? We found that survivors of FGM/C were less likely to have been tested for HIV than non-FGM/C women, even after accounting for theoretically relevant variables (OR = 0.83, p < 0.01). In response to our second question, we found that survivors of FGM/C who were formerly married were less likely to have been tested for HIV compared to their non-FGM/C counterparts (OR = 0.48, p < 0.01). These findings highlight the importance of trauma-informed HIV prevention strategies in Liberia, and the need for policymakers to take a holistic approach to addressing the challenges that FGM/C survivors, especially formerly married women, may face in accessing HIV prevention and testing services, and to work towards creating a more inclusive and supportive environment for all at-risk groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ajar-African Journal of Aids Research
Ajar-African Journal of Aids Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: African Journal of AIDS Research (AJAR) is a peer-reviewed research journal publishing papers that make an original contribution to the understanding of social dimensions of HIV/AIDS in African contexts. AJAR includes articles from, amongst others, the disciplines of sociology, demography, epidemiology, social geography, economics, psychology, anthropology, philosophy, health communication, media, cultural studies, public health, education, nursing science and social work. Papers relating to impact, care, prevention and social planning, as well as articles covering social theory and the history and politics of HIV/AIDS, will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Framing HIV and AIDS in competitive authoritarian democracies. Case study of the print press in Mozambique, 1986-2020. The factor structure of the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD-R-20) among South African antiretroviral therapy users. Understanding depression, anxiety and stress in young people living with HIV in Ghana. "We mostly focus on preventing pregnancy, we don't really focus on preventing HIV … ": Young people's perceptions and priorities when preventing unplanned pregnancy and HIV. Assessing the pertinence and usefulness of HIV and AIDS indicators for evaluating clinical care quality: Perspectives of health care professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1