Takanobu Hoshi, Satoshi Fujii, Kei Watanabe, Yuta Fukumura, Koji Miyazaki, Madoka Takahashi, Sakae Taniguchi, Shingo Kimura, Arisa Saito, Naoki Wada, Masaji Saijo, Kazunori Yamada, Kuninori Iwayama, Marie Itaya, Hideki Sato
{"title":"使用头孢美唑和美罗培南进行抗菌治疗的不同方法对非重症广谱β-乳酰胺酶产气型大肠埃希菌菌血症缓解时间的影响","authors":"Takanobu Hoshi, Satoshi Fujii, Kei Watanabe, Yuta Fukumura, Koji Miyazaki, Madoka Takahashi, Sakae Taniguchi, Shingo Kimura, Arisa Saito, Naoki Wada, Masaji Saijo, Kazunori Yamada, Kuninori Iwayama, Marie Itaya, Hideki Sato","doi":"10.3390/idr16010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carbapenems are antimicrobial agents commonly used to treat extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria. Although cefmetazole (CMZ) is considered effective for ESBL-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (ESBL-EC) bacteremia, previous studies showed its limitations, including the influence of the initial antimicrobial agent. Here, we examined the effects of different approaches to antimicrobial therapy with CMZ and meropenem (MEPM) on the time to defervescence in ESBL-EC bacteremia. Notably, the influence of previous antimicrobial agents was excluded. Inpatients with ESBL-EC detected in blood cultures between April 2018 and March 2023 were included and assigned to CMZ (<i>n</i> = 14), MEPM (<i>n</i> = 8), de-escalation to CMZ (dCMZ; <i>n</i> = 9), or escalation to MEPM (eMEPM; <i>n</i> = 11) groups. The median time to defervescence was 3.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 days in the CMZ, MEPM, dCMZ, and eMEPM groups, respectively, with no significant differences. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed a significant difference in the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.378 (0.145-0.984) for the time to defervescence with CMZ versus MEPM (<i>p</i> = 0.046). The extent of a delayed time to defervescence is greater with early CMZ administration than with MEPM administration in patients with non-severe ESBL-EC bacteremia.</p>","PeriodicalId":13579,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Disease Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10801497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Different Approaches to Antimicrobial Therapy with Cefmetazole and Meropenem on the Time to Defervescence in Non-Severe Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> Bacteremia.\",\"authors\":\"Takanobu Hoshi, Satoshi Fujii, Kei Watanabe, Yuta Fukumura, Koji Miyazaki, Madoka Takahashi, Sakae Taniguchi, Shingo Kimura, Arisa Saito, Naoki Wada, Masaji Saijo, Kazunori Yamada, Kuninori Iwayama, Marie Itaya, Hideki Sato\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/idr16010003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Carbapenems are antimicrobial agents commonly used to treat extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria. Although cefmetazole (CMZ) is considered effective for ESBL-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (ESBL-EC) bacteremia, previous studies showed its limitations, including the influence of the initial antimicrobial agent. Here, we examined the effects of different approaches to antimicrobial therapy with CMZ and meropenem (MEPM) on the time to defervescence in ESBL-EC bacteremia. Notably, the influence of previous antimicrobial agents was excluded. Inpatients with ESBL-EC detected in blood cultures between April 2018 and March 2023 were included and assigned to CMZ (<i>n</i> = 14), MEPM (<i>n</i> = 8), de-escalation to CMZ (dCMZ; <i>n</i> = 9), or escalation to MEPM (eMEPM; <i>n</i> = 11) groups. The median time to defervescence was 3.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 days in the CMZ, MEPM, dCMZ, and eMEPM groups, respectively, with no significant differences. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed a significant difference in the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.378 (0.145-0.984) for the time to defervescence with CMZ versus MEPM (<i>p</i> = 0.046). The extent of a delayed time to defervescence is greater with early CMZ administration than with MEPM administration in patients with non-severe ESBL-EC bacteremia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Disease Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10801497/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Disease Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/idr16010003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Disease Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/idr16010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Different Approaches to Antimicrobial Therapy with Cefmetazole and Meropenem on the Time to Defervescence in Non-Severe Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Bacteremia.
Carbapenems are antimicrobial agents commonly used to treat extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria. Although cefmetazole (CMZ) is considered effective for ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) bacteremia, previous studies showed its limitations, including the influence of the initial antimicrobial agent. Here, we examined the effects of different approaches to antimicrobial therapy with CMZ and meropenem (MEPM) on the time to defervescence in ESBL-EC bacteremia. Notably, the influence of previous antimicrobial agents was excluded. Inpatients with ESBL-EC detected in blood cultures between April 2018 and March 2023 were included and assigned to CMZ (n = 14), MEPM (n = 8), de-escalation to CMZ (dCMZ; n = 9), or escalation to MEPM (eMEPM; n = 11) groups. The median time to defervescence was 3.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 days in the CMZ, MEPM, dCMZ, and eMEPM groups, respectively, with no significant differences. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed a significant difference in the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.378 (0.145-0.984) for the time to defervescence with CMZ versus MEPM (p = 0.046). The extent of a delayed time to defervescence is greater with early CMZ administration than with MEPM administration in patients with non-severe ESBL-EC bacteremia.