战略管理的当前趋势:SWOT和SOAR方法的比较分析

Pongsiri Kamkankaew
{"title":"战略管理的当前趋势:SWOT和SOAR方法的比较分析","authors":"Pongsiri Kamkankaew","doi":"10.60101/gbafr.2023.269044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This review article explores the debate between traditional SWOT analysis and the emerging SOAR framework in strategic management. It aims to understand their comparative effectiveness in the modern complex business environment.Body of knowledge – The results indicate that both SWOT and SOAR frameworks offer complementary strategic management approaches. SWOT is suitable for initial assessments and discussions, while SOAR is more aligned with innovation, collaboration, and positive organizational change.Implications – SWOT and SOAR are strategic frameworks. SWOT evaluates an organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, focusing on realistic assessment. SOAR, for strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and results, emphasizes potential and positivity, suitable for fostering growth in innovative settings.Originality/Value – The originality of this work lies in its comparative analysis of two popular strategic frameworks, providing insights into their applicability and effectiveness in today's dynamic business landscape. The value of this analysis is in guiding organizations to choose the appropriate framework based on their specific strategic needs.","PeriodicalId":509459,"journal":{"name":"RMUTT GLOBAL BUSINESS ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE REVIEW","volume":"57 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CURRENT TRENDS IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SWOT AND SOAR APPROACHES\",\"authors\":\"Pongsiri Kamkankaew\",\"doi\":\"10.60101/gbafr.2023.269044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – This review article explores the debate between traditional SWOT analysis and the emerging SOAR framework in strategic management. It aims to understand their comparative effectiveness in the modern complex business environment.Body of knowledge – The results indicate that both SWOT and SOAR frameworks offer complementary strategic management approaches. SWOT is suitable for initial assessments and discussions, while SOAR is more aligned with innovation, collaboration, and positive organizational change.Implications – SWOT and SOAR are strategic frameworks. SWOT evaluates an organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, focusing on realistic assessment. SOAR, for strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and results, emphasizes potential and positivity, suitable for fostering growth in innovative settings.Originality/Value – The originality of this work lies in its comparative analysis of two popular strategic frameworks, providing insights into their applicability and effectiveness in today's dynamic business landscape. The value of this analysis is in guiding organizations to choose the appropriate framework based on their specific strategic needs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RMUTT GLOBAL BUSINESS ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"57 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RMUTT GLOBAL BUSINESS ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60101/gbafr.2023.269044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMUTT GLOBAL BUSINESS ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60101/gbafr.2023.269044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 - 本评论文章探讨了战略管理中传统的 SWOT 分析与新兴的 SOAR 框架之间的争论。知识体系 - 研究结果表明,SWOT 和 SOAR 框架都提供了互补的战略管理方法。意义--SWOT 和 SOAR 都是战略框架。SWOT 评估组织的优势、劣势、机会和威胁,侧重于现实评估。SOAR,即优势、机会、愿望和结果,强调潜力和积极性,适合在创新环境中促进发展。原创性/价值--本著作的原创性在于对两种流行的战略框架进行了比较分析,深入探讨了它们在当今动态商业环境中的适用性和有效性。这一分析的价值在于指导组织根据其特定的战略需求选择合适的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CURRENT TRENDS IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SWOT AND SOAR APPROACHES
Purpose – This review article explores the debate between traditional SWOT analysis and the emerging SOAR framework in strategic management. It aims to understand their comparative effectiveness in the modern complex business environment.Body of knowledge – The results indicate that both SWOT and SOAR frameworks offer complementary strategic management approaches. SWOT is suitable for initial assessments and discussions, while SOAR is more aligned with innovation, collaboration, and positive organizational change.Implications – SWOT and SOAR are strategic frameworks. SWOT evaluates an organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, focusing on realistic assessment. SOAR, for strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and results, emphasizes potential and positivity, suitable for fostering growth in innovative settings.Originality/Value – The originality of this work lies in its comparative analysis of two popular strategic frameworks, providing insights into their applicability and effectiveness in today's dynamic business landscape. The value of this analysis is in guiding organizations to choose the appropriate framework based on their specific strategic needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FACTORS AFFECTING INTENTION TO USE NATIONAL SINGLE WINDOW (NSW) THROUGH PERCEIVED EASE OF USE AND PERCEIVED USEFULNESS IN IMPORT, EXPORT AND LOGISTICS ENTERPRISES EXPLORING BRAND AWARENESS AND UTILIZATION PATTERNS OF POISON CONTROL CENTER SERVICES IN THAILAND: A COMPARATIVE STUDY AMONG HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF LOCAL KNOWLEDGE ON BRAND EQUITY AND PURCHASE INTENTIONS: A CASE STUDY OF CULTURAL PRODUCTS IN PATHUM THANI CURRENT TRENDS IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SWOT AND SOAR APPROACHES RETURNS TO EDUCATION UNDER THE HUKOU SYSTEM: WHAT IS THE ROLE OF SCHOOL TYPE?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1