使用经济操纵影响自闭症谱系障碍青少年和成人的选择

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Behavioral Education Pub Date : 2023-11-15 DOI:10.1007/s10864-023-09534-4
Robert H. LaRue, Christopher J. Manente, Lauren Pepa, Erica Dashow, James C. Maraventano, Kimberly N. Sloman, Kate E. Fiske, Lara Delmolino, Jenna Budge
{"title":"使用经济操纵影响自闭症谱系障碍青少年和成人的选择","authors":"Robert H. LaRue, Christopher J. Manente, Lauren Pepa, Erica Dashow, James C. Maraventano, Kimberly N. Sloman, Kate E. Fiske, Lara Delmolino, Jenna Budge","doi":"10.1007/s10864-023-09534-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As educators who provide support to individuals with ASD, our primary goal should be to teach the skills necessary to live as independently as possible. As critically important as these skills are, teaching independent living skills can sometimes be challenging when motivation is low. These issues become even more complicated as individuals get older, and practical and ethical issues may preclude the use of physical prompting. The purpose of the current investigation was to use economic manipulations to encourage three adolescents and adults with ASD and intellectual disabilities to complete nonpreferred activities without using physical prompting and/or escape extinction. Specifically, we adapted the basic concepts of behavioral economics (altering the “pay rate” for certain tasks and the “cost” of certain reinforcers) to influence choices made when offered several work tasks and rewards. With the implementation of economic manipulations, the three participants started to voluntarily complete nonpreferred tasks in the absence of staff prompting. In addition, one of the participants selected alternative rewards following the manipulations. The results are important as they represent a way to incorporate choice into programming while limiting the need for intrusive prompting.</p>","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Economic Manipulations to Influence Choice in Adolescents and Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders\",\"authors\":\"Robert H. LaRue, Christopher J. Manente, Lauren Pepa, Erica Dashow, James C. Maraventano, Kimberly N. Sloman, Kate E. Fiske, Lara Delmolino, Jenna Budge\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10864-023-09534-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As educators who provide support to individuals with ASD, our primary goal should be to teach the skills necessary to live as independently as possible. As critically important as these skills are, teaching independent living skills can sometimes be challenging when motivation is low. These issues become even more complicated as individuals get older, and practical and ethical issues may preclude the use of physical prompting. The purpose of the current investigation was to use economic manipulations to encourage three adolescents and adults with ASD and intellectual disabilities to complete nonpreferred activities without using physical prompting and/or escape extinction. Specifically, we adapted the basic concepts of behavioral economics (altering the “pay rate” for certain tasks and the “cost” of certain reinforcers) to influence choices made when offered several work tasks and rewards. With the implementation of economic manipulations, the three participants started to voluntarily complete nonpreferred tasks in the absence of staff prompting. In addition, one of the participants selected alternative rewards following the manipulations. The results are important as they represent a way to incorporate choice into programming while limiting the need for intrusive prompting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Education\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09534-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09534-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为为自闭症患者提供支持的教育工作者,我们的首要目标应该是教授他们尽可能独立生活的必要技能。尽管这些技能至关重要,但当动机不高时,教授独立生活技能有时会很有挑战性。随着个人年龄的增长,这些问题变得更加复杂,现实和道德问题可能会阻碍身体刺激的使用。本研究的目的是利用经济手段来鼓励3名患有自闭症和智力障碍的青少年和成年人在不使用身体提示和/或逃避灭绝的情况下完成非首选活动。具体来说,我们调整了行为经济学的基本概念(改变某些任务的“报酬率”和某些强化物的“成本”),以影响在提供几个工作任务和奖励时做出的选择。随着经济操纵的实施,三名参与者开始在没有工作人员提示的情况下自愿完成非首选任务。此外,其中一名参与者在操作后选择了其他奖励。这些结果很重要,因为它们代表了一种将选择纳入编程的方法,同时限制了对侵入性提示的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Use of Economic Manipulations to Influence Choice in Adolescents and Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders

As educators who provide support to individuals with ASD, our primary goal should be to teach the skills necessary to live as independently as possible. As critically important as these skills are, teaching independent living skills can sometimes be challenging when motivation is low. These issues become even more complicated as individuals get older, and practical and ethical issues may preclude the use of physical prompting. The purpose of the current investigation was to use economic manipulations to encourage three adolescents and adults with ASD and intellectual disabilities to complete nonpreferred activities without using physical prompting and/or escape extinction. Specifically, we adapted the basic concepts of behavioral economics (altering the “pay rate” for certain tasks and the “cost” of certain reinforcers) to influence choices made when offered several work tasks and rewards. With the implementation of economic manipulations, the three participants started to voluntarily complete nonpreferred tasks in the absence of staff prompting. In addition, one of the participants selected alternative rewards following the manipulations. The results are important as they represent a way to incorporate choice into programming while limiting the need for intrusive prompting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Education
Journal of Behavioral Education EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Education is an international forum dedicated to publishing original research papers on the application of behavioral principles and technology to education. Education is defined broadly and the journal places no restriction on the types of participants involved in the reported studies--including by age, ability, or setting. Each quarterly issue presents empirical research investigating best-practices and innovative methods to address a wide range of educational targets and issues pertaining to the needs of diverse learners and to implementation. The Journal of Behavioral Education is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal whose target audience is educational researchers and practitioners including general and special education teachers, school psychologists, and other school personnel.  Rigorous experimental designs, including single-subject with replication and group designs are considered for publication. An emphasis is placed on direct observation measures of the primary dependent variable in studies of educational issues, problems, and practices.  Discussion articles and critical reviews also are published.
期刊最新文献
Using Constant Time Delay to Teach Sight Words to Students Identified as Deafblind Applying “Mastery” Criteria to Sets and Individual Operants: A Replication with Preschoolers with Disabilities The Effect of a Tiered Professional Development Framework on Check-In/Check-Out Treatment Fidelity Efficiency and Child Preference for Specific Prompting Procedures Social and Ecological Validity of the Good Behavior Game: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1