脊柱超声与核磁共振成像在儿科脊柱异常诊断中的价值比较

Hamada Khater, Sherif Elrefaey, Gehad Fetouh
{"title":"脊柱超声与核磁共振成像在儿科脊柱异常诊断中的价值比较","authors":"Hamada Khater, Sherif Elrefaey, Gehad Fetouh","doi":"10.21608/bmfj.2023.254247.1977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background: Pediatric spinal anomalies often necessitate accurate and timely diagnosis for effective management. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of spinal ultrasound as initial modality for screening of pediatrics spinal anomalies in comparison to MRI. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on pediatric patients suspected of spinal cord disorders. A detailed clinical examination, spinal ultrasound using high-frequency linear array transducers, and MRI scans were performed on all participants. Results: The 23.44 ± 32.02 days, 93.33% were less than 60 days old. Females comprised 68.9%, males 22.2%, and 8.9% had ambiguous genitalia. Common clinical presentations included back swelling (57.78%), hair tuft (31.11%), and sacral dimple (24.44%). Most anomalies involved the lumbosacral region (80%). Ultrasonography exhibited high diagnostic validity, showing perfect agreement with MRI for myelomeningocele, dorsal dermal sinus, tethered cord, myelocele, disyomatomyelia with segmental spinal dysgenesis, dermal sinus, myelocystocele, and retethering of the cord (Kappa > 0.9). However, for caudal regression syndrome, the Kappa value was 0.656, indicating moderate agreement. The overall diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound compared to MRI was above 95.56% across findings. Conclusion: Spinal ultrasound demonstrates substantial diagnostic accuracy comparable to MRI in identifying pediatric spinal anomalies, particularly for various conditions such as myelomeningocele, dorsal dermal sinus, and tethered cord.","PeriodicalId":503219,"journal":{"name":"Benha Medical Journal","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Value of Spinal Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Spinal Anomalies in Pediatrics in Comparison to MRI\",\"authors\":\"Hamada Khater, Sherif Elrefaey, Gehad Fetouh\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/bmfj.2023.254247.1977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Background: Pediatric spinal anomalies often necessitate accurate and timely diagnosis for effective management. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of spinal ultrasound as initial modality for screening of pediatrics spinal anomalies in comparison to MRI. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on pediatric patients suspected of spinal cord disorders. A detailed clinical examination, spinal ultrasound using high-frequency linear array transducers, and MRI scans were performed on all participants. Results: The 23.44 ± 32.02 days, 93.33% were less than 60 days old. Females comprised 68.9%, males 22.2%, and 8.9% had ambiguous genitalia. Common clinical presentations included back swelling (57.78%), hair tuft (31.11%), and sacral dimple (24.44%). Most anomalies involved the lumbosacral region (80%). Ultrasonography exhibited high diagnostic validity, showing perfect agreement with MRI for myelomeningocele, dorsal dermal sinus, tethered cord, myelocele, disyomatomyelia with segmental spinal dysgenesis, dermal sinus, myelocystocele, and retethering of the cord (Kappa > 0.9). However, for caudal regression syndrome, the Kappa value was 0.656, indicating moderate agreement. The overall diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound compared to MRI was above 95.56% across findings. Conclusion: Spinal ultrasound demonstrates substantial diagnostic accuracy comparable to MRI in identifying pediatric spinal anomalies, particularly for various conditions such as myelomeningocele, dorsal dermal sinus, and tethered cord.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Benha Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Benha Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/bmfj.2023.254247.1977\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benha Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bmfj.2023.254247.1977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:背景:小儿脊柱异常通常需要准确及时的诊断才能得到有效治疗。本研究旨在评估脊柱超声与核磁共振成像相比,作为筛查小儿脊柱异常的初始模式的诊断价值。方法:这项横断面研究的对象是怀疑患有脊髓疾病的儿科患者。所有参与者均接受了详细的临床检查、使用高频线性阵列换能器的脊柱超声检查和核磁共振成像扫描。结果显示23.44 ± 32.02天,93.33%的患者年龄小于60天。女性占 68.9%,男性占 22.2%,8.9%的患者生殖器不明确。常见的临床表现包括背部肿胀(57.78%)、毛丛(31.11%)和骶骨凹陷(24.44%)。大多数异常涉及腰骶部(80%)。超声波检查具有很高的诊断效力,在髓母细胞瘤、真皮背窦、系带、髓鞘、伴节段性脊柱发育不良、真皮窦、髓囊肿和脊髓拴系方面与核磁共振成像完全一致(Kappa > 0.9)。然而,对于尾椎退缩综合征,Kappa 值为 0.656,表明一致性中等。与核磁共振成像相比,超声检查对各种结果的总体诊断准确率高于 95.56%。结论:在识别小儿脊柱异常方面,脊柱超声与核磁共振成像具有相当高的诊断准确性,尤其是在各种情况下,如脊髓脊膜膨出、背真皮窦和脊髓系带等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic Value of Spinal Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Spinal Anomalies in Pediatrics in Comparison to MRI
: Background: Pediatric spinal anomalies often necessitate accurate and timely diagnosis for effective management. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of spinal ultrasound as initial modality for screening of pediatrics spinal anomalies in comparison to MRI. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on pediatric patients suspected of spinal cord disorders. A detailed clinical examination, spinal ultrasound using high-frequency linear array transducers, and MRI scans were performed on all participants. Results: The 23.44 ± 32.02 days, 93.33% were less than 60 days old. Females comprised 68.9%, males 22.2%, and 8.9% had ambiguous genitalia. Common clinical presentations included back swelling (57.78%), hair tuft (31.11%), and sacral dimple (24.44%). Most anomalies involved the lumbosacral region (80%). Ultrasonography exhibited high diagnostic validity, showing perfect agreement with MRI for myelomeningocele, dorsal dermal sinus, tethered cord, myelocele, disyomatomyelia with segmental spinal dysgenesis, dermal sinus, myelocystocele, and retethering of the cord (Kappa > 0.9). However, for caudal regression syndrome, the Kappa value was 0.656, indicating moderate agreement. The overall diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound compared to MRI was above 95.56% across findings. Conclusion: Spinal ultrasound demonstrates substantial diagnostic accuracy comparable to MRI in identifying pediatric spinal anomalies, particularly for various conditions such as myelomeningocele, dorsal dermal sinus, and tethered cord.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease on Health-Related Quality of Life Comparing Fair Control of Hyperglycemia contrary to Intensive Control in Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Procedure Comparison of the Onset Time between 0.25% Bupivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ultrasound‑Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Clinical Trial Intramedullary Nailing Versus Minmally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) in Management of Distal Tibial Fractures Correlation between serum estrogen level and endometrial histology in cases of fibroid uterus in peri-menopausal peroid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1