透过现代哲学的棱镜看康德的愿景：存在的人的维度问题

Q3 Arts and Humanities Sententiae Pub Date : 2023-12-31 DOI:10.31649/sent13.02.092

Tetjana Meteljova

{"title":"透过现代哲学的棱镜看康德的愿景：存在的人的维度问题","authors":"Tetjana Meteljova","doi":"10.31649/sent13.02.092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The readers of the article can observe the connection between the conceptual theses of modern philosophic schools (i.e. phenomenology, existentialism, structuralism, postmodernist philosophy) and Kant’s researches of the problem of the adequacy of the human being and the world. Stressing Kant’s primogeniture in discovering and researching the opposition between “the world of a human’s acts” and “the world of the nature’s determinations”, the Author comes to the conclusion that the ontological demarcation between the two worlds – the natural world and the world, freely created by a human being – which was grounded by Kant, is now lost by the modern philosophy. According to this modernity it is still a long way to a new stratum of Kant’s achievements, to a new confirmation of the difference and the parity of the two dimensions of the being.","PeriodicalId":37673,"journal":{"name":"Sententiae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kant’s Visions through the Prism of Modern Philosophy: the Problem of the Human Dimension of Being\",\"authors\":\"Tetjana Meteljova\",\"doi\":\"10.31649/sent13.02.092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The readers of the article can observe the connection between the conceptual theses of modern philosophic schools (i.e. phenomenology, existentialism, structuralism, postmodernist philosophy) and Kant’s researches of the problem of the adequacy of the human being and the world. Stressing Kant’s primogeniture in discovering and researching the opposition between “the world of a human’s acts” and “the world of the nature’s determinations”, the Author comes to the conclusion that the ontological demarcation between the two worlds – the natural world and the world, freely created by a human being – which was grounded by Kant, is now lost by the modern philosophy. According to this modernity it is still a long way to a new stratum of Kant’s achievements, to a new confirmation of the difference and the parity of the two dimensions of the being.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sententiae\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sententiae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31649/sent13.02.092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sententiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31649/sent13.02.092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

文章的读者可以看到现代哲学流派（即现象学、存在主义、结构主义、后现代主义哲学）的概念论题与康德对人与世界的适当性问题的研究之间的联系。作者强调了康德在发现和研究 "人类行为的世界 "与 "自然决定的世界 "之间的对立方面的首创性，并得出结论认为，康德所立足的两个世界--自然世界和人类自由创造的世界--之间的本体论划分，如今已被现代哲学所遗失。根据这种现代性，要想在康德的成就基础上再上一层楼，重新确认存在的两个维度之间的差异和对等，还有很长的路要走。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Kant’s Visions through the Prism of Modern Philosophy: the Problem of the Human Dimension of Being

The readers of the article can observe the connection between the conceptual theses of modern philosophic schools (i.e. phenomenology, existentialism, structuralism, postmodernist philosophy) and Kant’s researches of the problem of the adequacy of the human being and the world. Stressing Kant’s primogeniture in discovering and researching the opposition between “the world of a human’s acts” and “the world of the nature’s determinations”, the Author comes to the conclusion that the ontological demarcation between the two worlds – the natural world and the world, freely created by a human being – which was grounded by Kant, is now lost by the modern philosophy. According to this modernity it is still a long way to a new stratum of Kant’s achievements, to a new confirmation of the difference and the parity of the two dimensions of the being.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Sententiae Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Sententiae is historico-philosophical open access journal. Journal created by Modern philosophy''s research group (Pascalian society). Founded in 2000. Published twice a year, in June and December. Our purpose is to foster the development of a wide gamut of contemporary approaches, active implementation of them into research practice, and establishment of high standards of teaching philosophy basing on the achievements of contemporary history of philosophy. Our key priority is to ensure the empirical substantiation of historico-philosophical conceptions, basing on the criteria of literality, exhaustivity, contextuality and taking into account the existing speculative interpretations. Jean-Luc Marion was the first to formulate this set of criteria in 1998 as the main features of contemporary researches of Descartes''s philosophy. We regard these principles as the methodological background of any substantiated research method in the history of philosophy. Publishing materials on all historico-philosophical topics, we pay special attention to researches in terminology, issues of philosophical translation and untranslatability, manuscript researches (including handwritten heritage of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy professors of ХVІІ–ХVІІІ century), and cover the development of large-scale projects in this area. We also publish new bilingual and commented Ukrainian translations of classical foreign philosophical texts. Among our priorities there is also a coverage of the history of philosophical thought in Ukraine and other Eastern European countries and its relations to the wider cultural context (theology, literature, natural sciences, political ideology etc). The content of each issue is distributed according to Genre Sections and Thematic Headings. Currently there are 10 Genre Sections.